Shared entanglements – Web 2.0, info-liberalism & digital sharing

Information Communication and Society

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 489-503

  Banning, Marlia E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

affective situation; digital sharing; entanglement; info liberalism; neoliberal capitalism; socio technical apparatus

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955210556     PISSN: 1369118X     EISSN: 14684462     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1061573     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. G.Agamben, (2009). What is an apparatus? And other essays. (D. Kishik & S. Pedatella, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2. S.Ahmed, (2010). Happy objects. In M.Gregg & G.J.Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 29–51). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3. P.Aigrain, (2012). Sharing: Culture and the economy in the Internet age. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
4. M.Andrejevic, (2009). iSpy: Surveillance and power in the interactive era. Lawrence: University of Kansas.
5. M.Andrejevic, (2013). Whither-ing critique. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 10, 222–228. doi: 10.1080/14791420.2013.812592
6. M.Banning, (2013). Manufacturing uncertainty: Contemporary U.S. public life and the conservative right. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
7. K.Barad, (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
8. R.Belk, (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 715–734. Retrieved from http://0-www.jstor.org.libraries.colorado.edu/stable/10.1086/612649 doi: 10.1086/612649
9. R.Belk, (2014, May 22). You are what you can access: Sharing & collaborative consumption. Keynote paper presented at the Digital Sharing pre-conference at the International Communication Association, Seattle, WA.
10. Y.Benkler, (2004). Sharing nicely: On shareable goods and the emergence of sharing as a modality of economic production. The Yale Law Journal, 114, 273–358. Retrieved from http://www.yalelawjournal.org/essay/sharing-nicely-on-shareable-goods-and-the-emergence-of-sharing-as-a-modality-of-economic-production doi: 10.2307/4135731
11. S.Biddle, (2014, December 20). Justice Sacco is good at her job, and how I came to peace with her. Gawker. Retrieved from http://gawker.com/justine-sacco-is-good-at-her-job-and-how-i-came-to-pea-1653022326
12. W.E.Bijker,, T.P.Hughes,, & T.Pinch, (1987). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
13. I.Bogost, (2007). Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. I.Bogost, (2008). The rhetoric of video games. In K.Salem (Ed.), The ecology of games: Connecting youth, games and learning (pp. 117–140). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. T.Brennan, (2004). The transmission of affect. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
16. M.Callon, (2006). What does it mean to say that economics is performative? (Working Paper No. 005). Centre de Sociologie de I'Innovations.
17. D.Cameron, (2000). Good to talk? Living and working in a communication culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. T.J.Catlaw, & B.Sandberg, (2014). ‘Dangerous government’: Info-liberalism, active citizenship, and the open government directive. Administration & Society, 46, 223–254. doi: 10.1177/0095399712461912
19. P.T.Clough, (2010). The affective turn: Political economy, biomedia, and bodies. In M.Gregg & G.J.Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 206–225). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
20. W.E.Connolly, (2011). A world of becoming. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
21. T.Cook, (2014). A message from Tim Cook about Apple's commitment to your Privacy. Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/privacy/
22. D.Coole,, & S.Frost, (Eds.). (2010). New materialism: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
23. M.Cooper, (2008). Life as surplus: Biotechnology & capitalism in the neoliberal era. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
24. J.Dean, (2002). Publicity's secret: How technoculture capitalizes on democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
25. Federal Trade Commission. (2014). Data brokers: A call for transparency and accountability. Retrieved from https://www.ftc.gov/reports/data-brokers-call-transparency-accountability-report-federal-trade-commission-may-2014
26. M.Foucault, (1972). The confession of the flesh. In C.Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews & other writings 1972–1977 (pp. 194–228). New York, NY: Pantheon.
27. C.Fuchs, (2014). Digital labour and Karl Marx. New York, NY: Routledge.
28. M.Gatens, (2004). Privacy and the body: The publicity of affect. In B.Roessler (Ed.), Privacies: Philosophical evaluations (pp. 113–132). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
29. R.W.Gehl, (2011). The archive and the processor: The internal logic of Web 2.0. New Media Society, 13, 1228–1244. doi:10.1177/1461444811401735
30. A.Gibbs, (2001). Contagious feelings: Pauline Hanson and the epidemiology of affect. Australian Humanities Review. Retrieved from http://australianhumanitiesreview.org/archive/Issue-December-2001/gibbs.html
31. A.Gibbs, (2010). After affect: Sympathy, synchrony, and mimetic communication. In M.Gregg & G.J.Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 186–2005). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
32. T.Gillespie, (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T.Gillespie, P.J.Boszkowski & K.A.Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–193). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. T.Gillespie,, P.J.Boszkowski,, & K.A.Foot, (2014). Introduction. In T.Gillespie, P.J.Boszkowski, & K.A.Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 1–17). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. L.Gitelman, (2006). Always already new: Media, history, and the data of culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. L.Grossberg, (2010). Affect's future: Rediscovering the virtual in the actual. In M.Gregg & G.J.Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 309–338). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
36. B.Hallinan,, & T.Striphas, (2014). Recommended for you: The Netflix Prize and the production of algorithmic culture. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. Retrieved from http://nms.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/02/02/1461444814538646.full.pdf+html
37. G.Harman, (2010). Towards speculative realism: Essay and lectures. Winchester: Zero Books.
38. N.K.Hayles, (2010). Cybernetics. In W.J.T.Mitchell & M.B.N.Hansen (Eds.), Critical terms for media studies (pp. 145–156). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39. A.Hess, (2014, January 6). Why women aren't welcome on the Internet. Pacific Standard. Retrieved from http://www.psmag.com/health-and-behavior/women-arent-welcome-internet-72170#.Usq9QZi5wZA.twitter
40. N.A.John, (2012). Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword. New Media & Society, 15, 167–182. doi:10.1177/1461444812450684
41. N.A.John, (2013). The social logics of sharing. The Communication Review, 16, 113–131. doi:10.1080/10714421.2013.807119
42. S.Lash, (2002). Critique of information. London: Sage.
43. A.Mager, (2012). Algorithmic ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 769–787. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.676056
44. B.Massumi, (2010). The future birth of the affective fact: The political ontology of threat. In M.Gregg & G.J.Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 52–70). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
45. B.Massumi, (2015). The power at the end of the economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
46. C.McDiad, (2014, February 13). Ethical growth hacking. Retrieved from http://www.adaptivemobile.com/blog/ethical-growth-hacking
47. M.F.Morell, (2011). The unethics of sharing: Wikiwashing. International Review of Information Ethics, 15, 9–16. Retrieved from http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/015/015_full.pdf
48. V.Moscoe, (2014). To the cloud: Big data in a turbulent world. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Press.
49. J.M.Pedersen, (2010). Introduction: Property, commoning and the politics of free software. The Commoner, 14, 8–48. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/228319386_Introduction_Property_Commoning_and_the_Politics_of_Free_Software
50. E.Probyn, (2005). Blush: Faces of shame. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
51. J.Proveti, (2009). Political affect: Connecting the social and the somatic. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
52. J.Ronson, (2015, February 12). How one stupid tweet blew up Justice Sacco's life. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/15/magazine/how-one-stupid-tweet-ruined-justine-saccos-life.html
53. A.Ross, (2013). In search of the lost paycheck. In T.Scholz (Ed.), Digital labor: The Internet as playground and factory (pp. 13–32). New York, NY: Routledge.
54. D.Schiller, (1988). How to think about information. In V.Mosco & J.Wasko (Eds.), The political economy of information (pp. 27–43). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
55. D.Schiller, (1997). The information commodity: A preliminary view. In J.Davis, T.A.Hirschl, & M.Stack (Eds.), Cutting edge: Technology, information capitalism and social revolution (pp. 103–120). London: Verso.
56. D.Schiller, (1999). Digital capitalism: Networking the global market system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. D.Schiller, (2007). How to think about information. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
58. H.I.Schiller, (1981). Who knows: Information in the age of the Fortune 500. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
59. H.I.Schiller, (1984). Information and the crisis economy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
60. H.I.Schiller, (1989). Culture, Inc: The corporate takeover of American expression. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
61. T.Scholz, (2008). The Web 2.0 ideology. First Monday: Peer-reviewed journal on the Internet, 13(3). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/issue/view/263 doi: 10.5210/fm.v13i3.2138
62. T.Scholz, (2013). Digital labor: The Internet as playground and factory. New York: Routledge.
63. T.Scholz, (2014). Digital labor. Retrieved from http://digitallabor.org/
64. E.K.Sedwick, (2003). Touching feeling: Affect, performativity, pedagogy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
65. J.Söderberg,, & A.Daoud, (2012). Atoms want to be free too! Expanding the critique of intellectual property to physical goods. TripleC, 10(1), 66–77. Retrieved from http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/288
66. F.Stalder,, & W.Sützl, (2011). Ethics of sharing. International Review of Information Ethics, 15, 2–3. Retrieved from http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/015/015_full.pdf
67. D.Stern, (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York, NY: Basic Books.
68. K.Stewart, (2007). Ordinary affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
69. N.Thrift, (2008). Non-representational theory: Space politics, affect. London: Routledge.
70. N.Thrift, (2009). Understanding the affective spaces of political culture. In M.Smith, J.Davidson, L.Cameron, & L.Bondi (Eds.), Emotion, place and culture (pp. 79–95). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
71. N.Thrift, (2010). Understanding the material practices of glamour. In M.Gregg & G.J.Seigworth (Eds.), The affect reader (pp. 289–308). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
72. W.Ulrichhio, (2011). The algorithmic turn: Photosynth, augmented reality and the changing implications of the image. Visual Studies, 26(1), 25–35. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2011.548486
73. R.Williams, (1961). The long revolution. London: Chatto & Windus.
74. R.Williams, (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
75. A.Wittel, (2011). Qualities of sharing and their transformation in the digital age. International Review of Information Ethics, 15, 4–8. Retrieved from http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/015/015-Wittel.pdf