Relation between encoding specificity and levels of processing

Levels of Processing in Human Memory

Volumn 5, Issue , 2014, Pages 405-427

  Tulving, Endel ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955666629     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315796192     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Anderson, J. R. Language, memory and thought. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1976.
2. Anderson, R. C., & Ortony, A. On putting apples into bottles-A problem of polysemy. Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 7, 167-180.
3. Anderson, R. C., Pichert, J. W., Goetz, E. T., Schallert, D. L., Stevens, K. V., & Trollip, S. R. Instantiation of general terms. Journal o f Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976, 15, 667-679.
4. Barclay, J. R., Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., McCarrell, N. S., & Nitsch, K. Comprehension and semantic flexibility. Journal o f Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974, 13, 471 - 481.
5. Bower, G. H. A multicomponent theory of the memory trace. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology o f learning and motivation (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press, 1967.
6. Bower, G. H. Organizational factors in memory. Cognitive Psychology, 1970, 1, 18-46.
7. Craik, F. I. M. A “ levels of analysis” view of memory. In P. Pliner, L. Krames, & T. M. Alloway (Eds.), Communication and affect: Language and thought. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
8. Craik, F. I. M. Depth of processing in recall and recognition. In S. Domic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977.
9. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal o f Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972, 11, 671-684.
10. Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal o f Experimental Psychology: General, 1975, 104, 268-294.
11. Crowder, R. G. Principles o f learning and memory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1976.
12. Fisher, R. P., & Craik, F. I. M. The interaction between encoding and retrieval operations in cued recall. Journal o f Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977, 3, 701-711.
13. Hyde, T. S., & Jenkins, J. J. Differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words. Journal o f Experimental Psychology, 1969, 82, 472-481.
14. Hyde, T. S., & Jenkins, J. J. Recall for words as a function of semantic, graphic, and syntactic orienting tasks. Journal o f Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973, 12, 471-480.
15. Jenkins, J. J. Can we have a theory of meaningful memory? In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola Symposium. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1974.
16. Kintsch, W. The representation o f meaning in memory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1974.
17. Lockhart, R. S., Craik, F. I. M., & Jacoby, L. Depth of processing, recognition and recall. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recall and recognition. London: Wiley, 1976.
18. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal o f Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977, 16, 519-533.
19. Moscovitch, M., & Craik, F. I. M. Depth of processing, retrieval cues, and uniqueness of encoding as factors in recall. Journal o f Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976, 15, 447-458.
20. Nelson, D. L., Wheeler, J. W. J., Borden, R. C., & Brooks, D. H. Levels of processing and cuing: Sensory versus meaning features. Journal o f Experimental Psychology, 1974, 103, 971-977.
21. Rabinowitz, J. C., Mandler, G., & Barsalou, L. W. Recognition failure: Another case of retrieval failure. Journal o f Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977, 16, 639-663.
22. Thomson, D. M., & Tulving, E. Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak and strong cues. Journal o f Experimental Psychology, 1970, 86, 255 - 262.
23. Till, R. E., & Jenkins, J. J. The effects of cued orienting tasks on the free recall of words. Journal o f Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973, 12, 489-498.
24. Tulving, E. Cue-dependent forgetting. American Scientist, 1974, 62, 74-82.
25. Tulving, E. Ecphoric processes in recall and recognition. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recall and recognition. London: Wiley, 1976.
26. Tulving, E., & Osier, S. Effectiveness of retrieval cues in memory for words. Journal o f Experimental Psychology, 1968, 77, 593-601.
27. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 1973, 80, 352-373.
28. Tulving, E., & Watkins, M. J. Structure of memory traces. Psychological Review, 1975, 82, 261-275.
29. Tulving, E., & Wiseman, S. Relation between recognition and recognition failure of recallable words. Bulletin o f the Psychonomic Society, 1975, 6, 79-82.
30. Underwood, B. J. Attributes of memory. Psychological Review, 1969, 76, 559-573.
31. Walsh, D. A., & Jenkins, J. J. Effects of orienting tasks on free recall in incidental learning: “Difficulty,” “ effort,” and “process” explanations. Journal o f Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973, 12, 481-488.
32. Woodworth, R. S. Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, 1938.