|
Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 4-5
|
Confronting Biospecimen Exceptionalism in Proposed Revisions to the Common Rule
a a a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
HUMAN;
PRIVACY;
ANONYMIZATION;
CONFIDENTIALITY;
ETHICS;
GOVERNMENT;
HEALTH CARE FACILITY;
IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION;
MANAGEMENT;
POLICY;
PSYCHOLOGY;
PUBLIC OPINION;
RESEARCH SUBJECT;
STANDARDS;
TRENDS;
UNITED STATES;
BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS;
CONFIDENTIALITY;
DATA ANONYMIZATION;
HUMANS;
PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION;
POLICY MAKING;
PUBLIC OPINION;
PUBLIC POLICY;
RESEARCH SUBJECTS;
UNITED STATES;
UNITED STATES DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES;
|
EID: 84955482789
PISSN: 00930334
EISSN: 1552146X
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1002/hast.528 Document Type: Note |
Times cited : (17)
|
References (7)
|