Personal health communities: A phenomenological study of a new health-care concept

Health Expectations

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 2091-2106

  Aarts, Johanna Wilhelmina Maria ^a   Vennik, Femke ^b   Nelen, Willianne L D M ^a   van der Eijk, Martijn ^a   Bloem, Bastiaan R ^a   Faber, Marjan J ^a   Kremer, Jan A M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Erasmus University Rotterdam   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Health reform; Internet; Patient empowerment; Patient participation; Quality of care

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; INTERNET; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MIDDLE AGED; PARKINSON DISEASE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SELF CARE;

ADULT; AGED; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HEALTH RECORDS, PERSONAL; HUMANS; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARKINSON DISEASE; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SELF CARE;

EID: 84955173707     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12177     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, Kohn LT, Maguire SK, Pike KC. Crossing the quality chasm. In: National Academy of Sciences NaP (ed) A new Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, 2001; 2-5.
2. Wagner EH, Bennett SM, Austin BT, Greene SM, Schaefer JK, Vonkorff M. Finding common ground: patient-centeredness and evidence-based chronic illness care. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2005; 11(Suppl 1): S7-S15.
3. Naik AD, Singh H. Electronic health records to coordinate decision making for complex patients: what can we learn from wiki? Medical Decision Making, 2010; 30: 722-731.
4. Richards T. Enlist the patients' help. BMJ, 2011; 343: d5827.
5. Greene J, Hibbard JH. Why does patient activation matter? An examination of the relationships between patient activation and health-related outcomes Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2012; 27: 520-526.
6. Van de Bovenkamp HM. The Limits of Patient Power: Examining Active Citizenship in Dutch Health Care. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam, 2010.
7. Tomes N. Patient empowerment and the dilemmas of late-modern medicalisation. Lancet, 2007; 369: 698-700.
8. Kremer JA, Van Der Eijk M, Aarts JW, Bloem BR. The individual formerly known as patient, TIFKAP. Minerva Medica, 2011; 102: 505.
9. Nijkrake MJ, Keus SH, Kalf JG et al. Allied health care interventions and complementary therapies in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 2007; 13(Suppl 3): S488-S494.
10. Frosch DL, Elwyn G. I believe, therefore I do. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2011; 26: 2-4.
11. Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stock R, Tusler M. Do increases in patient activation result in improved self-management behaviors? Health Services Research, 2007; 42: 1443-1463.
12. Van de Bovenkamp HM, Zuiderent-Jerak T. An empirical study of patient participation in guideline development: exploring the potential for articulating patient knowledge in evidence-based epistemic settings. Health Expectations, 2013. doi:10.1111/hex.12067. [Epub ahead of print].
13. Archer N, Fevrier-Thomas U, Lokker C, McKibbon KA, Straus SE. Personal health records: a scoping review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2011; 18: 515-522.
14. Greenhalgh T, Wood GW, Bratan T, Stramer K, Hinder S. Patients' attitudes to the summary care record and HealthSpace: qualitative study. BMJ, 2008; 336: 1290-1295.
15. Sheikh A, Cornford T, Barber N et al. Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: final qualitative results from prospective national evaluation in "early adopter" hospitals. BMJ, 2011; 343: d6054.
16. Zulman DM, Nazi KM, Turvey CL, Wagner TH, Woods SS, An LC. patient interest in sharing personal health record information: a web-based survey. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2011; 155: 805-810.
17. Wicks P, Massagli M, Frost J et al. Sharing health data for better outcomes on PatientsLikeMe. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2010; 12: e19.
18. Greenhalgh T, Stramer K, Bratan T, Byrne E, Mohammad Y, Russell J. Introduction of shared electronic records: multi-site case study using diffusion of innovation theory. BMJ, 2008; 337: a1786.
19. Shachak A, Jadad AR. Electronic health records in the age of social networks and global telecommunications. JAMA, 2010; 303: 452-453.
20. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ, 2000; 320: 114-116.
21. Giorgi A. The phenomenological movement and research in the human sciences. Nursing Science Quarterly, 2005; 18: 75-82.
22. Toscano SE, Montgomery RM. The lived experience of women pregnant (including preconception) post in vitro fertilization through the lens of virtual communities. Health Care for Women International, 2009; 30: 1014-1036.
23. Starks H, Trinidad SB. Choose your method: a comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 2007; 17: 1372-1380.
24. Reeves S, Albert M, Kuper A, Hodges BD. Why use theories in qualitative research? BMJ, 2008; 337: a949.
25. Verhaak CM, Smeenk JM, Evers AW, Kremer JA, Kraaimaat FW, Braat DD. Women's emotional adjustment to IVF: a systematic review of 25 years of research. Human Reproduction Update, 2007; 13: 27-36.
26. Schmidt L. Psychosocial burden of infertility and assisted reproduction. Lancet, 2006; 367: 379-380.
27. Langston JW. The Parkinson's complex: parkinsonism is just the tip of the iceberg. Annals of Neurology, 2006; 59: 591-596.
28. Gibbs L, Kealy M, Willis K, Green J, Welch N, Daly J. What have sampling and data collection got to do with good qualitative research? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2007; 31: 540-544.
29. Hycner RH. Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Studies, 1985; 8: 279-303.
30. Olsson L, Jakobson Ung E, Swedberg K, Ekman I. Efficacy of patient-centred care as an intervention in controlled trials - a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2013; 22: 456-465.
31. Osborn CY, Mayberry LS, Mulvaney SA, Hess R. Patient web portals to improve diabetes outcomes: a systematic review. Current Diabetes Reports, 2010; 10: 422-435.
32. Tuil WS, Verhaak CM, Braat DD, de Vries Robbe PF, Kremer JA. Empowering patients undergoing in vitro fertilization by providing Internet access to medical data. Fertility and Sterility, 2007; 88 : 361-368.
33. Kleinman A. Concepts and a model for the comparison of medical systems as cultural systems. Social Science & Medicine, 1978; 2: 85-93.
34. Pluut B Het landelijk EPD als blackbox: besluitvorming en opinies in kaart Wetenschappelijke Raad voor Regeringsbeleid (WRR), 2010. Available at: http://bettinepluut.nl/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/WRR-Webpublicatie-nr.-45-Het-Landelijk-EPD-als-Blackbox.pdf, accessed 22 June 2013.
35. Campbell NC, Murray E, Darbyshire J et al. Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. BMJ, 2007; 334: 455-459.
36. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 2004; 24: 105-12.
37. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research Principles and Methods. 7th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004.
38. Bengoa RK, Key P, Leatherman S, Massoud R, Saturno P. Quality of care: a process for making strategic choices in health systems. In: Organization WH (ed). Geneva: World Health organization, 2006; 10: 10-20.
39. van Empel IWH, Aarts JWM, Cohlen BJ, Laven J, Huppelschoten A, Nelen WLDM, Kremer JAM. Measuring patient-centredness, the neglected outcome in fertility care: a random multicentre study. Human Reproduction, 2010; 25: 2516-2526.
40. van der Eijk M, Faber MJ, Ummels I, Aarts JWM, Munneke M, Bloem BR. Patient-centredness in PD care: development and validation of a patient experience questionnaire. Parkinsonism Related Disorders, 2012; 18: 1011-1016.