Identifying the Culprit: An International Perspective on the National Academy of Sciences Report on Eyewitness Identification Evidence

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 135-138

  Valentine, Tim ^a   Fitzgerald, Ryan J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; EXTERNAL VALIDITY; GUILT; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MEMORY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGY; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SIGNAL DETECTION; VALIDITY; WITNESS;

EID: 84955203770     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.3164     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Clark, S. E. (2005). A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 395-424. DOI:10.1007/s10979-005-5690-7.
2. Clark, S. E. (2012). Costs and benefits of eyewitness identification reform: Psychological science and public policy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 238-259. DOI:10.1177/1745691612439584.
3. Davis, J. P., Valentine, T., Memon, A., & Roberts, A. J. (2015). Identification on the street: A field comparison of police street identifications and video line-ups in England. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21, 9-27. DOI:10.1080/1068316X.2014.915322.
4. Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, G. H., McGorty, E. K., & Penrod, S. D. (2008). Forgetting the once-seen face: Estimating the strength of an eyewitness's memory representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 139-150. DOI:10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.139.
5. Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., Penrod, S. D., & McGorty, K. (2004). A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 687-706. DOI:10.1007/s10979-004-0565-x.
6. Devlin, P. (1976). Report to the Secretary of State for the Home Department on the Departmental Committee on Evidence of Identification in Criminal Cases. London: HMSO.
7. Palmer, M. A., & Brewer, N. (2012). Sequential line-up presentation promotes less-biased criterion setting but does not improve discriminability. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 247-255. DOI:10.1037/h0093923.
8. Steblay, N. K., Dysart, J. E., & Wells, G. L. (2011). Seventy-two tests of the sequential lineup superiority effect: A meta-analysis and policy discussion. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17, 99-139. DOI:10.1037/a0021650.
9. Valentine, T., & Davis, J. P. (Eds) (2015). Forensic facial identification: Theory and practice of identification from eyewitnesses, composites and CCTV. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
10. Valentine, T., Davis, J. P., Memon, A., & Roberts, A. (2012). Live showups and their influence on a subsequent video lineup. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 1-23. DOI:10.1002/acp.1796.