The use of referential constraints in structuring discourse

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 1231-1237

  Sereţan, Violeta ^a   Cristea, Dan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b ALEXANDRU IOAN CUZA UNIVERSITY OF IASI   (Romania)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS PROCESS; ANAPHORA RESOLUTION; DISCOURSE STRUCTURE; HIGH-PRECISION; LARGE AMOUNTS; REFERENCE LEVELS;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84956553702     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Cristea, D., 2000. An Incremental Discourse Parser Architecture. In D. Christodoulakis (Ed.) Proceedings of the Second International Conference - Natural Language Processing - NLP 2000, Patras, Greece Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1835, Springer.
2. Cristea, D., and Webber, B.L., 1997. Expectations in Incremental Discourse Processing. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Madrid.
3. Cristea, D., Ide, N., and Romary, L., 1998. Veins Theory: A Model of Global Discourse Cohesion and Coherence. In Proceedings of COLING-ACL'98 (pp. 281-85).
4. Cristea, D., Ide, N., Marcu, D., and Tablan, M.V., 2000. Discourse Structure and Co-Reference: An Empirical Study. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics COLING'2000, Saarbrueken.
5. Fox, B., 1987. Discourse Structure and Anaphora. Written and Conversational English. Cabbridge Studies in Linguistics, Cambridge University Press.
6. Grosz, B.J., and Sidner, C., 1986. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. In Computational Linguistics, 12(3):175-204.
7. Hirschman, L., and Chinchor, N., 1997. MUC-7 Co-reference Task Definition.
8. Ide, N., and Cristea, D., 2000. A Hierarchical Account of Referential Accessibility. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL'2000, Hong Kong.
9. Joshi, A., 1987. An introduction to Tree Adjoining Grammar. In A. Manaster-Rammer (ed.) Mathematics of Language.
10. Kurohashi, S., and Nagao, M., 1997. Automatic Detection of Discourse Structure by Checking Surface Information in Sentences. In Proceedings of Coling'97 (pp. 1123-1127).
11. Mann, W.C., and Thompson, S.A., 1988. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization. Text 8(3):243-281.
12. Marcu, D., 1997. The rhetorical parsing, summarization and generation of natural language texts. Ph. D. Thesis. Dept. of Computer Science, University of Toronto.
13. Marcu, D., 1999. A formal and computational synthesis of Grosz and Sidner's and Mann and Thompson's theories. In Workshop on Levels of Representation in Discourse. Edinburgh.
14. Marcu, D., 2000. The theory and practice of discourse parsing and summarization, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
15. Marcu, D., Amorrortu, E., and Romera, M., 1999. Experiments in Constructing a Corpus of Discourse Trees. In ACL'99 Workshop on Standards and Tools for Discourse Tagging, Maryland.
16. Moser, M., and Moore, J.D., 1996. Toward a synthesis of two accounts of discourse structure. In Computational Linguistics, 22(3):409-419.
17. O'Donnell, M., 1997. RST-Tool: An RST analysis tool. In Proceedings of the 6th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Duisburg, Germany.
18. Schauer, H., and Hahn, U., 2001. Anaphoric Cues for Coherence Relations. In Proceedings of RANLP'2001 (pp. 228-235).
19. Seretan, V., 2000. Considerations regarding the reconciliation of discourse structure with referential chains (in Romanian). Master Thesis, University of Iasi.
20. Vonk, W., Hustinx, L., and Simons, H.G., 1992. The use of referential expressions in structuring disocurse. In Language and Cognitive Processes, 7(3, 4):301-333.
21. Webber, B., 1991. Structure and ostension in the interpretation of discourse deixis. In Natural Language and Cognitive Processes 6(2):107-135.