Using FAME assessments to define measurement goals

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2001, Pages 220-232

  Hamann, Dirk ^a   Beitz, Andrew ^a   Müller, Markus ^a   van Solingen, Rini ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER IESE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GOAL-ORIENTED MEASUREMENTS; MEASUREMENT-BASED APPROACH; SHORT TIME FRAMES;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84956990252     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44704-0_18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Basili, V., Caldiera, G.: Improving Software Quality by Reusing Knowledge and Experience. Sloan Management Review (1995)
2. Basili, V.R., Caldiera, C., Rombach, H.D.: Goal Question Metric Paradigm. Encyclopaedia of Software Engineering (Marciniak, J.J., editor), Volume 1, John Wiley & Sons, (1994) 528-532
3. Basili, V.R., Weiss, D.M.: A methodology for collecting valid software engineering data. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 10(1984)6
4. Becker-Kornstaedt, U., Hamann, D., Kempkens, R., Rösch, P., Verlage, M., Webby, R., Zettel, J.: Support for the process engineer: The Spearmint approach to software process definition and process guidance. In: M. Jarke, A. Oberweis (eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, LNCS 1626, Springer (1999) 119-133
5. Beitz, A., El Emam, K., Järvinen, J.: A Business Focus to Assessments. Proceedings of the SPI Conference, Barcelona (1999)
6. nd International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement, Oulu, Finland, June (2000)
7. Bicego, A., Khurana, M., Kuvaja, P.: BOOTSTRAP 3.0 - Software Process Assessment Methodology. Proceedings of the SQM '98 (1998)
8. Birk, A., Hamann, D., Hartkopf, S.: A Framework for the Continuous Monitoring and Evaluation of Improvement Programmes. 2nd International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement, Oulu, Finland, June (2000)
9. Birk, A., Järvinen, J., Komi-Sirviö, S., Oivo, M., Pfahl, D.: PROFES-A Product-driven Process Improvement Methodology. Proceedings of the Fourth European Software Process Improvement Conference (SPI’98), Monte Carlo, Monaco, December (1998)
10. Bøegh, J., Depanfilis, S., Kitchenham, B., Pasquini, A.: A Method for Software Quality Planning, Control, and Evaluation. IEEE Software 16(1999)2, 69-77
11. Briand, L., Basili, L., Hetmanski, C.: Developing Interpretable Models with Optimized Set Reduction for Identifying High-Risk Software Components. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 19(1993)11
12. Briand, L., Differding, C., Rombach, D.: Practical Guidelines for Measurement-based Process Improvement. Software Process-Improvement and Practice, 2(1996)4, 253-280
13. Bröckers, A., Differding, C., Threin, G.: The role of software process modeling in planning industrial measurement programs. In: Proceedings of the Third International Software Metrics Symposium, Berlin, IEEE Computer Society Press, March (1996)
14. El Emam, K., Birk, A.: Validating the ISO/IEC 15504 measures of software development process capability. Journal of Systems and Software (2000) 119-149
15. El Emam, K., Birk, A.: Validating the ISO/IEC 15504 measure of software requirements analysis process capability. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (To appear) (2000)
16. El Emam, K., Drouin, J., Melo, W.: SPICE: The Theory and Practice of Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. IEEE Computer Society (1998)
17. El Emam, K., Goldenson, D.: SPICE: An Empiricist’s Perspective. Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Software Engineering Standards Symposium, August (1995)
18. ESPIRT Project No 23239. PROFES. URL: http://www.profes.org
19. Fenton, N.E., Pfleeger, S.L.: Software Metrics, a rigorous and practical approach. Thomson Computer Press (1996)
20. Hamann, D., Derks, P., Kuvaja, P.: Using ISO 15504 Compliant Assessment Combined with Goal-oriented Measurement for Process Improvement at Dräger Medical Technology. International SPICE Conference. Limerick, Ireland, June (2000)
21. th EUROMIRCO Conference: Workshop on Software Process and Product Improvement. IEEE Computer Society Press, Vasteras, Sweden, August (1998)
22. ISO/IEC. Information technology - Software product evaluation - Quality characteristics and guidelines for their use. ISO/IEC standard 9126. Geneva, Switzerland (1991)
23. ISO/IEC ISO/IEC TR 15504-2: Information Technology - Software Process Assessment - Part 2: A Reference Model for Processes and Process Capability. Technical Report type 2, International Organisation for Standardisation (Ed.), Case Postale 56, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland (1998)
24. nd International SPICE Symposium (1995)
25. Möller, K.H., Paulisch, D.J.: Software Metrics: A practitioner’s guide to improved product development. London, Chapman & Hall (1993)
26. Niessink, F.: Perspectives on improving software maintenance. Siks dissertation series 2000-1, Free University Amsterdam, The Netherlands, March (2000)
27. Software Engineering Institute (SEI). "A" Specification for the CMMI Product Suite. URL: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmm/cmmi/specs/aspec1.4.html#refs
28. van Solingen, R., Berghout, E.: The Goal/Question/Metric Method: a practical guide for quality improvement of software development. Mc Raw-Hill (1999)
29. SPICE Project Trials Team. Phase 2 Trials Interim Report. URL: http://www.iese.fhg.de/SPICE/Trials/p2rp100pub.pdf, June (1998)