Ontology-based geographic data set integration

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1678, Issue , 1999, Pages 60-78

  Uitermark, Harry T ^a   van Oosterom, Peter J M ^a   Mars, Nicolaas J I ^b   Molenaar, Martien ^c  

^a Kadaster (Cadastre and Public Registry Agency)   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; INTEGRATION; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTICS;

DOMAIN ONTOLOGIES; GEOGRAPHIC OBJECTS; OBJECT REPRESENTATIONS; OPERATOR INTERVENTIONS; OVERLAY OPERATIONS; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY; SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS; TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING;

DATA INTEGRATION;

EID: 84957040513     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-48344-6_4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. H. T. Uitermark, “The integration of geographic databases. Realising geodata interoperability through the hypermap metaphor and a mediator architecture”, presented at Second Joint European Conference & Exhibition on Geographical Information (JEC-GI'96), (M. Rumor, R. McMillan, and H. F. L. Ottens, eds.), Vol. I, pp. 92-95, Barcelona, Spain, IOS Press, March 27-29, 1996.
2. F. A. van Wijngaarden, J. D. van Putten, P. J. M. van Oosterom and H. T. Uitermark, “Map Integration. Update propagation in a multi-source environment”, presented at 5th ACM Workshop on Advances in Geographic Information Systems ACM-GIS’97, (R. Laurini, ed.), pp. 71-76, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, ACM, New York, November 13-14, 1997.
3. H. T. Uitermark, P. J. M. van Oosterom, N. J. I. Mars and M. Molenaar, “Propagating updates: finding corresponding objects in a multi-source environment”, presented at 8th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling (SDH98), (T. K. Poiker and N. Chrisman, eds.), pp. 580-591, Vancouver, Canada, International Geographical Union, July 11-15, 1998.
4. A. B. M. Vogels, Propagatie van GBKN-wegenmutaties naar de TOP10vector (in Dutch). Master Thesis, Geodesy Department, Technical University Delft, Delft, The Netherlands, 1999.
5. C.-J. Kim, Implementation of semantic translation for finding the corresponding geometric objects between topographic databases. Master Thesis, International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC), Enschede, The Netherlands, 1999.
6. S. Spaccapietra, C. Parent and Y. Dupont, “Model independent assertions for integration of heterogeneous schemas”, VLDB Journal, Vol. 1, pp. 81-126, 1992.
7. T. Devogele, C. Parent and S. Spaccapietra, “On spatial database integration”, Int. J. Geographical Information Science, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 335-352, 1998.
8. M. Sester, K.-H. Anders and V. Walter, “Linking objects of different spatial data sets by integration and aggregation”, GeoInformatica, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 335-357, 1998.
9. P. E. van der Vet and N. J. I. Mars, “Bottom-up construction of ontologies”, IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 513-526, 1998.
10. J. Malpas, PROLOG: a relational language and its applications. London: Prentice-Hall International, 465 pages, 1987.
11. P. J. M. van Oosterom, “Maintaining consistent topology including historical data in a large spatial database”, presented at Auto-Carto 13, pp. 327-336, Seattle, Washington, USA, 1997.
12. W. Kuhn, Semantics of geographic information, Geoinfo-series, Vol.7. Vienna: Department of Geoinformation, Technical University pages, 1996.
13. F. Hernández Rodríguez, G. Bravo Aranda and A. Martín Navarro, “An ontologybased approach to spatial information modelling”, presented at 7th International symposium on Spatial Data Handling (SDH'96), (M. J. Kraak and M. Molenaar, eds.), Vol. II, pp. 12B.17-12B.29, Delft, The Netherlands, International Geographical Union, August 12-16, 1996.
14. N. J. I. Mars, “What is an ontology?”, in The impact of ontologies on reuse, interoperability, and distributed processing, (A. Goodall, ed.), pp. 9-19, Uxbridge, Middlesex, U.K.: Unicom, 1995.
15. Ravi, “Geo-information terrain model. A Dutch standard for: Terms, definitions and general rules for the classification and coding of objects related to the earth’s surface (NEN3610)”, Ravi Netherlands Council for Geographic Information, Amersfoort, The Netherlands, 1995.
16. Open GIS Consortium Inc., “The OpenGIS Abstract Specification Model”, Open GIS Consortium, Wayland, Massachusetts, USA, 1998.
17. S. Wolfram, Mathematica. A system for doing mathematics by computer, 2nd ed. Reading, Massachusetts, USA: Addison-Wesley, 961 pages, 1991.
18. R. E. Maeder, “Logic Programming I: The interpreter”, The Mathematica Journal, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 53-63, 1994.
19. A. Sheth and V. Kashyap, “So far (schematically) yet so near (semantically)”, presented at IFIP, (D. K. Hsiao, E. J. Neuhold, and R. Sacks-Davis, eds.), pp. 283-312, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland), 1993.
20. M. Molenaar, An introduction to the theory of spatial object modelling for GIS. London: Taylor and Francis, 246 pages, 1998.
21. M. A. Salzmann, “On the modeling of geometric quality for large-scale mapping products”, Surveying and land information systems, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 149-155, 1996.
22. P. C. M. van Asperen, “Digital updates at the Dutch Topographic Service”, presented at XVIII ISPRS-Congress, Vienna, Austria, July 9-19, 1996.
23. H. T. Uitermark, A. B. M. Vogels and P. J. M. van Oosterom, “Semantic and geometric aspects of integrating road networks”, presented at Second International Conference on Interoperating Geographic Information Systems INTEROP'99, (A. Vckovski, K. E. Brassel, and H.-J. Schek, eds.), pp. 177-188, Zürich, Switzerland, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1580, Springer, March 10-12, 1999.