Towards a representation of the rhetorical structure of interrupted exchanges

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1036, Issue , 1996, Pages 106-124

  Daradoumis, Thanasis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Dialogue modelling; Rhetorical structure

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; DIALOGUE MODELLING; MODELING DYNAMIC PHENOMENA; POINT OF DEPARTURES; POTENTIAL REPRESENTATIONS; RHETORICAL STRUCTURE; RHETORICAL STRUCTURE THEORY; STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS;

TEXT PROCESSING;

EID: 84955576578     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-60800-1_26     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Berry, M. (1981). Towards layers of exchange structure for directive exchanges. Network 2. 23-32.
2. Carberry, S. (1990). Plan recognition in natural language dialogue. Cambridge. Mass. The MIT Press.
3. Cawsey, A. (1990) Generating communicative discourse. In: Current Research in Natural Language Generation. Dale, R., Mellish, C. and Zock, M. (Ed.). Academic Press. Boston, pp. 75-102.
4. Clark, H. and Schaefer, E. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science. 13. 259-294.
5. Daradoumis, T. (1992a). DRST: A "grammar" of exchange structure in dialogue modelling. Available as a Technical Report at the Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
6. Daradoumis, T. (1992b). An RST-based proposal for coherent treatment of interruptions in interactive discourse. Available as a TR at the "Univ Politècnica de Catalunya".
7. Daradoumis, T. & Verdejo, M.F. (1994). Using rhetorical relations in building a coherent conversational teaching session. In: Dialogue and Instruction. Beun, R.J., Baker, M.J. and Reiner, M. (Eds). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag (to appear).
8. Fawcett, P. and Davies, B. (1992). Monologue as a turn in dialogue: towards an integration of exchange structure and rhetorical structure theory. In: Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation. Dale, R., Hovy, E., Rösner, D. and Stock, O. (Ed.). (Proc. of the 6th Intern.WS on NLG. Trento, Italy, April 5-7). Springer-Verlag. pp. 151-166.
9. Grosz B. and Sidner, C. (1986). Attention, intention, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics. 12(3). 175-204.
10. Hovy, E. (1988). Planning coherent multisentential text. In Proc. of the 26th annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Buffalo, pp. 163-169.
11. Hovy, E. (1990). Unresolved issues in paragraph planning. In: Current Research in Natural Language Generation. Dale, R., Mellish, C. and Zock, M. (Ed.). Academic Press. London, pp. 17-45.
12. Hovy, E., Lavid, J., Maier, E., Vibhu, M. and Paris, C. (1992) Employing knowledge resources in a new text planner architecture. In: Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation. Dale, R., Hovy, E., Rösner, D. and Stock, O. (Ed.). (Proc. of the 6th Intern.WS on NLG. Trento, Italy, April 5-7). Springer-Verlag.
13. Lambert, L. and Carberry, S. (1991). A tripartite plan-based model of dialogue. In: Proc. of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Berkeley. California, pp. 47-54.
14. Lambert, L. and Carberry, S. (1992). Modeling negotiation subdialogues. In: Proc. of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Newark. De. pp. 193-200.
15. Litman, D. and Allen, J. (1987). A plan recognition model for subdialogues in conversation. Cognitive Science. 11. 163-200.
16. Litman, D. and Allen, J. (1990). Discourse processing and commonsense plans. In: Intention in Communication. Cohen, P., Morgan, J. and Pollack, M. (Ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. pp. 365-388.
17. Maier, E. and Hovy, E. (1991). A metafùnctionally motivated taxonomy for discourse structure relations. In: Proc. of the 3rd European Workshop on Language Generation, Judenstein, Austria.
18. Mann, W. and Thompson, S. (1988). Rhetorical Structure Theory: Towards a functional theory of text organization. TEXT, 8(3), 243-281 (also available as USC/Infonnation Sciences Ins titute. TR: RS-87-190).
19. Martin, J. R. (1991). English Text: System and Structure. Benjamin Press. Amsterdam.
20. Moore, J. and Paris, C. (1989). Planning text for advisory dialogues. In Proc. of the 27th Annual Meeting of the ACL. pp. 203-211.
21. Moore, J. and Pollack, M. (1992). A problem for RST: The need for multi-level discourse analysis, Computational Linguistics. 18(4). 537-544.
22. Pollack, M. E. (1986). Inferring domain plans in question-answering. PhD thesis. Univ. of Pennsylvania.
23. Redeker, G. (1991). Lexical markers of discourse structure. Linguistics 29.
24. Rösner, D. and Stede, M. (1992). Customizing RST for the automatic production of technical manuals. In: Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation. Dale, R., Hovy, E., Rösner, D. and Stock, O. (Ed.). (Proc. of the 6th Intern.WS on NLG. Trento, Italy, April 5-7). Springer-Verlag.
25. Scott, D. and Souza, C. (1990). Getting the message across in RST-based text generation. In: Current Research in Natural Language Generation. Dale., R., Mellish. C. and Zock, M. (Ed.). Academic Press. Boston. Ch 3.
26. Van Mareke, K. (1990). GTE-1 User Manual. Knowledge Technologies C.V. Brussels, Belgium.
27. Vander Linden, K., Cumming, S. and Martin, J. (1992). Using systems networks to build rhetorical structures. In: Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation. Dale, R., Hovy, E., Rösner, D. and Stock, O. (Ed.). (Proc. of the 6th Intern.WS on NLG. Trento, Italy, April 5-7). Springer-Verlag.