Considerations for characterizing domain problems

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 10-November-2015, Issue , 2014, Pages 16-22

  Winters, Kirsten M ^a   Lach, Denise ^a   Cushing, Judith B ^b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EVERGREEN STATE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethnographic methods; Evaluation; Participant observation; Software development; Visualization

Indexed keywords

FLOW VISUALIZATION; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; VISUALIZATION;

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; DESIGN AND EVALUATIONS; DOMAIN PROBLEMS; ETHNOGRAPHIC METHODS; EVALUATION; PARTICIPANT OBSERVATIONS; RESEARCH STUDIES;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 84955459658     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2669557.2669573     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Batie, S. S. 2008. Sustainability science: Statement of the Friibergh Workshop on Sustainability Science. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(5): 1176-1191. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01202.
2. Beck, F., Burch, M., Diehl, S., & Weiskopf, D. 2014. The state of the art in visualizing dynamic graphs.
3. Cushing, J.B., N. Kopytko, N. Stevenson-Molnar, L. Zeman, S. Stafford, J. Bolte, B. Bond, D. Lach, & R. McKane. 2009. Enabling the dialog -scientist resource manager stakeholder: Visual analytis as boundary objects. IEEE Intelligent Systems 24(5).
4. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
5. Gross, A. G., & Harmon, J. E. 2013. Science from Sight to Insight: How Scientists Illustrate Meaning: University of Chicago Press.
6. Evans, E. 2004. Domain-driven Design: Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software: Addison-Wesley Professional.
7. Harmon, M.E., S.T. Brown, & S.T. Gower. 1991. From gaps to the globe: Ecosytem consequences of tree death. Ecological Society of America Bulletin 72.
8. Healey, C. G., & Enns, J. T. 2012. Attention and Visual Memory in Visualization and Computer Graphics, United States.
9. Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. NY: Farar, Strauss and Girous.
10. Kopytko, N., J. Cushing, L. Zeman, N. Stevenson-Molnar, F. Martin, & E. Keeley. 2009. Making ecology research results useful for resource management: A case study in visual analytics. Proc. of the 10th Annual Int. Conf. on Digital Government Research: Social Networks: Making Connections between Citizens, Data and Government. Eds. Stuart W. Shulman, Oscar Morales, Soon Ae Chun, Priscilla M. Regan and Rodrigo Sandoval. Vol. 390, 206-15.
11. Kratz, T.K., L.A. Deegan, M.E. Harmon, & W.K. Lauenroth. 2003. Ecological variability in space and time: Insights gained from US LTER Program. Bioscience 52 1: 57-67.
12. Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. 2013. Big data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
13. Peters, D.P.C., P.M. Nadelhoffer, N.B. Grimm, S.L. Collins, W.K. Michener, & M.A. Huston. 2008. Living in an increasingly connected world: A framework for continental-scale environmental science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment - Special Issue on Connectivity and Continental-Scale Research.
14. Pielke, R. A. 2007. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Hey, A. J. G., Tansley, S., Tolle, K. M., Tansley, S., Hey, A. J. G., & Tolle, K. M. 2009. The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Redmond, Wash: Microsoft Research.
16. Kang, Y., & Stasko, J. 2011. Characterizing the intelligence analysis process: Informing visual analytics design through a longitudinal field study. Paper presented at the Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), 2011 IEEE Conference.
17. Meyer, M., Sedlmair, M., & Munzner, T. 2012. The fourlevel nested model revisited: Blocks and guidelines. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2012 BELIV Workshop.
18. Munzner, T. 2009. A nested model for visualization design and validation. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 15(6), 921-928.
19. Munzner, T., Barsky, A., & Williams, M. 2011. Reflections on QuestVis: A visualization system for an environmental sustainability model. Dagstuhl Follow-Ups, 2.
20. National Academies of Science. 2001. Grand challenges in enviornmental science. URL: Www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record-id=9975. Last accessed 6/2014.
21. Rittel, H. & Weber, M. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155-169.
22. Robertson, G., Ebert, D., Eick, S., Keim, D., & Joy, K. 2009. Scale and complexity in visual analytics. Information Visualization, 8(4). doi: 10.1057/ivs.2009.23.
23. Sedlmair, M., Meyer, M., & Munzner, T. 2012. Design study methodology: Reflections from the trenches and the stacks. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 18(12), 2431-2440.
24. Silverman, D. 2006. Interpreting Qualitative Data, 3rd Edition. SAGE publications.
25. Smallman, H. S., & John, M. S. 2005. Naïve realism: Misplaced faith in realistic displays. Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications, 13(3), 6-13.
26. Sprague, D., & Tory, M. 2012. Exploring how and why people use visualizations in casual contexts: Modeling user goals and regulated motivations. Information Visualization, 11(2), 106-123.
27. Sturken, M., & L. Cartwright. 2009. Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Thomas, J., & Cook, K. e. 2005. Illuminating the path: The research and development agenda for visual analytics. IEEE.