Social interaction and grammar

The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Volume II Classic Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 119-144

  Ford, Cecilia E ^a   Fox, Barbara A ^b   Thompson, Sandra A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955116417     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (92)

1. ashby, W. (1988). The syntax, pragmatics, and sociolinguistics of left- and right-dislocations in French. Lingua, 76, 203–229.
2. auer, P. (1992). The neverending sentence: Rightward expansion in spoken language. In M. Kontra & T.váradi (Eds.), Studies in spoken languages: English, German, Finno-Ugric (pp. 41–59). Budapest: Linguistics Institute, Hungarian academy of Sciences.
3. auer, P. (1996). On the prosody and syntax of turn-continuations. In E, Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation (pp. 57–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bybee, J. (1985). Morphology. amsterdam: John Benjamins.
6. Bvbee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(5). 425–455.
7. Bybee, J. (1998). The emergent lexicon. Chicago Linguistic Society, 34, 421–435.
8. Bybee, J. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Bybee, J. (in press), Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In R. Janda & B.Joseph (Eds.), Handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
10. Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Chafe, W. (1984). How people use adverbial clauses. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 10, 437–449.
12. Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Clark, H.H. (1996a). Communities, commonalities, and relativity. In J.Gumperz & S.C., Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 324–355). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Clark, H.H., (1996b). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Clark, H.H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22. 1–39.
16. Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic categories and grammatical relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Dahl, Ö. (1997). Egocentricity in discourse and syntax. available from http://www.ling. su.se/staff/oesten/egocentric.
18. dixon, R.M.W. (1977). Where have all the adjectives gone? Studies in Language, 1, 1–80.
19. du Bois, J., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Paolino, D., & Cumming, S. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In J.a. Edwards & M.d.Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding methods for language research (pp. 45–89). Hillsdale, nJ: Lawrence Erlbaum associates.
20. Edelman, G.M. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind. new York: HarperCollins.
21. Englebretson, R. (1997). Genre and grammar: Predicative and attributive adjectives in spoken English. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 23, 411–421.
22. Ferris, d.G. (1993). The meaning of syntax: A study in the adjectives of English. London: Longman.
23. Fillmore, C. (1981). Pragmatics and the description of discourse. In P.Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 143–166). new York: academic: Press.
24. Ford, C.E. (1993). Grammar in interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Ford, C.E., & Thompson, S.a. (1986). Conditionals in discourse: a text-based study from English. In E.C.Traugott, a.ter Meulen, J.S.Reilly, & C.a.Ferguson (Eds.), On conditionals (pp. 353–372). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Fox, B.a. (1986). Local patterns and general principles in cognitive processes: anaphora in written and conversational English. Text, 6, 25–51.
27. Fox, B.a. (1987). Anaphora and the structure of discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Fox, B.a., Hayashi, M., & Jasperson, R. (1996). a cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In E.Ochs, E.Schegloff, & S.a.Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 185–237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Fujii, n., & Ono, T. (2000). The occurrence and non-occurrence of the Japanese direct object marker o gin conversation. Studies in Language, 24(1), 1–39.
30. Geluykens, R. (1992). From discourse process to grammatical construction: On leftdisloction in English. amsterdam: John Benjamins.
31. Givón, T. (1980). The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements. Studies in Language, 4(3), 333–377.
32. Givón, T. (1983). Topic continuity. new York: academic Press.
33. Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). new York: Irvington.
34. Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. new York: academic Press.
35. Goodwin, C. (1989). Turn construction and conversational organization. In B.dervin, L. Grossberg, B.J.O’Keefe, & E.Wartella (Eds.), Rethinking communication: Vol. 2. Paradigm exemplars (pp. 88–101). newbury Park, Ca: Sage.
36. Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M.H. (1987). Concurrent operations on talk: notes 011 the interactive organization of assessments. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics, 1(1), 1–54.
37. Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M.H. (1992a). assessments and the construction of context. In C. Goodwin & a.duranti (Eds.), Rethinking context (pp. 147–189). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M.H. (1992b). Context, activity and participation. In P.auer & a.di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 77–99). amsterdam: John Benjamins.
39. Goodwin, M.H. (1980). Processes of mutual monitoring implicated in the production of description sequences. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 303–317.
40. Haiman, J. (1994). Ritualization and the development of language. In W.Pagliuca (Ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization (pp. 3–28). amsterdam: John Benjainins.
41. Haiman, J. (1998). Talk is cheap. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Hayashi, M. (1994). a comparative study of self-repair in English and Japanese conversation. In n.akatsuka (Ed.), Japamse/Korean linguistics (vol. v, pp. 77–93). Stanford, Ca: CSLI.
43. Hayashi, M. (2000). Practices in joint utterance construction in Japanese conversation. doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado.
44. Heritage, J.C., & Roth, a.L. (1995). Grammar and institution: Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview. Rasearch on Language and Social Interaction, 28(1), 1–60.
45. Hinds, J. (1982). Ellipsis in Japanese. Carbondale, IL, and Edmonton, alberta: Linguistic Research, Inc.
46. Hopper, P.J. (1987). Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 13, 139–157.
47. Hopper, P.J. (1988). Emergent grammar and the a Priori Grammar constraint. In d.Tannen (Ed.). Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and understanding (pp. 117–134). norwood, nJ: ablex.
48. Iwasaki, S. (1993). Subjectivity in grammar and discourse. amsterdam: John Benjamins.
49. Iwasaki, S., & Tao, H. (1993, January). A comparative study of the structure of the intonation unit in English, Japanese, and Mandarin Chinese, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of america, Los angeles, Ca.
50. Jefferson, G. (1973). a case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tagpositioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica, 9, 47–96.
51. Jefferson, G. (1978). Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In J.Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 219–248). new York: academic Press.
52. Jefferson, G. (1983). notes on some orderliness of overlap onset. In v.d’Urso & P.Leonardi (Eds.), Discourse analysis and natural rhetoric (pp. 11–38). Padua: Cleup.
53. Kuno, S. (1973). The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press.
54. Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequistes, Stanford, Ca: Stanford University Press.
55. Lerner, G.H. (1991). On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society, 20(3), 441–458.
56. Lerner, G.H. (1996). On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E.Ochs, E.Schegloff, & S.a.Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 238–276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Matsuda, K. (1996). Variable case-marking of (o) in Tokyo Japanese. Philadelphia: Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Pennsylvania.
58. Maynard, S. (1989). Japanese conversation: Setf-contextualization through structure and interactional management. norwood, nJ: ablex.
59. noonan, M. (1985). Complementation. In T.Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (vol. II, pp. 42–139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Ochs, E. (1983). Planned and unplanned discourse. In E.Ochs & B.Schieffelin (Eds.), Aequiring conversational competence (pp. 129–157). London: Routledge.
61. Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. (1983). Topic as a discourse notion. In E.Ochs & B.Schieffelin (Eds.), Acquiring conversational competence (pp. 158–174). London: Routledge.
62. Ono, T., & Thompson, S.a. (1997). On deconstructing “zero anaphora.#x201D; Berkeley Linguistics Society, 23, 481–491.
63. Ono, T., Thompson, S.a., & Suzuki, R. (2000). The pragmatic nature of the so-called subject marker ga in Japanese: Evidence from conversation. Discourse Studies, 2(1), 55–84.
64. Pomerantz, A. (1984). agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M.atkinson & J.Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
66. Sacks, H. (1972). On the analyzability of stories by children. In J.J.Gumperz & d.Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics (pp. 245–325). new York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
67. Sacks, H. (1974). an analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In R.Bauman & J.Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 337–353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. Sacks, H. (1987). On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G.Button & J.R.F.Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 54–69). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
69. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). a simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
70. Schachter, P. (1985). Parts-of-speech systems. in t.Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (Vol. 1, pp. 3–61). cambridge: cambridge University Press.
71. Schegloff, E. (1987). recycled turn beginnings: a precise repair mechanism in conversation’s turn taking organisation. in G.Button & J.r.lee (eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 70–85). clevedon: multilingual matters.
72. Schegloff, E. (1993). Reflections on language, development, and the interactional character of talk-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(1), 139–153.
73. Schegloff, E. (1995). Discourse as an interactional achievement iii: the omnirelevance of action. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 185–211.
74. Schegloff, E. (1996a). issues of relevance for discourse analysis: contingency in action, interaction, and co-participant context. in e.H.Hovy & d.r.Scott (eds.), Computational and conversational discourse (pp. 3–35). new York: Springer.
75. Schegloff, E. (1996b). turn organization: one direction for inquiry into grammar and interaction. in e. ochs, e.Schegloff, & S.a.thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133). cambridge: cambridge University Press.
76. Schegloff, E., & Sacks, H. (1973). opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327. (reprinted in Baugh & Sherzer, eds., 1984, englewood cliffs, nJ: Prentice-Hall)
77. Scheibman, J. (2000). I dunno… a usage-based account of the phonological reduction of don #x2019;t in american english conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 105–124.
78. Scheibman, J. (2001). local patterns of subjectivity in person and verb type in american english conversation. in J.Bybee & P.Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistie structure (pp. 61–89). amsterdam: John Benjamins.
79. Scheibman, J. (in press). Structural patterns of subjectivity in American English conversation. amsterdam: John Benjamins.
80. Shibatani, m. (1990). The languages of Japan. cambridge: cambridge University Press.
81. Strauss, S., & Kawanishi, Y. (1996). assessment strategies in Japanese, Korean, and american. in n.akatsuka, S.iwasaki, & S.Strauss (eds.), Japanese-Korean linguistics (pp. 149–165). Stanford, ca: center for the Study of language and information.
82. Sweetser, e. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantics. cambridge: cambridge University Press.
83. tanka, H. (1999). Turn-taking in Japanes conversation: A study in grammar and interaction. amsterdam: John Benjamins.
84. Tao, H. (1992). NP intonation units and referent identification. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 18, 237–247.
85. tao, H. (1996). Units in Mandarin conversation: Prosody, discourse and grammar. amsterdam: John Benjamins.
86. tao, H. (2001). discovering the usual with corpora: the case of remember. in r.c.Simpson & J.m.Swales (eds.), Corpus linguistics in North America (pp. 116–144). ann arbor: University of michigan Press.
87. thompson, S.a. (1987). #x201C;Subordination” and narrative event structure. in r.tomlin (ed.). Coherence and gmunding in discourse (pp. 435–454). amsterdam: John Benjamins.
88. thompson, S.a. (1988). a discourse approach to the cross-linguistic category “adjective.#x201D; in J.a.Hawkins (ed.), Explaining language universals (pp. 167–185). oxford: Basil Blackwell.
89. Uhmann, S. (1996). on rhythm in everyday German conversation: Beat clashes in assessment utterances. in e.couper-Kuhlen & m.Setting (eds.), Prosody in conversation (pp. 303– 365). cambridge: cambridge University Press.
90. Weber, F. (1993). Varieties of questions in English conversation. amsterdam: John Benjamins.
91. Weber, t. (1997). the emergence of linguistic structure: Paul Hopper’s emergent grammar hypothesis revisited. Language Sciences, 19(2), 177–196.
92. Wetzer, H. (1996), The typology of adjectival predicalion. new York: mouton de Gruyter.