Doing military research in conflict environments

Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Military Studies

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 40-52

  Müller Wille, Björn ^a  

^a UK Royal Military Academy   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955346541     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Church, C. and M.M. Rogers (2006). Designing for Results: Integrating Monitoring and Evaluation in Conflict Transformation Programs. Washington: SFCG. Available at: http://www.sfcg.org/programmes/ilt/ilt_ manualpage.html.
2. De Coning, C. and P. Romita (2009). Monitoring and Evaluation of Peace Operations. New York: International Peace Institute.
3. DFID (2012). Broadening the range of designs and methods for impact evaluation. Working Paper 38. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/67427/designmethod- impact-eval.pdf
4. Farrell, T. and A. Giustozzi (2013). 'The Taliban at war: Inside the Helmand insurgency, 2004-2012'. International Affairs, 89(4): 845-871.
5. Giustozzi, A. (ed.) (2009). Decoding the New Taliban: Insights from the Afghan Field. New York: Columbia University Press.
6. Glenn, R.W. and S.J. Gayton (2008). Intelligence Operations and Metrics in Iraq and Afghanistan. Washington, DC: National Defense Research Institute.
7. Jans, N. (2014). 'Getting on the same net: How the theory-driven academic can better communicate with the pragmatic military client'. In: J.M.M.L. Soeters, P.M. Shields, and S.J.H. Rietjens (eds) Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Military Studies. Abingdon: Routledge.
8. The Liaison Office (TLO) (2009). Three Years Later: A Socio-Political Assessment of Uruzgan Province from 2006-2009. Kabul: TLO.
9. The Liaison Office (TLO) (2010). The Dutch Engagement in Uruzgan: 2006-2010, A TLO Socio-Political Assessment. Kabul: TLO.
10. Mansfield, D. (2013). All bets are off! Prospects for (b)reaching agreements and drug control in Helmand and Nangarhar in the run up to transition: Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit Case Study Series. Available at: www.areu.org.af/UpdateDownloadHits.aspx?EditionId=621&Pdf=1302%20Opium% 2023%20Jan-Final.pdf.
11. Mitchell, P.T. (2009). Network Centric Warfare and Coalition Operations: The New Military Operating System. London: Routledge.
12. OECD (2012). Evaluating Peacebuilding Activities in Settings of Conflict and Fragility: Improving Learning for Results. DAC Guidelines and References Series, OECD Publishing. Available at: http://dx.doi. org/10.1787/9789264106802-en.
13. Rietjens, S.J.H., J.M.M.L. Soeters and W. Klumper (2011). 'Measuring the immeasurable?: The effectsbased approach in comprehensive peace operations'. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(5): 329-338.
14. Rietjens, S.J.H. (2011). 'Between expectations and reality: The Dutch engagement in Uruzgan'. In: Hynek, N. and P. Marton (eds) Statebuilding in Afghanistan: Multinational Contributions to Reconstruction. London: Routledge, pp. 65-87.
15. Sriram, C.L., J.C. King, J.A. Mertus, O. Martin-Ortega and J. Herman (eds) (2009). Surviving Field Research: Working in Violent and Difficult Situations. Abingdon: Routledge.
16. Stabilisation Unit and Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre (DCDC) (2012). Joint Doctrine Note 2/12, Assessment. Shrivenham: UK Ministry of Defence.
17. UNDP (2009). Handbook on planning, monitoring and evaluating for development results. Available at: http://web.undp.org/evaluation/handbook/documents/english/pme-handbook.pdf.
18. Van Bijlert, M. (2009). 'Unruly commanders and violent power struggles: Taliban networks in Uruzgan.' In: Giustozzi, A. (ed.) Decoding the New Taliban: Insights from the Afghan Field. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 155-178.
19. Van Dijk, A., J.M.M.L. Soeters and R. de Ridder (2010). 'Smooth translation? A research note on the cooperation between Dutch service personnel and local interpreters in Afghanistan'. Armed Forces & Society, 36(5): 917-925.