Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities following computed tomography (CT) scanning for assessing the resectability with curative intent in pancreatic and periampullary cancer

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2015, Issue 2, 2015, Pages

  Gurusamy, Kurinchi Selvan ^a   Davidson, Brian R ^a  

^a ROYAL FREE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM CANCER; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROTOMY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS CANCER; PERIAMPULLARY CANCER; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 84955360288     PISSN: 14651858     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011515     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abrams RA, Lowy AM, O'Reilly EM, Wolff RA, Picozzi VJ, Pisters PW. Combined modality treatment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreas cancer: expert consensus statement. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2009;16(7):1751-6.
2. Allen VB, Gurusamy KS, Takwoingi Y, Kalia A, Davidson BR. Diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopy following computed tomography (CT) scanning for assessing the resectability with curative intent in pancreatic and periampullary cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 11. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009323.pub2]
3. Pancreatric Section British Society of Gastroenterology, Pancreatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, Royal College of Pathologists, Special Interest Group for Gastro-Intestinal Radiology. Guidelines for the management of patients with pancreatic cancer periampullary and ampullary carcinomas. Gut 2005;54(Suppl 5):v1-16.
4. Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Kaufman HS, Coleman J. One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Annals of Surgery 1993;217(5):430-5.
5. Chu H, Cole SR. Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2006;59(12):1331-2.
6. Conlon KC, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF. Long-term survival after curative resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clinicopathologic analysis of 5-year survivors. Annals of Surgery 1996;223(3):273-9.
7. Eloubeidi MA, Wade SB, Provenzale D. Factors associated with acceptance and full publication of GI endoscopic research originally published in abstract form. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2001;53(3):275-82.
8. Engelken FJ, Bettschart V, Rahman MQ, Parks RW, Garden OJ. Prognostic factors in the palliation of pancreatic cancer. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2003;29(4):368-73.
9. Hariharan D, Constantinides VA, Froeling FE, Tekkis PP, Kocher HM. The role of laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound in the preoperative staging of pancreatico-biliary cancers--A meta-analysis. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2010;36(10):941-8.
10. International Agency for Research on Cancer. GLOBOCAN 2012. http://globocan.iarc.fr/Default.aspx (accessed on 19 January 2014).
11. Klempnauer J, Ridder GJ, Pichlmayr R. Prognostic factors after resection of ampullary carcinoma: multivariate survival analysis in comparison with ductal cancer of the pancreatic head. British Journal of Surgery 1995;82(12):1686-91.
12. Liao WC, Chien KL, Lin YL, Wu MS, Lin JT, Wang HP, et al.Adjuvant treatments for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Oncology 2013;14(11):1095-103.
13. Livingston EH, Welton ML, Reber HA. Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer. The United States experience. International Journal of Pancreatology 1991;9:153-7.
14. Michelassi F, Erroi F, Dawson PJ, Pietrabissa A, Noda S, Handcock M, et al.Experience with 647 consecutive tumors of the duodenum, ampulla, head of the pancreas, and distal common bile duct. Annals of Surgery 1989;210(4):544-54.
15. National Cancer Institute (U.S. National Institute of Health). Dictionary of Cancer terms. Periampullary cancer. http://www.cancer.gov/dictionary/?CdrID=543930 (accessed 22 July 2014).
16. National Cancer Institute (U.S. National Institute of Health). Dictionary of Cancer terms. CT scan. http://www.cancer.gov/dictionary?CdrID=46033 (accessed 22 July 2014).
17. National Cancer Institute (U.S. National Institute of Health). Dictionary of Cancer terms. Magnetic resonance imaging. http://www.cancer.gov/dictionary?CdrID=45997 (accessed 22 July 2014).
18. National Cancer Institute (U.S. National Institute of Health). Dictionary of Cancer terms. Positron emission tomography scan. http://www.cancer.gov/dictionary?CdrID=46218 (accessed 22 July 2014).
19. National Cancer Institute (U.S. National Institute of Health). Dictionary of Cancer terms. PET-CT scan. http://www.cancer.gov/dictionary?CdrID=742485 (accessed 22 July 2014).
20. National Cancer Institute (U.S. National Institute of Health). Dictionary of Cancer terms. Endoscopic ultrasound. http://www.cancer.gov/dictionary?CdrID=46602 (accessed 22 July 2014).
21. Niederhuber JE, Brennan MF, Menck HR. The National Cancer Data Base report on pancreatic cancer. Cancer 1995;76(9):1671-7.
22. Nitecki SS, Sarr MG, Colby TV, van Heerden JA. Long-term survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Is it really improving?. Annals of Surgery 1995;221(1):59-66.
23. Orr RK. Outcomes in pancreatic cancer surgery. Surgical Clinics of North America 2010;90(2):219-34.
24. Parkin DM, Bray FI, Devesa SS. Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture. European Journal of Cancer 2001;37(Suppl 8):S4-66.
25. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2005;55(2):74-108.
26. Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2005;58(10):982-90.
27. Sampson M, Shojania KG, McGowan J, Daniel R, Rader T, Iansavichene AE, et al.Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008;61(8):755-62.
28. Shahrudin MD. Carcinoma of the pancreas: resection outcome at the University Hospital Kuala Lumpur. International Surgery 1997;82(3):269-74.
29. Smith RA, Bosonnet L, Ghaneh P, Sutton R, Evans J, Healey P, et al.The platelet-lymphocyte ratio improves the predictive value of serum CA19-9 levels in determining patient selection for staging laparoscopy in suspected periampullary cancer. Surgery 2008;143(5):658-66.
30. Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger HD. Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality. Annals of Surgery 1990;211(4):447-58.
31. Whiting PF, Weswood ME, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PN, Kleijnen J. Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2006; Vol. 6:9.
32. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al.QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Annals of Internal Medicine 2011;155(8):529-36.
33. Yamamoto M, Ohashi O, Saitoh Y. Japan Pancreatic Cancer Registry: current status. Pancreas 1998;16(3):238-42.