Effectiveness of peri-abortion counselling in preventing subsequent unplanned pregnancy: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 59-67

  Stewart, Hannah ^a   McCall, Stephen J ^a,b   McPherson, Calum ^a   Towers, Lucinda C ^a   Lloyd, Bethany ^a   Fletcher, Jack ^a   Bhattacharya, Sohinee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ABORTION; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COCHRANE LIBRARY; CONTRACEPTION; EMBASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURES; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COUNSELING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UNPLANNED PREGNANCY; COUNSELING; DECISION MAKING; FAMILY PLANNING; INDUCED ABORTION; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); PREGNANCY; SEXUAL EDUCATION; STANDARDS; WOMEN'S HEALTH; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

ABORTION, INDUCED; COUNSELING; DECISION MAKING; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, UNPLANNED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SEX EDUCATION; WOMEN'S HEALTH; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

EID: 84955064343     PISSN: 14711893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jfprhc-2014-101096     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Department of Health. Abortion Statistics, England and Wales: 2012. 2012. https: //www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment-data/file/307650/Abortion-statistics-England-and-Wales.pdf [accessed 15 May 2014].
2. Dempsey AR, Billingsley CC. Predictors of long acting reversible contraception use among unmarried young adults. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206: 526.
3. Sun Y, Che Y, Gao E, et al. Induced abortion and risk of subsequent miscarriage. Int J Epidemiol 2003; 32: 449-454.
4. Hogue CJ, Cates W, Tietze C. Impact of vacuum aspiration abortion on future childbearing: A review. Fam Plann Perspect 1983; 15: 119-126.
5. Eskild A, Vatten LJ, Nesheim BI, et al. The estimated risk of miscarriage should be corrected for induced abortion rates. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; 88: 569-574.
6. Klemetti R, Gissler M, Niinimäki M, et al. Birth outcomes after induced abortion: A nationwide register-based study of first births in Finland. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 3315-3320.
7. Woolner A, Bhattacharya S, Bhattacharya S. The effect of method and gestational age at termination of pregnancy on future obstetric and perinatal outcomes: A register-based cohort study in Aberdeen, Scotland. BJOG 2014; 121: 309-318.
8. Oliver-Williams C, Fleming M, Monteath K, et al. Changes in association between previous therapeutic abortion and preterm birth in Scotland, 1980 to 2008: A historical cohort study. PLoS Med 2013; 10: E1001481.
9. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill MPH, et al. Global causes of maternal death: A WHO systematic analysis. Lancet 2014; 2: 323-333.
10. World Health Organization (WHO). Unsafe Abortion: Global and Regional Estimates of the Incidence of Unsafe Abortion and Associated Mortality in 2008. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2011.
11. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (Update). 2014. http: //nice.org.uk/guidance/CG30 [accessed 10 April 2014].
12. Winner B, Piepert JF, Zhao Q, et al. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1998-2007.
13. Whitaker AK, Gilliam M. Contraceptive care for adolescents. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2008; 51: 268-280.
14. Michie L, Cameron ST. Improving the uptake of long acting reversible contraception: A review. Minerva Ginecol 2013; 65: 241-252.
15. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. BMJ 2011; 347: 5928.
16. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 264-269.
17. Nobili MP, Piergrossi S, Brusati V, et al. The effect of patient-centered contraceptive counseling in women who undergo a voluntary termination of pregnancy. Patient Educ Couns 2007; 65: 361-368.
18. Carneiro Gomes Ferreira AL, Souza AI, Pessoa RE, et al. The effectiveness of contraceptive counseling for women in the postabortion period: An intervention study. Contraception 2011; 84: 377-383.
19. Schunmann C, Glasier A. Specialist contraceptive counselling and provision after termination of pregnancy improves uptake of long-acting methods but does not prevent repeat abortion: A randomized trial. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 2296-2303.
20. Bender SS, Geirsson RT. Effectiveness of preabortion counseling on postabortion contraceptive use. Contraception 2004; 69: 481-487.
21. Zhu JL, Zhang WH, Cheng Y, et al. Impact of post-abortion family planning services on contraceptive use and abortion rate among young women in China: A cluster randomised trial. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2009; 14: 46-54.
22. Langston AM, Rosario L, Westhoff CL. Structured contraceptive counseling - A randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 2010; 81: 362-367.
23. Carneiro Gomes Ferreira AL, Lemos A, Figueiroa JN, et al. Effectiveness of contraceptive counselling of women following an abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2009; 14: 1-9.
24. Cameron ST, Glasier A, Chen ZE, et al. Effect of contraception provided at termination of pregnancy and incidence of subsequent termination of pregnancy. BJOG 2012; 119: 1074-1080.
25. World Health Organization (WHO) and the INFO Project JHBSoPHCfCP. Decision-Making Tool for Family Planning Clients and Providers. Baltimore, MD and Geneva, Switzerland: Bloomberg School of Public Health and WHO, 2005.