Inline XBRL versus XBRL for SEC reporting

Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 189-199

  Basoglu, Kamile Asli ^a   White, Clinton E Skip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Financial reporting; Inline XBRL; XBRL

Indexed keywords

EID: 84956959470     PISSN: 15541908     EISSN: 15587940     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/jeta-51254     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Advisory Committee on Small and Emerging Companies (ACSEC). 2013. Advisory Committee on Small and Emerging Companies Meeting. Sponsored by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.sec.gov/info/smallbus/acsec/acsectranscript-020113.pdf.
2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2009. SOP-1 Performing Agreed-Upon Procedures Engagements That Address the Completeness, Accuracy, or Consistency of XBRLTagged Data. XBRL Task Force. Available at: https://www.ifac.org/system/files/meetings/files/20100614-IAASB-Agenda%20Item_8B-AICPA_SOP_09_1-final.pdf.
3. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2013. SOP 13-2 Performing Agreed-Upon Procedures Engagements that Address the Completeness, Mapping, Consistency, or Structure of XBRL-Formatted Information. Available at: http://www.aicpa.org/interestareas/frc/accountingfinancialreporting/xbrl/pages/sop13-2performingagreed-uponprocedures.aspx.
4. Boritz, J. E., and W. G. No. 2008. The SEC’s XBRL voluntary filing program on EDGAR: A case for quality assurance. Current Issues in Auditing 2 (2): A36–A50.
5. Boritz, J. E., and W. G. No. 2009. Assurance on XBRL-related documents: The Case of United Technologies Corporation. Journal of Information Systems 23 (2): 49–78.
6. Chasan, E. 2013. XBRL error rate seen as growing pains. CFO Magazine. Available at: http://blogs.wsj.com/cfo/2013/02/08/xbrl-error-rate-seen-as-growing-pains/.
7. Cohen, E. E., R. S. Debreceny, and S. Farewell. 2014. Issues with the communication and integrity of audit reports when financial reporting shifts to an information-centric paradigm. International Journal of Information Systems 15 (4): 400–422.
8. Debreceny, R. S., A. Chandra, J. J. Cheh, D. Guithues-Amrhein, N. J. Hannon, P. D. Hutchison, D. Janvrin, R. A. Jones, B. Lamberton, A. Lymer, M. Mascha, R. Nehmer, S. Roohani, R. P. Srivastava, S. Trabelsi, T. Tribunella, G. Trites, and M. A. Vasarhelyi. 2005. Financial reporting in XBRL on the SEC’s EDGAR system: A critique and evaluation. Journal of Information Systems 19 (2): 191–210.
9. Debreceny, R., S. Farewell, M. Piechocki, C. Felden, and A. Gräning. 2010. Does it add up? Early evidence on the data quality of XBRL filings to the SEC. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 29 (3): 296–306.
10. Debreceny, R., S. Farewell, M. Piechocki, C. Felden, A. Gräning, and A. d’Eri. 2011. Flex or break? Extensions in XBRL disclosures to the SEC. Accounting Horizons 25 (4): 631–657.
11. Diamond, D. W., and R. E. Verrecchia. 1991. Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capital. Journal of Finance 46 (4): 1325–1359.
12. Harris, T., and S. Morsfield. 2012. An Evaluation of the Current State and Future of XBRL and Interactive Data for Investors and Analysts. White Paper Number 3, Columbia University.
13. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC). 2011. XBRL Guide for UK businesses. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/366133/xbrl-guide.pdf.
14. Investor Advisory Committee (IAC). 2013. Investor Advisory Committee Meeting. (July 25). Sponsored by the Securities and Exchange Commission Investor Advisory Committee. Available at: http://www.sec.gov/news/otherwebcasts/2013/iac072513.shtml.
15. Pinsker, R., and S. Li. 2008. Costs and benefits of XBRL adoption: Early evidence. Communications of the ACM 51 (3): 47–50.
16. Plumlee, R. D., and M. A. Plumlee. 2008. Assurance on XBRL for financial reporting. Accounting Horizons 22 (3): 353–368.
17. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2005. Staff Questions and Answers, Attest Engagements Regarding XBRL Financial Information Furnished Under the XBRL Voluntary Financial Reporting Program on the EDGAR System. Washington, DC: PCAOB.
18. Rosenbaum, D. 2011. XBRL: What’s it good for? CFO Magazine. Available at: http://ww2.cfo.com/applications/2011/07/xbrl-whats-it-good-for/.
19. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2009. Interactive Data to Improve Financial Reporting, Final Rule. Available at: http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2009/33-9002.pdf.
20. Trainer, D. 2013. XBRL would be wonderful if it always worked. Forbes. Available at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2013/11/07/xbrl-would-be-wonderful-if-it-always-worked/.
21. XBRL. 2013. XII, X. I. XBRL International Seeks Feedback on Inline XBRL. Available at: http://www.xbrl.org/news.
22. XBRL U.K. 2015. Inline XBRL Saving Cost and Effort for Company Reporting. Available at: http://www.xbrl.org.uk/resources/whitepapers/inlineXBRL-benefits-v1.pdf.
23. Vessey, I. 1991. Cognitive fit: A theory-based analysis of the graphs versus tables literature. Decision Sciences 22 (2): 219–240.
24. Yoon, H., H. Zo, and A. P. Ciganek. 2011. Does XBRL adoption reduce information asymmetry? Journal of Business Research 64 (2): 157–163.