Integrative modelling reveals mechanisms linking productivity and plant species richness

Nature

Volumn 529, Issue 7586, 2016, Pages 390-393

  Grace, James B ^a   Anderson, T Michael ^b   Seabloom, Eric W ^c   Borer, Elizabeth T ^c   Adler, Peter B ^d   Harpole, W Stanley ^e,f,g   Hautier, Yann ^h   Hillebrand, Helmut ⁱ   Lind, Eric M ^c   Pärtel, Meelis ^j   Bakker, Jonathan D ^k   Buckley, Yvonne M ^l   Crawley, Michael J ^m   Damschen, Ellen I ⁿ   Davies, Kendi F ^o   Fay, Philip A ^p   Firn, Jennifer ^q   Gruner, Daniel S ^r   Hector, Andy ^s   Knops, Johannes M H ^t   MacDougall, Andrew S ^u   Melbourne, Brett A ^o   Morgan, John W ^v   Orrock, John L ⁿ   Prober, Suzanne M ^w   Smith, Melinda D ^x   more..

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^d UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^f GERMAN CENTRE FOR INTEGRATIVE BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH IDIV HALLE JENA LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^g MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^h UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^j UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

^k UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^l TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^m IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^o UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^p Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service ^*  (United States)

^q QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^r UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^s UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^t UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA   (United States)

^u UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^v LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^w CSIRO   (Australia)

^x Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ECOLOGICAL THEORY; GRASSLAND; HISTORICAL ECOLOGY; MACROECOLOGY; PLANT; PRIMARY PRODUCTION; SPECIES RICHNESS;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; BIOMASS; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; CLIMATE; ECOSYSTEM; ECOSYSTEM PRODUCTIVITY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; NONHUMAN; PLANT; PLANT SPECIES RICHNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOIL FERTILITY; SPECIES RICHNESS; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; GEOGRAPHY; GRASSLAND; METABOLISM;

BIODIVERSITY; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; GEOGRAPHY; GRASSLAND; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANTS;

EID: 84955300273     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature16524     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Willig, M. R. Biodiversity and productivity. Science 333, 1709-1710 (2011).
2. Adler, P. B. et al. Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness. Science 333, 1750-1753 (2011).
3. Fraser, L. H. et al. Plant ecology. Worldwide evidence of a unimodal relationship between productivity and plant species richness. Science 349, 302-305 (2015).
4. Grime, J. P. Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 242, 344-347 (1973).
5. Huston, M. A. A general hypothesis of species diversity. Am. Nat. 113, 81-101 (1979).
6. Tilman, D. Resource Competition and Community Structure (Princeton Univ. Press, 1982).
7. Taylor, D. R., Aarssen, L. W., Loehle, C. On the relationship between r/K selection and environmental carrying capacity: a new habitat templet for plant life history strategies. Oikos 58, 239-250 (1990).
8. Gillman, L. N., Wright, S. D. The influence of productivity on the species richness of plants: a critical assessment. Ecology 87, 1234-1243 (2006).
9. Naeem, S., Thompson, L. J., Lawler, S. P., Lawton, J. H., Woodfin, R. M. Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems. Nature 368, 734-737 (1994).
10. Tilman, D., Wedin, D., Knops, J. Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature 379, 718-720 (1996).
11. Huston, M. A. Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110, 449-460 (1997).
12. Grime, J. P. Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the debate deepens. Science 277, 1260-1261 (1997).
13. Cardinale, B. J. et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486, 59-67 (2012).
14. Tilman, D., Reich, P. B., Isbell, F. Biodiversity impacts ecosystem productivity as much as resources, disturbance, or herbivory. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 10394-10397 (2012).
15. Hawkins, B. A. et al. Energy, water, and broad-scale geographic patterns of species richness. Ecology 84, 3105-3117 (2003).
16. Pärtel, M., Zobel, K., Laanisto, L., Szava-Kovats, R., Zobel, M. The productivitydiversity relationship: varying aims and approaches. Ecology 91, 2565-2567 (2010).
17. Grime, J. P. Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes (John Wiley, 1979).
18. Chase, J. M., Leibold, M. A. Spatial scale dictates the productivity-biodiversity relationship. Nature 416, 427-430 (2002).
19. Scheiner, S. M., Jones, S. Diversity, productivity and scale in Wisconsin vegetation. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4, 1097-1117 (2002).
20. Waide, R. et al. The relationship between productivity and species richness. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30, 257-300 (1999).
21. Grace, J. B. The factors controlling species density in herbaceous plant communities: an assessment. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2, 1-28 (1999).
22. Mittelbach, G. G. et al. What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity Ecology 82, 2381-2396 (2001).
23. Whittaker, R. J. Meta-analyses and mega-mistakes: calling time on meta-analysis of the species richness-productivity relationship. Ecology 91, 2522-2533 (2010).
24. Borer, E. T. et al. Herbivores and nutrients control grassland plant diversity via light limitation. Nature 508, 517-520 (2014).
25. Schmid, B. The species richness-productivity controversy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 113-114 (2002).
26. Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Inchausti, P. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives (Oxford Univ. Press, 2002).
27. Cardinale, B. J., Bennett, D. M., Nelson, C. E., Gross, K. Does productivity drive diversity or vice versa A test of the multivariate productivity-diversity hypothesis in streams. Ecology 90, 1227-1241 (2009).
28. Scherber, C. et al. Bottom-up effects of plant diversity on multitrophic interactions in a biodiversity experiment. Nature 468, 553-556 (2010).
29. Grace, J. B. et al. Guidelines for a graph-theoretic implementation of structural equation modeling. Ecosphere 3, art73 (2012).
30. Grace, J. B., Adler, P. B., Stanley Harpole, W., Borer, E. T., Seabloom, E. W. Causal networks clarify productivity-richness interrelations, bivariate plots do not. Funct. Ecol. 28, 787-798 (2014).
31. Grace, J. B., Anderson, T. M., Olff, H., Scheiner, S. M. On the specification of structural equation models for ecological systems. Ecol. Monogr. 80, 67-87 (2010).
32. Regan, H. M., Colyvan, M., Burgman, M. A. A taxonomy and treatment of uncertainty for ecology and conservation biology. Ecol. Appl. 12, 618-628 (2002).
33. Borer, E. T. et al. Finding generality in ecology: a model for globally distributed experiments. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 65-73 (2014).
34. Gelman, A., Hill, J. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
35. Chao, A. Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 43, 783-791 (1987).
36. Chao, A., Jost, L. Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology 93, 2533-2547 (2012).
37. Lauenroth, W., Hunt, H., Swift, D., Singh, J. Estimating aboveground net primary production in grasslands: a simulation approach. Ecol. Modell. 33, 297-314 (1986).
38. Oesterheld, M., McNaughton, S. J. in Methods in Ecosystem Science (eds Sala, O. E., Jackson, R. B., Mooney, H. A., Howarth, R. W.) Ch. 10, 151-157 (Springer, 2000).
39. Muldavin, E. H., Moore, D. I., Collins, S. L., Wetherill, K. R., Lightfoot, D. C. Aboveground net primary production dynamics in a northern Chihuahuan Desert ecosystem. Oecologia 155, 123-132 (2008).
40. Hijmans, R., Cameron, S., Parra, J., Jones, P., Jarvis, A. WorldClim, version 1.3 (Univ. California, Berkeley, 2005).
41. Grace, J. B., Bollen, K. A. Representing general theoretical concepts in structural equation models: the role of composite variables. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 15, 191-213 (2008).
42. Grace, J. B., Scheiner, S. M., Schoolmaster, D. R. Jr in Ecological Statistics (eds Fox, G. A., Negrete-Yankelevich, S., Sosa, V. J.) Ch. 8, 168-199 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2015).
43. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2012).
44. Rosseel, Y., Oberski, D., Byrnes, J., Vanbrabant, L., Savalei, V. lavaan: latent variable analysis (software) (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013).
45. Oberski, D. lavaan. Survey: an R package for complex survey analysis of structural equation models. J. Stat. Softw. 57, 1-27 (2014).