Sentiment of emojis

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 12, 2015, Pages

  Novak, Petra Kralj ^a   Smailović, Jasmina ^a   Sluban, Borut ^a   Mozetič, Igor ^a  

^a JO EF STEFAN INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HANDWRITING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; MASS MEDIUM; SOCIAL MEDIA; EMOTION; EUROPE; INTERNET; NOMENCLATURE;

EMOTIONS; EUROPE; HUMANS; INTERNET; SOCIAL MEDIA; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 84955449861     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144296     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Dimson T. Emojineering part 1: Machine learning for emoji trends [blog]; 2015. http://instagramengineering.Tumblr.com/post/117889701472/emojineering-part-1-machine-learning-for-emoji/.
2. SwiftKey PT. Most-used emoji revealed: Americans love skulls, Brazilians love cats, the French love hearts [blog]; 2015. http://swiftkey.com/en/blog/americans-love-skulls-brazilians-love-cats-swiftkeyemoji-meanings-report/.
3. Liu B. Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. 2012; 5(1):1-167. doi: 10.2200/S00416ED1V01Y201204HLT016
4. Liu B. Sentiment Analysis: Mining Opinions, Sentiments, and Emotions. Cambridge University Press; 2015.
5. Boia M, Faltings B, Musat CC, Pu P. A:) is worth a thousand words: How people attach sentiment to emoticons and words in tweets. In: Intl. Conf. on Social Computing (SocialCom). IEEE; 2013. p. 345-350.
6. Hogenboom A, Bal D, Frasincar F, Bal M, de Jong F, Kaymak U. Exploiting emoticons in polarity classification of text. Journal of Web Engeneering. 2015; 14(1-2):22-40.
7. Hogenboom A, Bal D, Frasincar F, Bal M, de Jong F, Kaymak U. Exploiting emoticons in sentiment analysis. In: Proc. 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. ACM; 2013. p. 703-710.
8. Davidov D, Tsur O, Rappoport A. Enhanced sentiment learning using Twitter hashtags and smileys. In: Proc. 23rd Intl. Conf. on Computational Linguistics: Posters. ACL; 2010. p. 241-249.
9. Liu KL, Li WJ, Guo M. Emoticon smoothed language models for Twitter sentiment analysis. In: Proc. 26th AAAI Conf. on Artificial Intelligence; 2012. p. 1678-1684.
10. Read J. Using emoticons to reduce dependency in machine learning techniques for sentiment classification. In: Proc. ACL Student Research Workshop. ACL; 2005. p. 43-48.
11. Zhao J, Dong L, Wu J, Xu K. Moodlens: An emoticon-based sentiment analysis system for Chinese tweets. In: Proc. 18th ACM SIGKDD Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM; 2012. p. 1528-1531.
12. Kiritchenko S, Zhu X, Mohammad SM. Sentiment analysis of short informal texts. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 2014;p. 723-762.
13. The Unicode Consortium, Allen JD, et al. The Unicode Standard, Version 6.0. Mountain View, CA; 2011. Available from: http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.0.0/.
14. The Unicode Consortium, Allen JD, et al. The Unicode Standard, Version 7.0. Mountain View, CA; 2014. Available from: http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode7.0.0/.
15. The Unicode Consortium, Allen JD, et al. The Unicode Standard, Version 8.0. Mountain View, CA; 2015. Available from: http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode8.0.0/.
16. Baccianella S, Esuli A, Sebastiani F. SentiWordNet 3.0: An enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: LREC. vol. 10; 2010. p. 2200-2204.
17. Miller GA. WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM. 1995; 38(11):39-41. doi: 10.1145/219717.219748
18. Go A, Bhayani R, Huang L. Twitter sentiment classification using distant supervision. CS224N Project Report, Stanford. 2009;1:12.
19. Pak A, Paroubek P. Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: LREC. vol. 10; 2010. p. 1320-1326.
20. Thelwall M, Buckley K, Paltoglou G, Cai D, Kappas A. Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2010; 61(12):2544-2558. doi: 10.1002/asi.21416
21. Amalanathan A, Anouncia SM. Social network user's content personalization based on emoticons. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015; 8(23).
22. Ganesan KA, Sundaresan N, Deo H. Mining tag clouds and emoticons behind community feedback. In: Proc. 17th Intl. Conf. on World Wide Web. ACM; 2008. p. 1181-1182.
23. Kramer AD. The spread of emotion via Facebook. In: Proc. SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM; 2012. p. 767-770.
24. Kramer AD, Guillory JE, Hancock JT. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc. National Academy of Sciences. 2014; 111(24):8788-8790. doi: 10. 1073/pnas.1320040111
25. Coviello L, Sohn Y, Kramer AD, Marlow C, Franceschetti M, Christakis NA, et al. Detecting emotional contagion in massive social networks. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(3):e90315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0090315
26. Zollo F, Novak Kralj P, Del Vicario M, Bessi A, Mozetič I, Scala A, et al. Emotional dynamics in the age of misinformation. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(9):e138740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138740
27. Gruzd A, Doiron S, Mai P. Is happiness contagious online? A case of Twitter and the 2010 Winter Olympics. In: Proc. 44th Hawaii Intl. Conf. on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE; 2011. p. 1-9.
28. Hatfield E, Cacioppo JT, Rapson RL. Emotional Contagion. Cambridge University Press; 1994.
29. Pearson K. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 1895; 58:240-242. doi: 10.1098/rspl.1895.0041
30. Spearman C. The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American Journal of Psychology. 1904; 15:72-101. doi: 10.2307/1412159
31. Welch BL. The generalization of "Student's" problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika. 1947; 34(1-2):28-35. doi: 10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28
32. Fagerland MW.T-Tests, non-parametric tests, and large studies-A paradox of statistical practice? BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2012; 12(78). doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-78
33. Krippendorff K. Content Analysis, An Introduction to Its Methodology. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2012.
34. Newman MEJ. Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law. Contemporary Physics. 2005; 46 (5):323-351. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0412004. doi: 10.1080/00107510500052444
35. Smailović J, Kranjc J, Grčar M, Žnidaršič M, Mozetič I. Monitoring the Twitter sentiment during the Bulgarian elections. In: Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA). IEEE; 2015.
36. Sluban B, Smailović J, Battiston S, Mozetič I. Sentiment leaning of influential communities in social networks. Computational Social Networks. 2015; 2(9). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40649-015-0016-5.
37. Ranco G, Aleksovski A, Caldarelli G, Grčar M, Mozetič I. The effects of Twitter sentiment on stock price returns. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(9):e138441. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138441
38. Smailović J, Grčar M, Lavrač N, Žnidaršič M. Stream-based active learning for sentiment analysis in the financial domain. Information Sciences. 2014; 285:181-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.04.034
39. Zhang W, Skiena S. Trading strategies to exploit blog and news sentiment. In: Proc. 4th Intl. AAAI Conf. on Weblogs and Social Media; 2010. p. 375-378.
40. Good IJ. The Estimation of Probabilities: An Essay on Modern Bayesian Methods. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1965.