The prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Systematic Reviews

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Haghbayan, Hourmazd ^a   Boutin, Amélie ^a   Laflamme, Mathieu ^a   Lauzier, François ^a,b   Shemilt, Michèle ^a   Moore, Lynne ^a,b   Zarychanski, Ryan ^c,d   Fergusson, Dean ^e   Turgeon, Alexis F ^a,b  

^a LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^d CANCERCARE MANITOBA   (Canada)

^e OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Imaging; MRI; Outcomes; Prognosis; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISEASE SEVERITY; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MORTALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN; BRAIN INJURY; META ANALYSIS; PATHOLOGY;

BRAIN; BRAIN INJURIES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

EID: 84955275310     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20464053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0184-x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Coronado VG. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits, hospitalizations and deaths 2002-2006. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2010.
2. Finkelstein EA, Corso PS, Miller TR. Incidence and economic burden of injuries in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
3. Jennett B. Thirty years of the vegetative state: clinical, ethical and legal problems. 2005;150:537-43. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(05)50037-2.
4. Maas AI, Marmarou A, Murray GD, Teasdale SG, Steyerberg EW. Prognosis and clinical trial design in traumatic brain injury: the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(2):232-8. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0024.
5. Murray GD, Butcher I, McHugh GS, Lu J, Mushkudiani NA, Maas AI, et al. Multivariable prognostic analysis in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(2):329-37. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0035.
6. Mercier E, Boutin A, Lauzier F, Fergusson DA, Simard JF, Zarychanski R, et al. Predictive value of S-100beta protein for prognosis in patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;346:f1757. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1757.
7. Brant WE, Helms CA. Fundamentals of diagnostic radiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
8. Gentry LR, Godersky JC, Thompson B, Dunn VD. Prospective comparative study of intermediate-field MR and CT in the evaluation of closed head trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;150(3):673-82. doi: 10.2214/ajr.150.3.673.
9. Ommaya AK, Gennarelli TA. Cerebral concussion and traumatic unconsciousness: correlation of experimental and clinical observations of blunt head injuries. Brain. 1974;97(4):633-54.
10. Adams JH, Doyle D, Ford I, Gennarelli TA, Graham DI, McLellan DR. Diffuse axonal injury in head injury: definition, diagnosis and grading. Histopathology. 1989;15(1):49-59.
11. Gentry LR. Imaging of closed head injury. Radiology. 1994;191(1):1-17. doi: 10.1148/radiology.191.1.8134551.
12. Firsching R, Woischneck D, Klein S, Reissberg S, Dohring W, Peters B. Classification of severe head injury based on magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Neurochir. 2001;143(3):263-71.
13. Higgins JPT, Green S, (Editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
14. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005.
15. Hayden JA, van der Windt DA, Cartwright JL, Cote P, Bombardier C. Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(4):280-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00009.
16. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529-36. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009.
17. Schueler S, Schuetz GM, Dewey M. The revised QUADAS-2 tool. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(4):323. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-4-201202210-00018. author reply -4.
18. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61602-x.
19. Huguet A, Hayden JA, Stinson J, McGrath PJ, Chambers CT, Tougas ME, et al. Judging the quality of evidence in reviews of prognostic factor research: adapting the GRADE framework. Syst Rev. 2013;2:71. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-71.
20. Chastain CA, Oyoyo UE, Zipperman M, Joo E, Ashwal S, Shutter LA, et al. Predicting outcomes of traumatic brain injury by imaging modality and injury distribution. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26(8):1183-96. doi: 10.1089/neu.2008.0650.