Biogas infrastructures from farm to regional scale, prospects of biogas transport grids

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 86, Issue , 2016, Pages 43-52

  Hengeveld, E J ^a,b   Bekkering, J ^b   van Gemert, W J T ^b   Broekhuis, A A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b HANZE UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Biogas grid; Biogas pipeline; Biogas transport; Fishbone lay out; Star lay out; Transport costs

Indexed keywords

COST REDUCTION; COSTS; ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM INTERCONNECTION; PULP DIGESTERS; STARS; TRANSPORTATION;

AGRICULTURAL AREAS; DECENTRALIZED ENERGY; DIFFERENT SIZES; EFFICIENCY INCREASE; LAY-OUT; PRODUCTION SITES; REGIONAL SCALE; TRANSPORT COSTS;

BIOGAS;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; BIOGAS; BIOMASS POWER; COST ANALYSIS; DECENTRALIZATION; ENERGY USE; FARM; GAS PIPELINE; GAS TRANSPORT; INFRASTRUCTURE; POWER GENERATION;

CHANDIPURA VIRUS;

EID: 84955568993     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: 18732909     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Martijn Verdonk (PBL) en Wouter Wetzels (ECN) Referentieraming energie en emissies: actualisatie 2012. Energie en emissies in de jaren 2012, 2020 en 2030 2012, Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving (PBL, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency), Den Haag, ISBN: 978-94-91506-12-3 PBL-publicatienummer: 500278001.
2. Dairy-Sustainability-Initiative; Break Through in Sustainability 2010 Report, Available on Request from (14 April 2015). http://dairysustainabilityframework.org/.
3. Gebrezgabher Solomie A., Meuwissen Miranda P.M., Oude Lansink Alfons G.J.M. Energy-neutral dairy chain in the Netherlands: an economic feasibility analysis. NJAS Wagening. J. Life Sci. 2010, 57:109-115.
4. Börjesson Martin, Ahlgren Erik O. Cost-effective biogas utilisation-a modelling assessment of gas infrastructural options in a regional energy system. Energy 2012, 48:212-226.
5. Oostra M., Jabloska B. Understanding Local Energy Initiatives and Preconditions for Business Opportunities 2015, E-Hub 2012 [cited 12 June. http://www.e-hub.org/pdf/UnderstandingLocalEnergyInitiativesPreconditionsBusinessOpportunities.pdf.
6. van der Schoor T., Scholtens B. Power to the people: local community initiatives and the transition to sustainable energy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 43:666-675.
7. Websites Local initiatives [cited 12 June 2015]: Hier opgewekt, website: ; Netwerk duurzame dorpen,website: ; Municipality Groningen, website: ; Klimaat verbond, website: ; Presentation Bionet, website: . http://groengas.nl/report/presentatie-bionet-de-cvketel-op-biogas/.
8. Hahn H., Krautkremer B., Hartmann K., Wachendorf M. Review of concepts for a demand-driven biogas supply for flexible power generation. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 383-393. 1;29(0).
9. BHKW-Kenndaten 2011, Report, ASUE e.V, Berlin.
10. SDE+ 2015 2015, Netherlands Enterprise Agency (RVO.nl), The Hague, [cited 11 December 2015]. Available from: website. http://english.rvo.nl/subsidies-programmes/stimulation-sustainable-energy-production-sde.
11. Hengeveld E.J., van Gemert W.J.T., Bekkering J., Broekhuis A.A. When does decentralized production of biogas and centralized upgrading and injection into the natural gas grid make sense?. Biomass Bioenergy 2014, 67:363-371.
12. Bekkering J., Broekhuis T.A., Van Gemert W.J.T. Operational modeling of a sustainable gas supply chain. Eng. Life Sci. 2010, 10(6):585-594.
13. Bojesen M., Birkin M., Clarke G. Spatial competition for biogas production using insights from retail location models. Energy 2014, 68:617-628.
14. Delzeit R., Kellner U. The impact of plant size and location on profitability of biogas plants in Germany under consideration of processing digestates. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 52:43-53.
15. Gebrezgabher S.A., Meuwissen M.P.M., Prins B.A.M., Lansink A.G.J.M.O. Economic analysis of anaerobic digestion-a case of green power biogas plant in the Netherlands. NJAS Wagening. J. Life Sci. 2010, 57(2):109-115.
16. Patterson T., Esteves S., Dinsdale R., Guwy A. Life cycle assessment of biogas infrastructure options on a regional scale. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102(15):7313-7323.
17. Pöschl M., Ward S., Owende P. Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways. Appl. Energy 2010, 87(11):3305-3321.
18. Börjesson P., Tufvesson L., Lantz M. Life Cycle Assessment of Biofuels in Sweden 2010, LUND UNIVERSITY Department of Technology and Society, Environmental and Energy Systems Studies, Lund, Report, ISBN 91 -88360-96-2.
19. 2 abatement costs of greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation by different biogas conversion pathways. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 114:13-25.
20. Hamedi M., Farahani R.Z., Husseini M.M., Esmaeilian G.R. A distribution planning model for natural gas supply chain: a case study. Energy Policy 2009, 37:799-812.
21. Alinia Kashani A.H., Molaei R. Techno-economical and environmental optimization of natural gas network operation. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2014, 92(11):2106-2122.
22. Borraz-Sanchez C. Optimization Methods for Pipeline Transportation of Natural Gas 2010, Phd thesis, University of Bergen, Bergen.
23. De Wolf D., Smeers Y. The gas transmission problem solved by an extension of the simplex algorithm. Manag. Sci. 2000, 46(11):1454-1465.
24. RNv Eekelen, EA Polman, HA Ophoff, Mvd Laan, New Networks for Biogas, Current Practices, Risks & Costs Aspects, Censured version. Available from: website: , cited on 12 June 2015. Apeldoorn, the Netherlands: Swedish Gas Centre, 2012. Report nr 110802108. http://www.sgc.se/ckfinder/userfiles/files/SGC264_English.pdf.
25. Klocke B., Pflaum H. Cooperation project: sustainable biogas at the lower rhine. GWF Gas Erdgas 2010, 151(11):786-793.
26. Cerbe G. Grundlagen der gastechnik: gasbeschaffung-gasverteilung-gasverwendung 2008, Hanser Verlag. seventh ed.
27. Weidenaar T. Designing the biomethane chain through automated synthesis 2014, Phd thesis, University of Twente, Enschede.
28. Holstein J., Jansen P., van Wingerden T. Visie document biogashub regio 2012, KEMA, Stedendriehoek West, Arnhem, Report reportnr. GCS.12.R.22956.