The Acid Test for Biological Science: STAP Cells, Trust, and Replication

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 147-167

  Lancaster, Cheryl ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Haruko Obokata; Misconduct; Replication; STAP cells; Trust

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BIOMEDICINE; ETHICS; HUMAN; JAPAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MOUSE; PERSONNEL; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PUBLISHING; REPRODUCIBILITY; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENCE; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; TRUST;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE DISCIPLINES; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; JAPAN; MICE; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; PUBLISHING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SCIENCE; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; TRUST;

EID: 84955460155     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: 14715546     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-015-9628-2     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Broad, W., & Wade, N. (1982). Betrayers of the truth: A fraud and deceit in the halls of science. New York: Simon and Schuster.
2. Cesari, F. (2014). Letter to professor Lee. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/259984904_Stimulus-triggered_fate_conversion_of_somatic_cells_into_pluripotency/reviews/103. Accessed 4 Sept 2014.
3. Chambers, C., & Sumner, P. (2012). Replication is the only solution to scientific fraud. The guardian.http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/sep/14/solution-scientific-fraud-replication. Accessed 8 April 2014.
4. Chen, Z.-X., & Riggs, A. D. (2011). DNA methylation and demethylation in Mammals. Journal of Biological Chemistry,286, 18347–18353.
5. Couzin-Frankel, J. (2013). The power of negative thinking. Science,342, 68–69.
6. Crocker, J., & Cooper, M. L. (2011). Addressing scientific fraud. Science,332, 1182.
7. Cyranoski, D. (2014a, 3 June). Genetic tests suggest STAP stem cells ‘never existed’. Nature. http://blogs.nature.com/news/2014/06/genetic-tests-suggest-stap-stem-cells-never-existed.html. Accessed 1 Oct 2014.
8. Cyranoski, D. (2014b, 17 Jun). Gene tests suggest acid-bath stem cells never existed. Nature. http://www.nature.com/news/gene-tests-suggest-acid-bath-stem-cells-never-existed-1.15425. Accessed 1 Oct 2014.
9. Cyranoski, D. (2014c, 3 Jul). Research integrity: Cell-induced stress. Nature. http://www.nature.com/news/research-integrity-cell-induced-stress-1.15507. Accessed 1 Oct 2014.
10. Cyranoski, D. (2014d, 13 Aug). Stem-cell pioneer blamed media ‘bashing’ in suicide note. Nature. http://www.nature.com/news/stem-cell-pioneer-blamed-media-bashing-in-suicide-note-1.15715. Accessed 1 Oct 2014.
11. Cyranoski, D. (2014e, 12 Sep). STAP co-author offers yet another recipe for stem cells. Nature. http://blogs.nature.com/news/2014/09/stap-co-author-offers-yet-another-recipe-for-stem-cells.html. Accessed 18 Oct 2014.
12. Endo, T. A. (2014). Quality control method for RNA-seq using single nucleotide polymorphism allele frequency. Genes to Cells,. doi:10.1111/gtc.12178.
13. Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. PNAS,109(42), 17028–17033.
14. Galison, P. (2008). Removing knowledge: The logic of modern censorship. In R. N. Proctor & L. Schiebinger (Eds.), Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance (pp. 37–54). California: Stanford University Press.
15. Grinnell, F. (1992). The scientific attitude (2nd ed.). London: The Guilford Press.
16. Hardwig, J. (1991). The role of trust in knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy,88(12), 693–708.
17. House of Lords. (2000). Science and technology—Third report. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ldselect/ldsctech/38/3801.htm. Accessed 1 Jan 2015.
18. Huss, R., Xiao, X., & Heimberg, H. (2008). Retraction: Adult stem cells regenerate the endocrine pancreas and normalize hyperglycaemia and insulin production in diabetic mice. Der Pathologe,29(2), 289.
19. Jasny, B. R., Chin, G., Chong, L., & Vignieri, S. (2011). Again, and again, and again …. Science,334, 1225.
20. Knoepfler, P. (2014, 3 July). Interview with Nature on their editorial process in wake of STAP. Knoepfler lab stem cell blog. http://www.ipscell.com/2014/07/interview-with-nature-on-their-editorial-process-in-wake-of-stap/. Accessed 1 Oct 2014.
21. Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science,7, 608–614.
22. Martin, A. (2014). Japanese university may strip stem-cell scientist of doctorate. The Wall Street Journal. http://online.wsj.com/articles/japanese-university-may-strip-stem-cell-scientist-of-doctorate-1412683955. Accessed 18 Oct 2014.
23. Martin, A. & Naik, G. (2014). Japanese institute weighs retracting stem-cell studies: Move by Riken comes a day after co-author called for retraction, citing ‘crucial mistakes’. The Wall Street Journal.http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304020104579430600241800532. Accessed 18 Oct 2014.
24. Nature Publishing Group. (2014a). For authors. Brief communications arising. http://www.nature.com/nature/authors/gta/commsarising.html. Accessed 4 Sept 2014.
25. Nature Publishing Group. (2014b). Availability of data & materials: Authors & referees. http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/availability.html. Accessed 18 Oct 2014.
26. Normile, D. (2014a, 12 Jun). Japanese stem cell debacle could bring down center. Science. http://news.sciencemag.org/asiapacific/2014/06/japanese-stem-cell-debacle-could-bring-down-center. Accessed 18 Oct 2014.
27. Normile, D. (2014b, 27 Aug). In Japan, official effort to replicate STAP stem cells comes up empty. Science. http://news.sciencemag.org/asiapacific/2014/08/japan-official-effort-replicate-stap-stem-cells-comes-empty. Accessed 1 Oct 2014.
28. Normile, D., & Vogel, G. (2014). 13 Jun. STAP cells succumb to pressure: Retraction plans for easy stem cell recipe leave scientists wondering how the papers came to be published. Science,344(6189), 1215–1216.
29. Obokata, H., Kojima, K., Westerman, K., Yamato, M., Okano, T., Tsuneda, S., & Vacanti, C. A. (2011). The potential of stem cells in adult tissues representative of the three germ layers. Tissue Engineering Part A,17(5–6), 607–615.
30. Obokata, H., Sasai, Y., Niwa, H., Kadota, M., Andrabi, M., Takata, N., et al. (2014a). Bidirectional developmental potential in reprogrammed cells with acquired pluripotency. Nature,505, 676–680.
31. Obokata, H., Wakayama, T., Sasai, Y., Kojima, K., Vacanti, M. P., Niwa, H., et al. (2014b). Stimulus-triggered fate conversion of somatic cells into pluripotency. Nature,505, 641–647.
32. Otake, T. (2014). Obokata says STAP cell discovery not fabrication, claims RIKEN dissuaded her from giving her side of the story earlier. The Japan Times. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/04/09/national/obokata-says-stap-cell-discovery-not-fabrication-claims-riken-dissuaded-her-from-giving-her-side-of-story-earlier/#.VELYVl5–lI. Accessed 18 Oct 2014.
33. Proctor, R. (2008). Agnotology: A missing term to describe the cultural production of ignorance (and its study). In R. N. Proctor & L. Schiebinger (Eds.), Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance (pp. 1–33). California: Stanford University Press.
34. Research Paper Investigative Committee. (2014). Report on STAP cell research paper investigation. http://www3.riken.jp/stap/e/f1document1.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2014.
35. ResearchGate. (2014, Apr 1). Researcher partly validates results of controversial stem cell study. ResearchGate. https://explore.researchgate.net/display/news/2014/04/01/Researcher+partly+validates+results+of+controversial+stem+cell+study. Accessed 1 Oct 2014.
36. Resnik, D. B. (1998). The ethics of science: An introduction. London: Routledge.
37. Retraction Watch. (2014, Sept 10). “Truly extraordinary,” “simply not credible,” “suspiciously sharp:” A STAP stem cell peer review report revealed. Retraction watchhttp://retractionwatch.com/2014/09/10/truly-extraordinary-simply-not-credible-suspiciously-sharp-a-stap-stem-cell-peer-review-report-revealed/. Accessed 12 Sept 2014.
38. Rice, C. (2013, Oct 4). Open access publishing hoax: What science magazine got wrong. The Guardian.http://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2013/oct/04/science-hoax-peer-review-open-access. Accessed 5 Oct 2013.
39. RIKEN. (2014). Interim report on the investigation of the Obokata et al. articles. http://www.riken.jp/en/pr/press/2014/20140314_1/. Accessed 18 Oct 2014.
40. Shapin, S. (2008). The scientific life: A moral history of a late modern vocation. London: University of Chicago Press.
41. Stevenson, L., & Byerly, H. (1995). The many faces of science: An introduction to scientists, values and society. Colorado: Westview Press.
42. Takahashi, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2006). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell,126(4), 663–676.
43. Tang, M. K., Lo, M. L. M., Shi, W. T., Lee, H. S. S., & Lee, K. K. H. (2014). Transient acid treatment cannot induce neonatal somatic cells to become pluripotent stem cells. F1000Research. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.4092.1. http://f1000research.com/articles/3-102/v1#sthash.7XanTt6W.dpuf. Accessed 4 Sept 2014.
44. The Japan Times. (2014a). Obokata injured while fleeing pack of NHK reporters, lawyer says. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/07/24/national/obokata-injured-fleeing-pack-nhk-reporters-lawyer-says/#.VELSsF5–lI. Accessed 18 Oct 2014.
45. The Japan Times. (2014b). STAP paper co-author Sasai commits suicide. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/08/05/national/embattled-stap-study-co-author-dies-after-apparent-suicide-bid/#.U_Srjtq9KSN. Accessed 18 Oct 2014.
46. Thomson, H. (2014, 5 Feb). Extraordinary stem cell method tested in human culture. New Scientist. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn25004-extraordinary-stem-cell-method-tested-in-human-tissue.html. Accessed 1 Oct 2014.
47. Vacanti, C. A., & Kojima, K. (2014). Revised STAP cell protocol. 09.03.14. https://research.bwhanesthesia.org/site_assets/51520d191eea6679ce000001/cterm/Revised_STAP_protocol-28bcd7e61d02a23624eb590717e241fe.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2014.
48. Vogel, G., & Normile, D. (2014). Exclusive: Nature reviewers not persuaded by initial STAP stem cell papers. Science.http://news.sciencemag.org/asiapacific/2014/09/exclusive-nature-reviewers-not-persuaded-initial-stap-stem-cell-papers. Accessed 12 Sept 2014.
49. Whyte, K. P., & Crease, R. (2010). Trust, expertise and the philosophy of science. Synthese,177(3), 411–425.
50. Zuckerman, H. (1984). Norms and deviant behaviour in science. Science, Technology and Human Values,9(1), 7–13.