Toward a Foucauldian analysis of international regimes James F. Keeley

International Organization

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 1990, Pages 83-105

  Keeley, James F ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954838300     PISSN: 00208183     EISSN: 15315088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300004653     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Stephen D. Krasner, “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables,” in Stephen D. Krasner, ed., International Regimes (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1983), p. 2.
2. W. B. Gallie, “Essentially Contested Concepts,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1955–1956), pp. 167–198.
3. Christine Swanton, “On the ‘Essential Contestedness’ of Political Concepts,” Ethics 95 (July 1985), pp. 811–27.
4. Susan Strange, “Cave! Hic Dragones: A Critique of Regime Analysis,” in Krasner, International Regimes, pp. 338 and 344.
5. Charles Taylor, “Neutrality in Political Science,” in his Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, Philosophy and the Human Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp. 58–90.
6. Michel Foucault are of particular relevance: Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason (New York: Random House, 1965).
7. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (London: Tavistock, 1970).
8. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language (New York: Pantheon Books, 1972.
9. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception (London: Tavistock, 1973).
10. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (New York: Vintage Books, 1979).
11. Power!Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, edited by C. Gordon (New York: Pantheon Books, 1980).
12. The History of Sexuality, vol. 1, An Introduction (New York: Vintage Books, 1980).
13. Hubert L. Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983).
14. J. G. Merquior, Foucault (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985).
15. Allan Megill, Prophets of Extremity: Nietzsche, Heidegger, Foucault, Derrida (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985).
16. David C. Hoy, ed., Foucault: A Critical Reader (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986).
17. John G. Ruggie, “International Responses to Technology: Concepts and Trends,” International Organization 29 (Summer 1975), pp. 569–570.
18. Friedrich Kratochwil and John G. Ruggie, “International Organization: A State of the Art on the Art of the State,” International Organization 40 (Autumn 1986), p. 771, fn 65.
19. Stephan Haggard and Beth A. Simmons, “Theories of International Regimes,” International Organization 41 (Summer 1987), p. 500.
20. Michael J. Shapiro, G. Matthew Bonham, and Daniel Heradstveit, “A Discursive Practices Approach to Collective Decision-Making,” International Studies Quarterly 32 (December 1988), pp. 379–419.
21. William E. Connolly, “Michel Foucault: An Exchange,” Political Theory 13 (August 1985), pp. 365–385.
22. Oran Young's critique, “International Regimes: Toward a New Theory of Institutions,” World Politics 39 (October 1986), pp. 110–111.
23. Robert Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984), p. 6.
24. Brian Barry, “Methodology Versus Ideology: The ‘Economic’ Approach Revisited,” in Elinor Ostrom, ed., Strategies of Political Inquiry (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1982), pp. 123–147.
25. Krasner, International Regimes, p. 123, fn 16.
26. Eric Voegelin, “The Mongol Order of Submission to European Powers, 1245–1255,” Byzantion 15 (1941), pp. 378–413.
27. Eric Voegelin, The New Science of Politics: An Introduction (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1952), pp. 56–60.
28. Voegelin, “The Mongol Order,” pp. 405–6.
29. Thucydides, The Peloponnesian War (Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin Books, 1954), pp. 67–68.
30. Norman Frohlich, Joe A. Oppenheimer, and Oran R. Young, Political Leadership and Collective Goods (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1971), especially pp. 62–65.
31. Daniel Garst, “Thucydides and Neorealism,” International Studies Quarterly 33 (March 1989), pp. 3–27.
32. Duncan Snidal, “The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory,” International Organization 39 (Autumn 1985), especially p. 581, fn 5.
33. Todd M. Sandler, William Loehr, and John T. Cauley, The Political Economy of Public Goods and International Cooperation, vol. 15, book 3 (Denver, Colo.: University of Denver Monograph Series in World Affairs, 1978), p. 41.
34. Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1979), p. 198.
35. Hans Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: Knopf, 1967), p. 10.
36. E. H. Carr, The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939 (New York: Harper & Row, 1964).
37. Nils Orvik, “Defence Against Help: A Strategy for Small States?” Survival 15 (September-October 1973), pp. 228–231.
38. Nils Orvik, “Canadian Security and ‘Defence Against Help,”’ International Perspectives (May–June 1983), pp. 3–7.
39. Alfred A. MacKay, Arrow’s Theorem: The Paradox of Social Choice (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1980).
40. James D. Morrow, “Social Choice and System Structure in World Politics,” World Politics 41 (October 1988), pp. 75–97.
41. Keohane, After Hegemony, pp. 85–109.
42. Keohane, After Hegemony, pp. 99.
43. Keohane, After Hegemony, pp. 99 and 103–109.
44. Haggard and Simmons, “Theories of International Regimes,” pp. 500–504.
45. Haggard and Simmons, “Theories of International Regimes,” pp. 509–513.
46. Foucault, Discourse on Language, pp. 223–24.
47. “Two Lectures,” in Power!Knowledge, p. 82.
48. Peter Bachrach and Morton S. Baratz, “Two Faces of Power,” American Political Science Review 56 (December 1962), pp. 947–952.
49. Peter Bachrach and Morton S. Baratz, “Decisions and Non-Decisions,” American Political Science Review 57 (September 1963), pp. 632–642.
50. Foucault, Discipline and Punish, pp. 135–228.
51. Foucault, Discipline and Punish, pp. 257–308.
52. Erving Goffman, Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates (Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books, 1961), pp. 171–320.
53. George Orwell, Down and Out in Paris and London (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1961).
54. The Human Condition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958).
55. Walter L. Adamson, Hegemony and Revolution: A Study of Antonio Gramsci's Political and Cultural Theory (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980).
56. Robert W. Cox, “Labor and Hegemony,” International Organization 31 (Summer 1977), pp. 386–387.
57. T. Baumgartner, W. Buckley, and T. Burns, “Relational Control: The Human Structuring of Co-operation and Conflict,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 19 (September 1975), pp. 417–440.
58. Barry Smart, “The Politics of Truth and the Power of Hegemony,” in Hoy, Foucault: A Critical Reader, pp. 157–73.
59. Harold K. Jacobson, Networks of Interdependence: International Organizations and the Global Political System (New York: Knopf, 1979).
60. Foucault, “Two Lectures,” p. 102.
61. Foucault, History of Sexuality, vol. 1, pp. 23–35, 100–102, and passim.
62. Ernst B. Haas, “Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes,” World Politics 32 (April 1980), pp. 357–405.
63. History of Sexuality, vol. 1, pp. 154–155.
64. International Organization 29 (Summer 1975), pp. 830–838.
65. Haas, “Why Collaborate?” pp. 370–75 and 385–86.
66. Keohane, After Hegemony, pp. 90–91.
67. Vinod K. Aggarwal, Liberal Protectionism: The International Politics of Organized Textile Trade (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985), pp. 16–28.
68. Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition (Boston: Little, Brown, 1977), pp. 49–52.
69. Dreyfus and Rabinow, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, pp. 208–226.
70. Dreyfus and Rabinow, The History of Sexuality, vol. 1. In “Social Choice and System Structure,” p. 80.
71. Haas, “Why Collaborate?” pp. 370–75.
72. Haas, “Why Collaborate?” pp. 385–86.
73. Joseph M. Grieco, “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism,” International Organization 42 (Summer 1988), pp. 485–507.
74. James F. Keeley and Sheila K. Singh, “Atomic Discipline: The Creation of the Non-Proliferation Treaty,” paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Windsor, Canada, 1988.
75. James F. Keeley and Sheila K. Singh, “Before and After: The Comprehensive Test Ban and the Non-Proliferation Treaty,” paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Quebec City, Canada, 1989.
76. James F. Keeley, “A Structural Overview of Civilian Nuclear Cooperation Agreements,” paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Quebec City, Canada, 1989.
77. In David A. V. Fischer, The International Non-Proliferation Regime 1987 (New York: United Nations, 1987), p. 3.
78. Roger K. Smith, “Explaining the Non-Proliferation Regime: Anomalies for Contemporary International Relations Theory,” International Organization 41 (Spring 1987), pp. 253–281.
79. Mohamed I. Shaker, The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty: Origin and Implementation, 1959–1979 (London: Oceana Publications, 1980)
80. Stanley Ing, “Emergent Suppliers, the Non-Proliferation Regime and Regional Security,” in David B. Dewitt, ed., Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Global Security (London: Croom Helm, 1987), pp. 119–30.
81. Stephen M. Meyer, The Dynamics of Nuclear Proliferation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984), chaps. 1–3.
82. Joseph Nye, “Maintaining a Non-Proliferation Regime,” International Organization 35 (Winter 1981), especially pp. 34–35.
83. Arendt, The Human Condition, pp. 194–195.