Species variation in the degree of sex differences in brain and behaviour related to birdsong: Adaptations and constraints

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 371, Issue 1688, 2016, Pages

  Ball, Gregory F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Canary; HVC; Sexual selection; Song control system

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; BRAIN; PHENOTYPE; SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL SELECTION; SONGBIRD;

EUOPHRYS; TAENIOPYGIA GUTTATA; TROGLODYTINAE; VERTEBRATA;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; BRAIN; FEMALE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; VOCALIZATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BRAIN; FEMALE; MALE; SEX FACTORS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 84956664928     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0117     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Nottebohm F, Arnold AP. 1976 Sexual dimorphism in vocal control areas of the songbird brain. Science 194, 211-213. (doi:10.1126/science.959852)
2. Ball GF, MacDougall-Shackleton SA. 2001 Sex differences in songbirds 25 years later: what have we learned and where do we go? Microsc. Res. Tech. 54, 327-334. (doi:10.1002/jemt.1146)
3. Nottebohm F. 1980 Brain pathways for vocal learning in birds: a review of the first 10 years. In Progress in psychobiology and physiological psychology (eds JM Sprague, AN Epstein), pp 85-214. New York, NY: Academic Press.
4. Nottebohm F. 2015 Fernando Nottebohm. In History of neuroscience in autobiography, vol. 8. (ed. L Squire), pp 324-360. Washington, DC: Society for Neuroscience.
5. Stokes TM, Leonard CM, Nottebohm F. 1974 The telencephalon, diencephalon, and mesencephalon of the canary, Serinus canaria, in stereotaxic coordinates. J. Comp. Neurol. 156, 337-374. (doi:10.1002/cne.901560305)
6. Phoenix CH, Goy RW, Gerall AA, Young WC. 1959 Organizing action of prenatally administered testosterone propionate on the tissues mediating mating behavior in the female guinea pig. Endocrinology 65, 369-382. (doi:10.1210/endo-65-3-369)
7. Raisman G, Field PM. 1971 Sexual dimorphism in the preoptic area of the rat. Science 173, 731-733. (doi:10.1126/science.173.3998.731)
8. Fee M, Scharff C. 2010 The songbird as a model for the generation and learning of complex sequential behaviors. ILAR J. 51, 362-377. (doi:10.1093/ilar.51.4.362)
9. Gorski RA, Harlan RE, Jacobson CD, Shryne JE, Southam AM. 1980 Evidence for the existence of a sexually dimorphic nucleus in the preoptic area of the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 193, 529-539. (doi:10.1002/cne.901930214)
10. Arnold AP, Gorski RA. 1984 Gonadal steroid induction of structural sex differences in the central nervous system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 413-442. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.07.030184.002213)
11. Dale J, Dey CJ, Delhey K, Kempenaers B, Valcu M. 2015 The effects of life history and sexual selection on male and female plumage colouration. Nature 527, 367-370. (doi:10.1038/nature15509)
12. Barker FK, Cibois A, Schikler P, Feinstein J, Cracraft J. 2004 Phylogeny and diversification of the largest avian radiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 11040-11045. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0401892101)
13. Brenowitz E, Margoliash D, Nordeen KW. 1997 An introduction to birdsong and the avian song system. J. Neurobiol. 33, 495-500. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(19971105)33:5,495::AID-NEU1.3.0.CO;2-#)
14. Farries MA, Perkel DJ. 2008 The songbird brain in comparative perspective. In Neuroscience of birdsong (eds HP Zeigler, P Marler), pp 63-72. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Liu W-C, Wada K, Jarvis E, Nottebohm F. 2013 Rudimentary substrates for vocal learning in a suboscine. Nat. Commun. 4, 2082. (doi:10.1038/ncomms3082)
16. Ball GF. 1994 Neurochemical specializations associated with vocal learning and production in songbirds and budgerigars. Brain Behav. Evol. 44, 234-246. (doi:10.1159/000113579)
17. Bernard DJ, Casto JM, Ball GF. 1993 Sexual dimorphism in the volume of song control nuclei in European starlings: assessment by a Nissl stain and autoradiography for muscarinic cholinergic receptors. J. Comp. Neurol. 334, 559-570. (doi:10.1002/cne.903340405)
18. De Vries GJ, Sodersten P. 2009 Sex differences in the brain: the relation between structure and function. Horm. Behav. 55, 589-596. (doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.03.012)
19. Garamszege LZ, Eens M. 2004 Brain space for a learned task: strong intraspecific evidence for neural correlates of singing behavior in songbirds. Brain Res. Rev. 2044, 187-193. (doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2003.12.001)
20. Nottebohm F, Kasparian S, Pandazis C. 1981 Brain space for a learned task. Brain Res. 213, 99-109. (doi:10.1016/0006-8993(81)91250-6)
21. Canady RA, Kroodsma DE, Nottebohm F. 1984 Population differences in the complexity of a learned skill are correlated with the brain space involved. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 81, 6232-6234. (doi:10.1073/pnas.81.19.6232)
22. Brenowitz EA, Lent K, Kroodsma DE. 1995 Brain space for learned song in birds develops independently of song learning. J. Neurosci. 9, 6281-6286.
23. Kirn JR, Clower RP, Kroodsma DE, Devoogd TJ. 1989 Song-related brain regions in the red-winged blackbird are affected by sex and season but not repertoire size. J. Neurobiol. 20, 139-163. (doi:10.1002/neu.480200304)
24. Bernard DJ, Eens M, Ball GF. 1996 Age-and behavior-related variation in the volume of song control nuclei in male European starlings. J. Neurobiol. 30, 329-339. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(199607)30:3,329::AID-NEU2.3.0.CO;2-6)
25. DeVoogd TJ, Krebs JR, Healy SD, Purvis A. 1993 Relations between song repertoire size and the volume of brain nuclei related to song: comparative evolutionary analyses amongst oscine birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 254, 75-82. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1993.0129)
26. Moore JM, Szekely T, Buki J, DeVoogd TJ. 2011 Motor pathway convergence predicts syllable repertoire size in oscine birds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci USA 108, 16 440-16 445. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1102077108)
27. Levin RN. 1996 Song behavior and reproductive strategies in a duetting wren, Thryothorus migricapillus: I. Removal studies. Anim. Behav. 52, 1093-1106. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0257)
28. Levin RN. 1996 Song behavior and reproductive strategies in a duetting wren, Thryothorus nigricapillus; II. Playback studies. Anim. Behav. 52, 1107-1117. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0258)
29. Logue DM, Hall ML. 2014 Migration and the evolution of duetting in songbirds. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20140103. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0103)
30. Brenowitz EA, Arnold AP, Levin RN. 1985 Neural correlates of female song in tropical duetting birds. Brain Res. 343, 104-112. (doi:10.1016/0006-8993(85)91163-1)
31. Gurney ME. 1981 Hormonal control of cell form and number in the zebra finch song system. J. Neurosci. 1, 658-673.
32. Brenowitz EA, Arnold AP. 1986 Interspecific comparisons of the size of neural song control regions and song complexity in duetting birds: evolutionary implications. J. Neurosci. 6, 2875-2879.
33. Harvey PH, Pagel MD. 1991 The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
34. Martins EP. (ed.) 1996 Phylogenies and the comparative method in animal behavior. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35. Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE. 1990 Phylogeny and classification of birds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36. MacDougMall-Shackleton SA, Ball GF. 1999 Comparative studies of sex differences in the song-control system of songbirds. Trends Neurosci. 22, 432-436. (doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(99)01434-4)
37. Nealen PM, Perkel DJ. 2000 Sexual dimorphism in the song system of the Carolina wren Thryothorus ludovicianus. J. Comp. Neurol. 418, 346-360. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(20000313)418:3,346::AID-CNE8.3.0.CO;2-K)
38. Gahr M, Güttinger H-R. 1986 Functional aspects of singing in male and female Uraeginthus bengalus (Estrildidae). Ethology 72, 123-131. (doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1986.tb00612.x)
39. Gahr M, Sonnenschein E, Wickler W. 1998 Sex difference in the size of the neural song control regions in a dueting songbird with similar song repertoire size of males and females. J. Neurosci. 18, 1124-1131.
40. Gahr M, Metzdorf R, Schmidl D, Wickler W. 2008 Bi-directional sexual dimorphisms of the song control nucleus HVC in a songbird with unison song. PLoS ONE 3, e3073. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003073)
41. Voigt C, Gahr M. 2011 Social status affects the degree of sex difference in the songbird brain. PLoS ONE 6, e20723. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020723)
42. Wang R, Sun Y, Zhang X, Zeng S, Xie W, Yu Y, Zhang X, Zuo M. 2009 Song control nuclei in male and female large-billed crows (Corvus macrorhynchos). Zool. Sci. 26, 771-777. (doi:10.2108/zsj.26.771)
43. Hall ZJ, MacDougall-Shackleton SA, Osorio-Beristain M, Murphy TG. 2010 Male bias in the song control system despite female bias in song rate in streak- backed orioles (Icterus pustulatus). Brain Behav. Evol. 76, 168-175. (doi:10.1159/000320971)
44. McCasland JS, Konishi M. 1981 Interaction between auditory and motor activities in an avian song control nucleus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 7815-7819. (doi:10.1073/pnas.78.12.7815)
45. Margoliash D. 1983 Acoustic parameters underlying the responses of song-specific neurons in the white-crowned sparrow. J. Neurosci. 3, 1039-1057.
46. Margoliash D, Konishi M. 1985 Auditory representation of autogenous song in the song system of white- crowned sparrows. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 82, 5997-6000. (doi:10.1073/pnas.82.17.5997)
47. Prather JF, Mooney R. 2008 Song-selective neurons in the songbird brain: synaptic mechanisms and functional roles. In Neuroscience of birdsong (eds HP Zeigler, P Marler), pp 174-186. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48. Diekamp BM, Ball GF, Fortune ES. 2004 Auditory responses in HVc of urethane-anesthetized male and female canaries. Program No. 333.1 Neuroscience Meeting Planner. San Diego, CA: Society for Neuroscience.
49. Fortune ES, Rodriguez C, Li D, Ball GF, Coleman MJ. 2011 Neural mechanisms for the coordination of duet singing in wrens. Science 334, 666-670. (doi:10.1126/science.1209867)
50. Ball GF, Balthazart J, McCarthy MM. 2014 Is it useful to view the brain as a secondary sexual characteristic? Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 46, 628-638. (doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.08.009)
51. Collins S. 2004 Vocal fighting and flirting: the functions of birdsong. In Nature‘s music: the science of birdsong (eds P Marler, H Slbbekoorn), pp 39-79. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Academic Press.
52. Airey DC, Buchanan KL, Szekely T, Catchpole CK, 8 DeVoogd TJ. 2000 Song, sexual selection, and a song control nucleus (HVc) in the brains of European sedge warblers. J. Neurobiol. 44, 6. (doi:10.1002/1097-4695(200007)44:1,1::AID-NEU1.3.0.CO;2-V)
53. Odom KJ, Hall ML, Riebel K, Omland KE, Langmore NE. 2014 Female song is widespread and ancestral in songbirds. Nat. Commun. 5, 3379 (doi:10.1038/ncomms4379)
54. Brenowitz EA. 1991 Altered perception of species-specific song by female birds after lesions of a forebrain nucleus. Science 251, 303-305. (doi:10.1126/science.1987645)
55. Nottebohm F. 1980 Testosterone triggers growth of brain vocal control nuclei in adult female canaries. Brain Res. 189, 429-436. (doi:10.1016/0006-8993(80)90102-X)
56. Madison FN, Rouse ML, Balthazart J, Ball GF. 2014 Reversing song behavior phenotype: testosterone driven induction of singing and measures of song quality in adult male and female canaries (Serinus canaria). Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 215, 61-75. (doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2014.09.008)
57. Voigt C, Goymann W. 2007 Sex-role reversal is reflected in the brain of African black coucals (Centropus grillii). Dev. Neurobiol. 67, 1560-1573. (doi:10.1002/dneu.20528)
58. Rosvall KA, Buergeon Burns, CM, Barske J, Goodson JL, Schlinger BA, Sengelaub DR, Ketterson ED. 2012 Neural sensitivity to sex steroids predicts individual differences in aggression: implications for behavioural evolution. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 3547-3355. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.0442)
59. Ketterson ED, Nolan V, Sandell M. 2005 Testosterone in females: mediator of adaptive traits, constraint on sexual dimorphism, or both? Am. Nat. 166, S85-S98. (doi:10.1086/444602)
60. McCarthy MM, Pickett LA, Van Ryzin JW, Kight KE. 2015.2015 Surprising origins of sex differences in the brain. Horm. Behav. 76, 3-10. (doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.04.013)
61. Ball GF, Castelino CB, Maney DL, Appeltants D, Balthazart J. 2004 The activation of birdsong by testosterone: multiple sites of action and role of ascending catecholamine projections. In Steroids and the nervous system (eds GC Panzica, RC Melcangi) Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1007, pp 211-231. (doi:10.1196/annal.1298.043)