Advanced scalarization of array syntax

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1781, Issue , 2000, Pages 219-231

  Roth, Gerald ^a  

^a GONZAGA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROGRAM TRANSLATORS; SYNTACTICS;

ANALYSIS ALGORITHMS; ANALYSIS STRATEGIES; ARRAY SYNTAX; LOOP OPTIMIZATIONS; MULTIPLE PASS; RUN-TIME PERFORMANCE; SCALARIZATION; STANDARD PRACTICES;

PROGRAM COMPILERS;

EID: 84956983833     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-46423-9_15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. J. R. Allen and K. Kennedy. Automatic translation of Fortran programs to vector form. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 9(4):491-542, October 1987.
2. J. R. Allen and K. Kennedy. Vector register allocation. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 41(10):1290-1317, October 1992.
3. D. F. Bacon, S. L. Graham, and O. J. Sharp. Compiler transformations for high performance computing. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(4):345-420, December 1994.
4. M. Burke and R. Cytron. Interprocedural dependence analysis and parallelization. In Proceedings of the SIGPLAN’86 Symposium on Compiler Construction, Palo Alto, CA, June 1986.
5. D. Callahan. A Global Approach to Detection of Parallelism. PhD thesis, Dept of Computer Science, Rice University, March 1987.
6. M. Chen and J. Cowie. Prototyping Fortran-90 compilers for massively parallel machines. In Proceedings of the SIGPLAN’92 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, San Francisco, CA, June 1992.
7. High Performance Fortran Forum. High Performance Fortran language specification. Scientific Programming, 2(1-2):1-170, 1993.
8. E Lewis, C. Lin, and L. Snyder. The implementation and evaluation of fusion and contraction in array languages. In Proceedings of the SIGPLAN’98 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, Montreal, Canada, June 1998.
9. John D. Mc Calpin. A case study of some issues in the optimization of Fortran 90 array notation. Scientific Programming, 5:219-237, 1996.
10. G. Roth. Optimizing Fortran90D/HPF for Distributed-Memory Computers. PhD thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, Rice University, April 1997.
11. G. Roth and K. Kennedy. Dependence analysis of Fortran90 array syntax. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications (PDPTA’96), Sunnyvale, CA, August 1996.
12. G. Roth and K. Kennedy. Loop fusion in High Performance Fortran. In Proceedings of the 1998 ACM International Conference on Supercomputing, Melbourne, Australia, July 1998.
13. G. Sabot, D. Gingold, and J. Marantz. CM Fortran optimization notes: Slicewise model. Technical Report TMC-184, Thinking Machines Corporation, March 1991.
14. J. Warren. A hierachical basis for reordering transformations. In Conference Record of the Eleventh Annual ACM Symposium on the Principles of Programming Languages, Salt Lake City, UT, January 1984.
15. M. J. Wolfe. Optimizing Supercompilers for Supercomputers. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1989.
16. M. J. Wolfe. High Performance Compilers for Parallel Computing. Addison- Wesley, Redwood City, CA, 1996.