A Quick Introduction to Version Control with Git and GitHub

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Blischak, John D ^a   Davenport, Emily R ^b   Wilson, Greg ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^c Software Carpentry Foundation   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VERSION CONTROL;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL LITERATURE; ONLINE SYSTEM; PUBLICATION; WEB BROWSER; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER LANGUAGE; EDUCATION; HUMAN; SOFTWARE;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84956756030     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004668     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Ram K, Git can facilitate greater reproducibility and increased transparency in science. Source Code Biol Med. 2013 Feb;8:7. doi: 10.1186/1751-0473-8-7 23448176
2. Wilson G, Aruliah D, Brown C, Chue HN, Davis M, Guy R, et al. Best practices for scientific computing. PLoS Biol. 2014 Jan;12:e1001745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001745 24415924
3. ENCODE Project ConsortiumBernstein B, Birney E, Dunham I, Green E, Gunter C, et al. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012 Sep;489:57–74. doi: 10.1038/nature11247 22955616
4. Bailey T, Krajewski P, Ladunga I, Lefebvre C, Li Q, Liu T, et al. Practical guidelines for the comprehensive analysis of ChIP-seq data. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013 null;9:e1003326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003326 24244136
5. Noble W, A quick guide to organizing computational biology projects. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Jul;5:e1000424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000424 19649301
6. Morin A, Urban J, Sliz P, A quick guide to software licensing for the scientist-programmer. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012 null;8:e1002598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002598 22844236