Quantitative risk assessment in supply chains: A case study based on engineering risk analysis concepts

International Series in Operations Research and Management Science

Volumn 152, Issue , 2011, Pages 105-131

  Deleris, Léa A ^a   Erhun, Feryal ^b  

^a IBM RESEARCH   (Ireland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955104525     PISSN: 08848289     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8191-2_5     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. Aichlmayr M (2001) Future of JIT: time will tell. Transport Distrib 18–23
2. Apostolakis GE (2004) How useful is quantitative risk assessment? Risk Anal 24(3):515–520
3. Barrett L (2001) Cisco’s $2.25 billion mea culpa. CNET news.com. May 9
4. Cachon GP (2003) Supply chain coordination with contracts. In: de Kok AG, Graves SC (eds.) Handbooks in operations research and management science - supply chain management: design, coordination and operation. Kluwer, pp. 229–340
5. Chen F, Federgruen A (2000) Mean-variance analysis of basic inventory models. Working paper, Columbia University, New York, NY
6. Chopra S, Sodhi MS (2004) Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 46(1):53–61
7. Coleman BJ, Jennings KM (1998) The UPS strike: lessons for just-in-timers. Prod Inventory Manag J Fourth Quarter, 63–67
8. Davis T (1993) Effective supply chain management. Sloan Manag Rev 35–46
9. Deleris LA, Elkins D, Paté-Cornell ME (2004) Analyzing losses from hazard exposure: a conservative probabilistic estimate using supply chain risk simulation. In Ingalls RG, Rossetti MD, Smith JS, Peters BA (eds.) Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey
10. Deleris LA, Erhun F (2005) Risk management in supply networks using Monte-Carlo simulation. In: KuhlME, Steiger NM, Armstrong FB, Joines JA (eds.) Proceedings of the 2005Winter Simulation Conference. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey
11. Drake EM, Kalelkar AS (1979) Risk analysis of LNG systems. Paper presented at the Cryogenic Engineering Conference, Madison, Wisconsin
12. Erhun F, Gonçalves P, Hopman J (2007) Managing new product transitions. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 48(3):73–80 (Reprint Number 48311)
13. Garrick BJ (1984) Recent case studies and advancements in probabilistic risk assessment. Risk Anal 4(4):267–279
14. Health & Safety Executive (1978) Canvey – an investigation of potential hazard from operations in the Canvey Island/Thurrock area, London, HMSO
15. Health & Safety Executive (1981) Canvey – a second report, London, HMSO
16. Hendricks KB, Singhal VR (2005) Association between supply chain glitches and operating performance. Manag Sci 51(5):695–711
17. Hicks DA (1999) A four step methodology for using simulation and optimization technologies in strategic supply chain planning. In: Farrington PA, Nembhard HB, Sturrock DT, Evans GW (eds.) Proceedings of the 1999Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1215–1220. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey
18. Howard RA, Matheson JE (1984) Influence diagrams. In: Howard RA, Matheson JE (eds.) The principles and applications of decision analysis, Vol. 2 pp. 719–762. SDG, Menlo Park, California
19. Ingalls RG (1999) CSCAT: The Compaq supply chain analysis tool. In: Farrington PA, Nembhard HB, Sturrock DT, Evans GW (eds.) Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1201–1206. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey
20. Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New York, NY
21. Kirwan B (1994) A guide to practical human reliability assessment. Taylor & Francis, Bristol, PA
22. Kleindorfer PR, Saad GH (2005) Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Prod Oper Manag, 14(1):53–68. Spring
23. Koch C (2004) Nike rebounds: How (and Why) Nike recovered from its supply chain disaster. CIO Magazine
24. Kumamoto H, Henley EJ (1996) Probabilistic risk assessment and management for engineers and scientists, 2nd edn. IEEE, NY
25. Latour A (2001) Trial by fire: a blaze in albuquerque sets off major crisis for cell-phone giants – Nokia handles supply shock with Aplomb as Ericsson of Sweden gets burned – Was Sisu the difference? Wall St J p. A1. April 29
26. Lee HL (1996) Effective management of inventory and service through product and process redesign. Oper Res 44:151–159
27. Lee HL, Billington C (1992) Managing supply chain inventory: pitfalls and opportunities. Sloan Manage Rev 65–73
28. Lemos R Report: rise in virus attacks costs firms dearly. CNET News.com. March 19, (2004)
29. Macalister T (2002) Land rover settles parts squabble. Guardian February 19
30. Martínez-de Albéniz V, Simchi-Levi D (2005) A portfolio approach to procurement contracts. Prod Oper Manag 14(1):90–114. Spring
31. Moore J (1999) Increase in memory chip prices after Taiwan quake to tarnish earnings. CNN Money October 18
32. Murphy JV (2005) Resiliency: bouncing back when disaster strikes – A conversation with Yossi Sheffi. SupplyChainBrain.com
33. Newman RG (1989) Single sourcing short-term savings versus long-term problems. J Purch Mater Manag 20–24.Summer
34. Paté-Cornell ME (1993) Learning from the piper alpha accident: a post-mortem analysis of technical and organizational factors. Risk Anal 13(2):215–232
35. Paté-Cornell ME, Fishbeck PS (1993) Probabilistic risk analysis and risk-base priority scale for the tiles of the space shuttle. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 40(3):221–238
36. Paté-Cornell ME, Lakats LM, Murphy DM, Gaba DM (1997) Anesthesia patient risk: a quantitative approach to organizational factors and risk assessment. Risk Anal 17(4):511–23
37. Paté-Cornell ME, Tagaras G (1986) Risk costs for new dams: economic analysis and effects of monitoring. Water Resour Res 22(1):5–14
38. Peck H, Juttner U (2002) Risk management in the supply chain. Centre for Logistics and Transportation, School of Management, Cranfield University, Bedford, UK
39. Pender K (2002) Lockout’s effect on stocks. San Francisco Chronicle p. B1. October 3
40. Prater E, Biehl M, Smith MA (2001) International supply chain agility, tradeoffs between flexibility and uncertainty. Int J Oper Prod Manag 21(5/6):823–839
41. Raiffa H (1968) Decision analysis. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA
42. Rasmussen J, Duncan K, Leplat J (eds.) (1987) New technology and human error. Wiley, Chichester, NY
43. Reason J (1997) Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Ashgate, Brookfield, VT
44. Rice JB (2005) MG rover’s supply chain disruption. Supply Chain Strategy Article Reprint No: P0507D
45. Sachon M, Paté-Cornell ME (2000) Delays and safety in airline maintenance. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 67:301–309
46. Sheffi Y (2005) The resilient enterprise: overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage. MIT, Cambridge, MA
47. Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236:280–286
48. Tang CS (2006) Perspectives in supply chain risk management. Int J Prod Econ 103(2):451–488
49. Tomlin B (2006) On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply-chain disruption risks. Manag Sci 52(5):639–657
50. Treece JB (1997) Fire will slow Toyota exports to U.S. Automotive News, Crain Communications, Inc February 10
51. Tufte ER (1983) The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics, Cheshire, Connecticut
52. Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts
53. von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of games and economic behavior. 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
54. Waters-Fuller N (1995) Just-in-time purchasing and supply: a review of the literature. Int J Oper Prod Manag 15(9):220–236
55. Wreathall J, Nemeth C (2004) Assessing risk: the role of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) in patient safety improvement. Qual Safety Health Care 13(3):206–212
56. Yazlali Ö, Erhun F (2006) Managing demand uncertainty with dual supply contracts. Working paper, Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
57. Zsidisin GA, Panelli A, Upton R (2000) Purchasing organization involvement in risk assessments, contingency plans, and risk management: an exploratory study. Supply Chain Manag Int J 5(4):187–197