Neonicotinoid insecticide residues in soil dust and associated parent soil in fields with a history of seed treatment use on crops in southwestern Ontario

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 303-310

  Limay Rios, Victor ^a   Forero, Luis Gabriel ^a   Xue, Yingen ^a   Smith, Jocelyn ^a   Baute, Tracey ^b   Schaafsma, Arthur ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS   (Canada)

Author keywords

Clothianidin; Concentration; Pesticide; Surface; Thiamethoxam

Indexed keywords

CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); CROPS; CULTIVATION; DRUG PRODUCTS; DUST; ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION; INSECTICIDES; IONIZATION OF LIQUIDS; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PESTICIDES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEED; SURFACES;

CLOTHIANIDIN; ENVIRONMENTAL MATRIXES; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY ELECTROSPRAY; MEAN CONCENTRATIONS; NEONICOTINOID INSECTICIDES; NEONICOTINOIDS; NON-TARGET ORGANISM; THIAMETHOXAM;

SOILS;

CLOTHIANIDIN; NEONICOTINOID; PESTICIDE RESIDUE; THIAMETHOXAM; ((E)-1-(2-CHLORO-1,3-THIAZOL-5-YLMETHYL)-3-METHYL-2-NITROGUANIDINE); CHOLINERGIC RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; DUST; GUANIDINE DERIVATIVE; INSECTICIDE; NITRO DERIVATIVE; OXAZINE DERIVATIVE; SOIL; SOIL POLLUTANT; THIAZOLE DERIVATIVE;

CLOTHIANIDIN; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); CROP PRODUCTION; DUST; NEONICOTINOID PESTICIDE; PESTICIDE RESIDUE; POLLUTANT TRANSPORT; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL SURFACE; SOIL TEST; THIAMETHOXAM; TOPSOIL;

ARTICLE; CANADA; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); DUST; ELECTROSPRAY MASS SPECTROMETRY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; LIMIT OF DETECTION; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MAIZE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEED TREATMENT; SOIL POLLUTION; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURFACE SOIL; AGRICULTURE; ANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; ECOSYSTEM; HALF LIFE TIME; ONTARIO; PLANT SEED; SOIL; SOIL POLLUTANT;

ZEA MAYS;

AGRICULTURE; CHOLINERGIC AGENTS; DUST; ECOSYSTEM; GUANIDINES; HALF-LIFE; INSECTICIDES; NITRO COMPOUNDS; ONTARIO; OXAZINES; PESTICIDE RESIDUES; SEEDS; SOIL; SOIL POLLUTANTS; THIAZOLES; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84956582829     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: 15528618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etc.3257     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Elbert A, Haas M, Springer B, Thielert W, Nauen R. 2008. Applied aspects of neonicotinoid uses in crop protection. Pest Manag Sci 64:1099-1105.
2. Jeschke P, Nauen R, Schindler M, Elbert A. 2011. Overview of the status and global strategy for neonicotinoids. J Agric Food Chem 59:2897-2908.
3. Casida JE, Quistad GB. 2014. Why insecticides are more toxic to insects than people: The unique toxicology of insects. J Pestic Sci 29:81-86.
4. Stewart G, Baute T. 2013. Neonicotinoids and field crop production in Ontario. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. Guelph, Ontario, Canada. [Cited 2015 January 24]. Available from: http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/about/beehealthpresentations/omafcrop.pdf
5. Nault BA, Taylor AG, Urwiler M, Rabaey T, Hutchison WD. 2004. Neonicotinoid seed treatments for managing potato leafhopper infestations in snap bean. Crop Prot 23:147-154.
6. Nuyttens D, Devarrewaere W, Verboven P, Foqué D. 2013. Pesticide-laden dust emission and drift from treated seeds during seed drilling: A review. Pest Manag Sci 69:564-575.
7. Furlan L, Kreutzweiser D. 2014. Alternatives to neonicotinoid insecticides for pest control: Case studies in agriculture and forestry. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22:135-147.
8. Godfray HCJ, Blacquiere T, Field LM, Hails RS, Petrokofsky G, Potts SG, Raine NE, Vanbergen AJ, McLean AR. 2014. A restatement of the natural science evidence base concerning neonicotinoid insecticides and insect pollinators. Proc Biol Sci 281:20140558.
9. Bonmatin JM, Giorio C, Girolami V, Goulson D, Kreutzweiser DP, Krupke C, Liess M, Long E, Marzaro M, Mitchell EA, Noome DA, Simon-Delso N, Tapparo A. 2014. Environmental fate and exposure: Neonicotinoids and fipronil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:35-67.
10. Tapparo A, Marton D, Giorio C, Zanella A, Solda L, Marzaro M, Vivan L, Girolami V. 2012. Assessment of the environmental exposure of honeybees to particulate matter containing neonicotinoid insecticides coming from corn coated seeds. Environ Sci Technol 46:2592-2599.
11. European Food Safety Authority. 2013. Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for bees for the active substance thiamethoxam. EFSA J 11:3067.
12. Health Canada. 2013. Evaluation of Canadian bee mortalities in 2013 related to neonicotinoid pesticides. Ottawa, Canada. [Cited 2015 January 24]. Available from: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/cps-spc/pubs/pest/_fact-fiche/bee_mortality-mortalite_abeille-eng.php
13. Krupke CH, Hunt GJ, Eitzer BD, Andino G, Given K. 2012. Multiple routes of pesticide exposure for honey bees living near agricultural fields. PloS One 7:e9268.
14. Dively GP, Kamel A. 2012. Insecticide residues in pollen and nectar of a cucurbit crop and their potential exposure to pollinators. J Agric Food Chem 60:4449-4456.
15. Stoner KA, Eitzer BD. 2012. Movement of soil-applied imidacloprid and thiamethoxam into nectar and pollen of squash (Cucurbita pepo). PloS One 7:e39114.
16. Hoffmann EJ, Castle SJ. 2012. Imidacloprid in melon guttation fluid: A potential mode of exposure for pest and beneficial organisms. J Econ Entomol 105:67-71.
17. Pistorius J, Brobyn T, Campbell P, Forster R, Lortsch J, Marolleau F, Maus C, Luckmann J, Suzuki H, Wallner K, Becker R. 2011. Assessment of risks to honey bees posed by guttation. Abstracts, 11th International Symposium of the ICP-BR Bee Protection Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands, November 2-4. pp 199-208.
18. Huseth AS, Groves RL. 2014. Environmental fate of soil applied neonicotinoid insecticides in an irrigated potato agroecosystem. PloS One 9:e97081.
19. Main AR, Headley JV, Peru KM, Michel NL, Cessna AJ, Morrissey CA. 2014. Widespread use and frequent detection of neonicotinoid insecticides in wetlands of Canada's prairie pothole region. PloS One 9:e92821.
20. Schaafsma A, Limay-Rios V, Baute T, Smith J, Xue Y. 2015. Neonicotinoid insecticide residues in surface water and soil associated with commercial maize (corn) fields in southwestern Ontario. PloS One 10:e0118139.
21. Gupta S, Gajbhiye VT, Gupta RK. 2008. Soil dissipation and leaching behavior of a neonicotinoid insecticide thiamethoxam. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 80:431-437.
22. Jones A, Harrington P, Turnbull G. 2014. Neonicotinoid concentrations in arable soils after seed treatment applications in preceding years. Pest Manag Sci 70:1780-1784.
23. Cessna AJ, Larney FJ, Kerr LA, Bullock MS. 2006. Transport of trifluralin on wind-eroded sediment. Can J Soil Sci 86:545-554.
24. Rogge WF, Medeiros PM, Simoneit BRT. 2007. Organic marker compounds in surface soils of crop fields from the San Joaquin Valley fugitive dust characterization study. Atmos Environ 41:8183-8204.
25. Clay SA, DeSutter TM, Clay DE. 2001. Herbicide concentration and dissipation from surface wind-erodible soil. Weed Sci 49:431-436.
26. Larney FJ, Leys JF, Muller JF, McTainsh GH. 1999. Dust and endosulfan deposition in a cotton-growing area of northern New South Wales, Australia. J Environ Qual 28:692-701.
27. Larney FJ, Cessna AJ, Bullock MS. 1999. Herbicide transport on wind-eroded sediment. J Environ Qual 28:1412-1421.
28. Schaafsma A, Limay-Rios V, Xue Y, Smith J, Baute T. 2016. Field-scale examination of neonicotinoid insecticide persistence in soil as a result of seed treatment use in commercial maize (corn) fields in southwestern Ontario. Environ Toxicol Chem 35:295-302 (this issue).
29. Nauen R, Ebbinghaus-Kintscher U, Salgado VL, Kaussmann M. 2003. Thiamethoxam is a neonicotinoid precursor converted to clothianidin in insects and plants. Pestic Biochem Physiol 76:55-69.
30. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization. 2011. Pesticide residues in food 2010. Evaluations part I-Residues. Rome, Italy. [Cited 2015 September 10]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/Pests_Pesticides/JMPR/Evaluation10/Thiamethoxam.pdf
31. Lund R. 1975. Tables for an approximate test for outliers in linear models. Technometrics 60:473-476.
32. Currie LA. 1999. Nomenclature in evaluation of analytical methods including detection and quantification capabilities (IUPAC Recommendations 1995). Anal Chim Acta 391:105-126.
33. European Commission. 2013. Method validation and quality control procedures for pesticide residues analysis in food and feed. EC SANCO/12571/2013. Brussels, Belgium.
34. Liu W, Zheng W, Ma Y, Liu KK. 2006. Sorption and degradation of imidacloprid in soil and water. J Environ Sci Health B 41:623-634.
35. Bajeer MA. 2012. Adsorption and leaching potential of imidacloprid pesticide through alluvial soil. Am J Anal Chem 03:604-611.
36. University of Hertfordshire. 2013. PPDB Pesticide Properties DataBase. University of Hertfordshire, UK. 2006-2013. [Cited 2015 January 24]. Available from: http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/ppdb/en/atoz.htm
37. Kurwadkar S, Wheat R, McGahan DG, Mitchell F. 2014. Evaluation of leaching potential of three systemic neonicotinoid insecticides in vineyard soil. J Contam Hydrol 170:86-94.
38. Holland JM. 2004. The environmental consequences of adopting conservation tillage in Europe: Reviewing the evidence. Agric Ecosyst Environ 103:1-25.
39. Katagi T. 2013. Soil column leaching of pesticides. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 221:1-105.
40. Barraclough D, Kearney T, Croxford A. 2005. Bound residues: Environmental solution or future problem? Environ Pollut 133:85-90.
41. Northcott GL, Jones KC. 2000. Experimental approaches and analytical techniques for determining organic compound bound residues in soil and sediment. Environ Pollut 108:19-43.