Discourse and grammar

The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Volume II Classic Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 47-88

  Du Bois, John W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955063171     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. Aissen, J. (1987). Tzotzit clause structure. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.
2. Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents, London: Routledge.
3. Ariel, M. (1998). Cognitive universals and linguistic conventions: The case of resumptive pronouns. Studies in Language, 23, 217–269.
4. Ariel, M. (2001). Accessibility theory: An overview. In T.Sanders, J.Schilperoord, & W. Spooren (Eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects (pp. 29–87). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
5. Ashby, W.J., & Bentivoglio, P. (1993). Preferred Argument Structure in spoken French and Spanish. Language Variation and Change, 5, 61–76.
6. Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In E.Wanner & L. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 173–218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Boas, F. (1911). Introduction. Handbook of American Indian languages, Part (pp. 1–83). Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 40. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
8. Chafe, W.L. (1970). Meaning and the structure of language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Chafe, W.L. (Ed.). (1980). The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10. Chafe, W.L. (1987). Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R.S.Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 21–51). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
11. Chafe, W.L. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Chafe, W. L., (1998). Language and the flow of thought. In M.Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp. 93–111). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Clancy, P.M. (1980). Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse. In W.L. Chafe (Ed.), The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production (pp. 127–202). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14. Clancy, P.M. (in press). The lexicon in interaction: Developmental origins of Preferred Argument Structure in Korean. In J.W.Du Bois, L.E.Kumpf, & W.J.Ashby (Eds.), Preferred Argument. Structure: Grammar as architecture for junction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
15. Clark, H.H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Du Bois. J.W. (1980). Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse. In W.L.Chafe (Ed.), The pear stories; Cognitive, cullural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production (pp. 203–274). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
17. Du Bois. J.W. (1985). Competing motivations. In J.Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (pp, 343–365). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
18. Du Bois, J.W. (1986). Self-evidence and ritual speech. In W.L.Chafe & J.Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp. 313–336). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19. Du Bois, J.W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 63, 805–855.
20. Du Bois, J.W. (2000). Santa Barbara corpus of spoken American English, Part I [3 CD-ROMs]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania. Du Bois, J.W., Kumpf, L.E., & Ashby, W.J. (Eds.). (in press). Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as architecture for function. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
21. Du Bois, J.W., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Cumming, S., & Paolino, D. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In J.A.Edwards & M.D.Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 45–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Du Bois, J.W., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Paolino, D., & Cumming, S. (1992), Discourse transcription. Santa Barbara papers in linguistics (Vol. 4). Santa Barbara: Department of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Barbara.
23. Durie, M. (in press). New light on information pressure: Information conduils, escape valves, and role alignment stretching. In J.W.Du Bois, L.E.Kumpf, & W.J.Ashby (Eds.), Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as architecture far function. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
24. Dutra, R. (1987). The hybrid S category in Brazilian Portuguese: Some implications for word order. Studies in Language, 11, 163–180.
25. Fillmore, C.J. (1977). Topics in lexical semantics. In R.W.Cole (Ed.), Current issues in linguistic theory (pp. 76–138). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
26. Firbas, J. (1966). Non-thematic sentences in contemporary English. Travaux linguistiqnes de Prague, 2, 239–256.
27. Ford, C.E., & Thompson, S.A. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic. intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E.Ochs, E.A. Schegloff, & S.A.Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 134–184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Fox, B. (1987). The noun phrase accessibility hierarchy reinterpreted: Subject primacy or the absolutive hypothesis? Language, 63, 856–870.
29. Fox, B., & Thompson, S.A. (1990). A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language, 66, 297–316.
30. Givon, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.
31. Givon, T. (Ed.). (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
32. Givon, T. (1992). The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions. Linguistics, 30, 5–55.
33. Givon, T. (1998). The functional approach to grammar. In M.Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp. 41–66), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Goldberg, A.E. (1998). Patterns of experience in patterns of language. In M.Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp. 203–219). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Harris, Z.S. (1951). Methods in structural linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Hopper, P.J. (1998). Emergent grammar. In M.Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp. 155–175). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Hopper, P.J., & Thompson, S.A. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56. 251–299.
38. Jakobson, R. (1990). On language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. Kumagai, Y. (2001). Preferred Argument Structure and discourse ergativity in English. Mulberry, 50, 77–90.
40. Kuno, S. (1972). Functional Sentence Perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic Inquiry, 3, 269–320.
41. Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
42. Langacker, R.W. (1998). Conceptualization, symbolizatioa, and grammar. In M.Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp. 1–39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Matsumoto, K. (1997). NPs in Japanese conversation. Pragmatics, 7, 163–181.
44. McGregor, W.B. (1999). #x201C;Optional” ergative marking in Gooniyandi revisited: Implications to the theory of marking. Leuvanse Bijdragen, 87, 491–534.
45. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46. Nichols, J., & Timberlake, A. (1991), Grammaticalization as retextualization. In E.C.Traugott & B.Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization: Vol. 1. Focus on theoretical and methodologi cal issues (pp. 129–146). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
47. Payne, D.L. (1987). Information structuring in Papago narrative discourse. Language, 63, 783–804.
48. Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistique generale [Course in general linguistics]. Paris: Payot.
49. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Schuetze-Coburn, S. (1987). Topic management and the lexicon: A discourse profile of three-argument verbs in German, Unpublished master’s thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
51. Smith, W. (1996). Spoken narrative and preferred clause structure: Evidence from modern Hebrew discourse. Studies in Language, 20, 163–189.
52. Thompson, S.A. (1997). Discourse motivations for the core-oblique distinction as a language universal. In A.Kamio (Ed.), Directions in functional linguistics (pp. 59–82). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
53. Thompson, S.A., & Mulac, A. (1991). A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In E.G.Traugott & B.Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization: Vol 2. Focus on type of grammatical markers (pp. 313–329). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
54. Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.