Introduction: Some surprises for psychologists

The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Volume II Classic Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-14

  Tomasello, Michael ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY ANTHROPOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955152348     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Editorial

References (43)

1. Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
2. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics:Exploring language structure and use. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
3. Bolinger, D. (1977), Meaning and form. New York:Longman.
4. Braine, M. (1976). Children’s first word combinations. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 41(No. 1).
5. Brooks, P., & Tomasello, M. (1999). How young children constrain their argument structure constructions. Language, 75, 720–738.
6. Brooks, P., Tomasello, M., Lewis, L., & Dodson, K. (1999). How children avoid argument structure errors:The entrenchment hypothesis. Child Development, 70, 1325–1337.
7. Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425–455.
8. Bybee, J., & Scheibman, J. (1999). The effect of usage on degrees of constituency:The reduction of don’t in English. Linguistics, 37, 575–596.
9. Bybee, J., & Thompson, S. (in press). Three frequency effects of syntax. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society.
10. Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, conciousness, and time. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
11. Chafe, W. (1998). Language and the flow of thought. In M.Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language:Cognitive and functional approaches (pp. 111–150). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B.F.Skinner’s “Verbal behavior.” Language, 35, 26–58.
13. Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 1–61.
14. Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K.Hale & S.Keyser (Eds.), A view from Building 20 (pp. 1–53). Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
15. Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language:A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 980–999.
16. Croft, W. (2000). Explaining language change; An evolutionary approach. London: Longman.
17. Croft, W. (2002). Radical construction grammar. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
18. Gullicover, P. (1999). Syntactic nuts. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
19. DeLaucey, S. (1981). An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language, 57, 626–657.
20. Dryer, M. (1997). Are grammatical relations universal? In J.Bybee, J.Haiman, & S.Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type (pp. 115–144). Amsterdam, Netherlands:John Benjamins.
21. Fillmore, C., Kaye, P., & O’Connor, M. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions:The case of let alone. Language, 64, 501–538.
22. Fox, B., & Thompson, S. (1990). A discourse explanation of “The Grammar” of relative clauses in English conversation. Language, 66, 297–316.
23. Givón, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York:Academic Press.
24. Givón, T. (1995). Functionalism and grammar. Amsterdam, Netherlands:John Benjamim.
25. Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions:A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
26. Jackendoff, R. (1996). Twistin’ the night away. Language, 73, 534–559.
27. Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations. Language, 75, 1–33.
28. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things:What categories reveal about the mind. Chi cago:University of Chicago Press.
29. Lakoff, G. (1990). The Invariance Hypothesis:Is abstract reason based on image schemas? Cogtitive Linguistics, 1, 39–74.
30. Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vo. 1). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
31. Lieven, E., Pine, J., & Baldwin, G. (1997). Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language, 24, 187–220.
32. Michaelis, L., & Lambrecht, K. (1996). Toward a construction-based theory of language funetion:T he case of nominal extraposition. Language, 72, 215–247.
33. Miller, J., & Weinert, R. (1998). Spontaneous spoken language. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
34. Nunberg, G., Sag, I., & Wasow, T. (1994). Idioms. Language, 70, 491–538.
35. Olson, D. (1994). The world on paper. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
36. Pawley, A., & Snyder, F. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory. In J.Richards & R.Smith (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 185–209). New York: Longman.
37. Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition:The acquisition of verb—argument structure. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
39. Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules. New York:Morrow Press.
40. Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, and collocation. Oxford:Oxford University Press. Thompson, S., & Hopper, P. (in press). Transitivity, clause structure, and argument structure:Evidence from conversation. In J.Bybee & P.Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergrnce of linguistic structure, Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
41. Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs:A case study in early grammatical development. New York:Cambridge University Press.
42. Tomasello, M. (1998). Introduction:The cognitive—functional perspective on language structure. In M.Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language:Cognitive and functional ap proaches to language structure (pp. 1–25). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Tomasello, M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition. 74, 209–253.