The first cut is the deepest: repeated interactions of coauthorship and academic productivity in Nobel laureate teams

Scientometrics

Volumn 106, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 509-524

  Chan, Ho Fai ^a   Önder, Ali Sina ^b   Torgler, Benno ^a,c  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BAYREUTH   (Germany)

^c CREMA CENTER FOR RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Innovation; Nobel laureates; Scientific collaboration; Team formation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84956634673     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1796-y     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Adams, J. D., Black, G. C., Clemmons, J. R., & Stephan, P. E. (2005). Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981–1999. Research Policy,34, 259–285.
2. Biswal, A. K. (2013). An absolute index (Ab-index) to measure a researcher’s useful contributions and productivity. PLoS ONE,8(12), e84334.
3. Chan, H. F., Önder, A. S., & Torgler, B. (2015). Do Nobel laureates change their patterns of collaboration following the prize reception? Scientometrics, 105(3), 2215–2235.
4. Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,52(7), 558–569.
5. Greene, M. (2007). The demise of the lone author. Nature,450, 1165.
6. Guimera, R., Uzzi, B., Spiro, J., & Amaral, L. A. N. (2005). Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science,308, 697–702.
7. Hollis, A. (2001). Co-authorship and the output of academic economists. Labour Economics,8(4), 503–530.
8. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy,26, 1–18.
9. Milojević, S. (2014). Principles of scientific research team formation and evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,111, 3984–3989.
10. Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Who is the best connected scientist? A study of scientific coauthorship networks. In E. Ben-Naim, H. Frauenfelder, & Z. Toroczkai (Eds.), Complex networks (pp. 337–370). Berlin: Springer.
11. Stallings, J., Vance, E., Yang, J., Vannier, M. W., Liang, J., Pang, L., et al. (2013). Determining scientific impact using a collaboration index. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,110, 9680–9685.
12. Uzzi, B., Mukherjee, S., Stringer, M., & Jones, B. (2013). Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science,342, 468–472.
13. Whitfield, J. (2008). Group theory. Nature,455, 720–723.
14. Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science,316, 1036–1039.
15. Zuckerman, H. (1996). Scientific Elite: Nobel laureates in the united states. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.