Enhanced random forest for mitosis detection

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 14, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Paul, Angshuman ^a   Mukherjee, Dipti Prasad ^a  

^a INDIAN STATISTICAL INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Breast cancer grading; Forest Penalty; Random forest; Tree penalty; Weighted voting

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER VISION; DECISION TREES; DISEASES; FORESTRY; GRADING; IMAGE PROCESSING; POPULATION STATISTICS;

BREAST CANCER GRADING; FOREST PENALTY; RANDOM FORESTS; TREE PENALTY; WEIGHTED VOTING;

REFORESTATION;

EID: 84955307214     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2683483.2683569     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. http://www.biology.arizona.edu. Available as on 20.07.2014.
2. http://mitos-atypia-14.grand-challenge.org/dataset/. Available as on 20.07.2014.
3. http://amida13.isi.uu.nl/?q=node/62. Available as on 20.07.2014.
4. S. T. Acton and D. P. Mukherjee. Scale space classification using area morphology. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 9(4):623-635, 2000.
5. Y. Al-Kofahi et al. Improved automatic detection and segmentation of cell nuclei in histopathology images. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 57(4):841-852, 2010.
6. P. Barlow. Changes in chromatin structure during the mitotic cycle. Protoplasma, 91(2):207-211, 1977.
7. L. Breiman. Random forests. Machine learning, 45(1):5-32, 2001.
8. A. S. Chowdhury, A. Paul, F. Bunyak, D. Cornelison, and K. Palaniappan. Semi-automated tracking of muscle satellite cells in brightfield microscopy video. In Image Processing (ICIP), 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on, pages 2825-2828. IEEE, 2012.
9. D. C. Cireşan et al. Mitosis detection in breast cancer histology images with deep neural networks. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2013, pages 411-418. Springer, 2013.
10. J.-R. Dalle et al. Automatic breast cancer grading of histopathological images. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2008. EMBS 2008. 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, pages 3052-3055. IEEE, 2008.
11. O. Dzyubachyk et al. Advanced level-set based multiple-cell segmentation and tracking in time-lapse uorescence microscopy images. In Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2008. ISBI 2008. 5th IEEE Int. Symposium on, pages 185-188. IEEE, 2008.
12. H. F. Frierson Jr et al. Interobserver reproducibility of the nottingham modification of the bloom and richardson histologic grading scheme for infiltrating ductal carcinoma. American journal of clinical pathology, 103(2):195-198, 1995.
13. C. Genestie et al. Comparison of the prognostic value of scarff-bloom-richardson and nottingham histological grades in a series of 825 cases of breast cancer: major importance of the mitotic count as a component of both grading systems. Anticancer research, 18(1B):571-576, 1997.
14. M. Held et al. Cellcognition: time-resolved phenotype annotation in high-throughput live cell imaging. Nature methods, 7(9):747-754, 2010.
15. H. Irshad. Automated mitosis detection in histopathology using morphological and multi-channel statistics features. J. of pathology informatics, 4, 2013.
16. H. Irshad et al. Automated mitosis detection using texture, sift features and hmax biologically inspired approach. J. of pathology informatics, 4(Suppl), 2013.
17. J. Kapur, P. K. Sahoo, and A. K. Wong. A new method for gray-level picture thresholding using the entropy of the histogram. Computer vision, graphics, and image processing, 29(3):273-285, 1985.
18. G. Lin et al. A multi-model approach to simultaneous segmentation and classification of heterogeneous populations of cell nuclei in 3d confocal microscope images. Cytometry Part A, 71(9):724-736, 2007.
19. D. P. Mukherjee et al. Level set analysis for leukocyte detection and tracking. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 13(4):562-572, 2004.
20. A. Nedzved et al. Morphological segmentation of histology cell images. In Pattern Recognition, 2000. Proceedings. 15th International Conference on, volume 1, pages 500-503. IEEE, 2000.
21. N. R. Pal. On minimum cross-entropy thresholding. Pattern Recognition, 29(4):575-580, 1996.
22. M. Polak, H. Zhang, and M. Pi. An evaluation metric for image segmentation of multiple objects. Image and Vision Computing, 27(8):1223-1227, 2009.
23. V. Roullier et al. Multi-resolution graph-based analysis of histopathological whole slide images: Application to mitotic cell extraction and visualization. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 35(7):603-615, 2011.
24. C. Sommer et al. ilastik: Interactive learning and segmentation toolkit. In Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on, pages 230-233. IEEE, 2011.
25. C. Sommer et al. Learning-based mitotic cell detection in histopathological images. In Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 2012 21st International Conference on, pages 2306-2309. IEEE, 2012.
26. F. B. Tek. Mitosis detection using generic features and an ensemble of cascade adaboosts. Journal of pathology informatics, 4, 2013.
27. M. Veta et al. Breast cancer histopathology image analysis: a review. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 61(5):1400-1411, 2014.
28. X. Yang et al. Nuclei segmentation using marker-controlled watershed, tracking using mean-shift, and kalman filter in time-lapse microscopy. Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, IEEE Transactions on, 53(11):2405-2414, 2006.