Cross-domain integrating and reasoning spaces for offsite nuclear emergency response

Safety Science

Volumn 85, Issue , 2016, Pages 99-116

  Xie, Tian ^a   Li, Cong Dong ^b   Wei, Yao Yao ^a   Jiang, Jian Jun ^a   Xie, Rui ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CHINA   (China)

^b JINAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Cross domain integration; Heterogeneity; Integrated reasoning; Interoperability verifying; Offsite nuclear emergency response; Space modeling

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; INTEROPERABILITY; MAPPING; NUCLEAR REACTOR ACCIDENTS; SEMANTIC WEB;

CROSS-DOMAIN; HETEROGENEITY; INTEGRATED REASONING; NUCLEAR EMERGENCY RESPONSE; SPACE MODELS;

EMERGENCY SERVICES;

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY INTEGRATION; COMMUNITY PROGRAM; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CROSS DOMAIN INTEGRATING AND REASONING SPACE; DECISION MAKING; DISASTER PLANNING; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; NUCLEAR ACCIDENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; SIMULATION; SOCIAL CARE; SOCIAL PROBLEM;

EID: 84955590437     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Beimel Dizza, Peleg Mor Using OWL and SWRL to represent and reason with situation-based access control policies. Data Knowl. Eng. 2011, 70:596-615.
2. Benamrane Y., Wybo J.L., Armand P. Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear accidents: what has changed in the use of atmospheric dispersion modeling?. J. Environ. Radioact. 2013, 126(11):239-252.
3. Britkov V., Sergeev G. Risk management: role of social factors in major industrial accidents. Saf. Sci. 1998, 30(1-2):173-181.
4. Dauer Lawrence T. Preparedness and response for a nuclear or radiological emergency. Health Phys. 2005, 88(2):175-176.
5. de Jesus J., Walker P., Grant M., Groom S. WPS orchestration using the Taverna workbench: the eScience approach. Comput. Geosci. 2012, 47:75-86.
6. Ding Xianghai, Shi Jingjing The research on the method of constructing BOM for small and medium assemble-to-order manufacturing enterprises. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 482-484:2174-2178.
7. Esra K.O., Esat K.K., Nihan K.C. Automated composition of web services with the abductive event calculus. Inf. Sci. 2010, 180:3589-3613.
8. Florian B., Elena B., Rafael M., Rejane S.P., Warren S. Incident and emergency centre of the IAEA. Health Phys. 2010, 98(6):779-783.
9. Gashti Mehdi Zekriyapanah Investigating SOAP and XML technologies in Web service. Int. J. Soft Comput. 2012, 3(4):15-19.
10. Gentner D. Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cogn. Sci. 1983, 7(1):155-170.
11. Hale Andrew A blaze: the story of Chernobyl: Piers Paul Read. Saf. Sci. 1994, 18(1):61-62.
12. IAEA, 2013. IAEA Response and Assistance Network. International Atomic Energy Agency [R].
13. Itoya, Seihiro, 2011. Framework for Nuclear Disaster Prevention in Japan, and Response to Fukushima accident [C]// JNES and NNSA: The 12th Sino - Japan Nuclear Safety Seminar. Dalian, China, August 30-31, 2011.
14. Jiang Zengqiang, Lin Juguang Study on multi-BOM system of MES based on product process configuration. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2012, 235:334-339.
15. Klusch Matthias, Fries Benedikt, Sycara Katia OWLS-MX: a hybrid Semantic Web service matchmaker for OWL-S services. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 2009, 7(2):121-133.
16. Koh S.C.L., Gunasekaran A., Goodman T. Drivers, barriers and critical success factors for ERPII implementation in supply chains: a critical analysis. J. Strat. Inform. Syst. 2011, 20(4):385-402.
17. Lezcano Leonardo, Sicilia Miguel-Angel, Rodríguez-Solano Carlos Integrating reasoning and clinical archetypes using OWL ontologies and SWRL rules. J. Biomed. Inform. 2011, 44:343-353.
18. Li Congdong, Xie Tian, Tang Yongli GMVN oriented S-BOX knowledge expression and reasoning framework. J. Intell. Manuf. 2014, 25(5):993-1011.
19. Martin D., Burstein M., Mcdermott D., et al. Bringing semantics to web services with OWL-S. World Wide Web J. 2007, 10(3):243-277.
20. Mustajoki Jyri, Hamalainen Raimo P., Sinkko Kari Interactive computer support in decision conferencing: two cases on off-site nuclear emergency management. Decis. Support Syst. 2007, 42(4):2247-2260.
21. Papazoglou Mike P., van den Heuvel Willem-Jan Service oriented architectures: approaches, technologies and research issues. VLDB J. 2007, 16(2):389-415.
22. Pautasso Cesare RESTful Web service composition with BPEL for REST. Data Knowl. Eng. 2009, 68(9):851-866.
23. Rangel Lina Escobar, Leveque Francois How Fukushima Dai-ichi core meltdown changed the probability of nuclear accidents?. Saf. Sci. 2014, 64:90-98.
24. Sengupta Kunal, Hitzler Pascal Web Ontology Language (OWL). Encyclopedia Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 2014, 10:2374-2378.
25. Pokraev Stanislav Vassilev Model-Driven Semantic Integration of Service-Oriented Applications 2009, Enschede, The Netherlands.
26. Torkul O., Calli I. An integrated real time MRP and group technology system. J. Intell. Manuf. 2004, 15(4):561-567.
27. Valero Valentin, Diaz Gregorio A barred operational semantics for a subset of WS-CDL with time restrictions. J. Logic Algebraic Program. 2009, 78(8):730-748.
28. Banuls Victor A., Turoff Murray, Hiltz Starr Roxanne Collaborative scenario modeling in emergency management through cross-impact. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80(9):1756-1774.
29. Wang Hongbing, Kang Zuling, Zhou Ning, Li Li A model checker for WS-CDL. J. Syst. Softw. 2010, 83(10):1651-1661.
30. Wieringa, R.J., 2003. Design Methods for Reactive Systems: Yourdon, Statemate, and the UML. Design Methods for Reactive Systems: Yourdon, Statemate, and the UML. Morgan Kaufmann. http://www.mkp.com/dmrs.
31. Wyld David C. The cloudy future of government IT: cloud computing and the public sector around the world. Int. J. Web & Seman. Technol. 2010, 1(1):1-20.
32. Zhuge Hai Semantic linking through spaces for cyber-physical-socio intelligence: a methodology. Artif. Intell. 2011, 175(5-6):988-1019.
33. Zhuge Hai, Xing Y. Probabilistic resource space model for managing resources in cyber-physical society. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2012, 5(3):404-421.
34. Zhuge Hai, Xing Yunpeng, Shi Peng Resource space model, OWL and database mapping and integration. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 2008, 8(4):20-50.