Ocular surface disease index (OSDI) versus the standard patient evaluation of eye dryness (SPEED): A study of a nonclinical sample

Cornea

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 175-180

  Asiedu, Kofi ^a,b   Kyei, Samuel ^a   Mensah, Sekyere N ^a   Ocansey, Stephen ^a,c   Abu, Listowell S ^a   Kyere, Elvis A ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE COAST   (Ghana)

^b KOMFO ANOKYE TEACHING HOSPITAL   (Ghana)

^c ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d KORLE BU TEACHING HOSPITAL   (Ghana)

Author keywords

Dry eye; Psychometric properties; Questionnaires; Symptoms; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRY EYE; EYE BURNING; EYE DISEASE; EYE DISEASE ASSESSMENT; EYE FATIGUE; EYE IRRITATION; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; LACRIMAL FLUID; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OCULAR SURFACE DISEASE INDEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARD PATIENT EVALUATION OF EYE DRYNESS; VALIDATION STUDY; ADOLESCENT; ANAMNESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORNEA; DRY EYE SYNDROMES; FEMALE; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MALE; MEIBOMIAN GLAND; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CORNEA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DRY EYE SYNDROMES; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY TAKING; MEIBOMIAN GLANDS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84955356827     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: 15364798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000712     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. The epidemiology of dry eye disease: report of the Epidemiology Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocul Surf. 2007;5:93-107.
2. McMonnies CW. Key questions in a dry eye history. J Am Optom Assoc. 1986;57:512-517.
3. McMonnies CW, Ho A. Patient history in screening for dry eye conditions. J Am Optom Assoc. 1987;58:296-301.
4. Begley CG, Chalmers RL, Mitchell GL, et al. Characterization of ocular surface symptoms from optometric practices in North America. Cornea. 2001;20:610-618.
5. Tan LL, Morgan P, Cai ZQ, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for symptomatic dry eye disease in Singapore. Clin Exp Optom. 2015;98: 45-53.
6. McGinnigle S, Naroo SA, Eperjesi F. Evaluation of dry eye. Surv Ophthalmol. 2012;57:293-316.
7. Nichols KK, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. The repeatability of clinical measurements of dry eye. Cornea. 2004;23:272-285.
8. Caffery B, Chalmers RL, Marsden H, et al. Correlation of tear osmolarity and dry eye symptoms in convention attendees. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91: 142-149.
9. Korb DR. Survey of preferred test for diagnosis of tear film and dry eye. Cornea. 2000;19:483-486.
10. Nichols KK, Nichols JJ, Zadnik GL. Frequency of dry eye diagnostic test procedures used in various modes of ophthalmic practice. Cornea. 2000; 19:477-482.
11. Gothwal VK, Pesudovs K, Wright TA, et al. McMonnies questionnaire: enhancing screening for dry eye syndromes with Rasch analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:1401-1407.
12. Ngo W, Situ P, Keir N, et al. Psychometric properties and validation of the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness questionnaire. Cornea. 2013;32:1204-1210.
13. Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, et al. Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118: 615-621.
14. Adcock R, Collier D. Measurement validity: a shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2001;95:529-546.
15. Simpson TL, Situ P, Jones LW, et al. Dry eye symptoms assessed by four questionnaires. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:692-699.
16. Kline P. An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis. New York, NY: Routledge; 1997.
17. Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2005;10:1-9.
18. Field A. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE publications, Inc; 2009.
19. Cortina JM. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78:98-104.
20. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiving operating (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143:29-36.
21. McNeil BJ, Hanley JA. Statistical approaches to the analysis of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Med Decis Making. 1984;4: 137-150.
22. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.