Utilization of Clinical Trials Registries in Obstetrics and Gynecology Systematic Reviews

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 127, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 248-253

  Bibens, Michael E ^a   Chong, A Benjamin ^a   Vassar, Matt ^a  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; GYNECOLOGY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; OBSTETRICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTER; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; GYNECOLOGY; OBSTETRICS; REGISTRIES;

EID: 84955440856     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001204     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Mackeen AD, Schuster M, Berghella V. Suture versus staples for kin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212:621.e1-10.
2. Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA 1990;263:1385-9.
3. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-Analysis. West Sussex (UK): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2009.
4. De Angelis C, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, Haug C, Hoey J, Horton R, et al. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1250-1.
5. Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007. US Public Law 110-85; 21 USC 301, September 27, 2007.
6. World Health Organization. WHO statement on Public disclosure of clinical trial results. Available at: http://www.who. int/ictrp/results/reporting/en/. Retrieved August 6, 2015.
7. Sinnett PM, Carr B, Cook G, Mucklerath H, Varney L, Weiher M, et al. Systematic reviewers in clinical neurology do not routinely search clinical trials registries. PLoS One 2015;10:e0134596.
8. Keil LG, Platts-Mills TF, Jones CW. Systematic reviews published in emergency medicine journals do not routinely search clinical trials registries: a cross-sectional analysis. Ann Emerg Med 2015;66:424-427.e2.
9. Jones CW, Keil LG, Weaver MA, Platts-Mills TF. Clinical trials registries are under-utilized in the conduct of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis. Syst Rev 2014;3:126.
10. Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, Haynes RB; Hedges Team. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from MEDLINE: analytical survey. BMJ 2005;330: 68.
11. Onishi A, Furukawa TA. Publication bias is underreported in systematic reviews published in high-impact-factor journals: metaepidemiologic study. J Clin Epidemiol 2014;67:1320-6.
12. World Health Organization. International clinical trials registry platform-WHO registry criteria. Available at: http://www.who.int/ictrp/network/criteria-summary/en/. Retrieved July 24, 2015.
13. Souza JP, Pileggi C, Cecatti JG. Assessment of funnel plot asymmetry and publication bias in reproductive health metaanalyses: an analytic survey. Reprod Health 2007;4:3.
14. Hopkins L, Smaill F. Antibiotic prophylaxis regimens and drugs for cesarean section. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD001136. DOI: 10. 1002/14651858.CD001136.pub2.
15. Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD003766. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub5.