The effect of copper sulphate on perfor-mance and the structure of the gizzard in broilers

British Poultry Science

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1973, Pages 69-97

  Board, R G ^a   Halls, N A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954836072     PISSN: 00071668     EISSN: 14661799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00071667308415999     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. ALLS, A. A., BENTON, N. J., KRAUSS, W. C. AND COVER, M. S. (1963). The mechanics of treating hatching eggs for disease prevention.Avian Dis., 7: 89–97.
2. ALLS, A. A., COVER, M. S., BENTON, W. J. AND KRAUSS, W. C. (1964). Treatment of hatching eggs for disease prevention—factors effecting permeability and a visual detection of drug absorption.Avian Dis., 8: 245–256.
3. ALMQUIST, H. J. AND HOLST, W. F. (1931). Variability of shell porosity in the hen's egg.Hilgardia, 6: 61–72.
4. BAUDRIMONT, A. AND MARTIN-ST-AUGE, G. J. (1847). Recherches sur les phemomenes chimigues de evolution embryonaire des eiseau et des bactracenis. Annls Chim. Phys., Sec. III. T. 21: 195-295-
5. BEAMENT, J. W. L. (1961). The water relations of insect cuticle.Biol. Rev., 36: 281–320.
6. BEAN, K. C. AND McLAURY, D. W. (1959). The bacterial contamination of hatching eggs and methods for its control.Poult. Set., 38: 693–698.
7. BELLAIRS, R. AND BOYDE, A. (1969). Scanning electron microscopy of the shell membranes of the hen's egg.Z• Zeforsc mikrosk. Anat., 96: 237–249.
8. BOARD, R. G. (1964). The growth of Gram-negative bacteria in the hen's egg.J. appl. Bact., 27: 350-353
9. BOARD, R. G. (1966). The course of microbial infection of the hen's egg.J. appl. Bad., 29: 319–341.
10. BOARD, R. G. (1968). Microbiology of the egg: a review. In:Egg Quality: A study of the Hen's Egg, pp. 133–162. Edit. carter, T. C. Edinburgh, Oliver and Boyd.
11. BOARD, R. G. (1969). The microbiology of the hen's egg.Adv. appl. Microbiol., 11: 245–281.
12. BOARD, P. A. AND BOARD, R. G. (1967). A method of studying bacterial penetration of the shell of the hen's egg.Lab. Prad., 16: 471, 472, 482.
13. BRANT, A. W. AND STARR, P. B. (1962). Some physical factors relating to egg spoilage.Poult. Sci., 41 : 1468–1473.
14. BRANT, A. W., STARR, P. B. AND HAMANN, J. A. (1966). Poultry Trihune: P. 65.
15. BROWN, W. E., BAKER, R. G. AND NAYLOR, N. B. (1965). The role of the inner shell membrane in bacterial penetration of chicken eggs.Poult. Sci., 44: 1323–1327.
16. BRYANT, R. L. AND SHARP, P. F. (1934). Effect of washing on the keeping quality of hen's eggs. J. agric. Res., 48: 67–89.
17. BROOKS, J. AND TAYLOR, D. I. (1955). Eggs and egg products.Rep. Fd Invest. Bd, 60. London, Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
18. BUCHLI, K. (1967). De invloed van het wassen op de microbiologische houdbaar-heid van het ei Instituut voor der Pluimveeteelt “Het Spelderholt”—Beekbergen Mededeling No. 145.
19. CARTER, T. C. (1969). The hen's egg: relationship between the shell thickness and the amount of organic matter in the shell. Br. Poult. Sci., 10: 165–174.
20. CATTANEO, G. (1877). Sulla produzione di micofiti nell 'intemo delle ova.Atti Soc. ital. Sci. nat., 20: 89–102.
21. COOKE, A. S. AND BALCH, D. A. (1970a). The distribution and carbohydrate composition of the organic matrix in hen egg shell.Br. Poult. Sci., 11: 353–365.
22. COOKE, A. S. AND BALCH, D. A. (1970). Studies of membrane, mammillary cores and cuticle of the hen egg shell.Br. Poult. Sci., 11: 345–352.
23. DUNN, L. C. (1923–1924). The variation of eggs in the rate at which they lose weight.Poult. Sci. 3: 136–148.
24. FOWLER, F. G. AND FOWLER, H. W. (1969). The Pocket Oxford Dictionary of Current English, 5th ed., Oxford, Clarendon Press.
25. FROMM D. (1959). A rapid method for the determination of egg shell permeability.Poult. Sci., 38 : 171 - 173.
26. FROMM D. AND MONROE R. J. (1960). Interior physical quality and bacterial contamination of market eggs as influenced by egg shell permeability.Fd Technol. Champaign., 14: 401–403.
27. GILLESPIE J. M. AND SCOTT W. J. (1950). Studies in the preservation of shell eggs. IV. Experiments on the mode of infection by bacteria. Aust. J. appl. Sci., 1: 514–530.
28. GILLESPIE J. M., SCOTT W. J. AND VICKERY, J. R. (1950a). Studies in the preservation of shell eggs. II. The incidence of bacterial rotting in unwashed eggs and eggs washed by hand. Aust. J. appl. Sci., 1: 215–223.
29. GILLESPIE J. M., SCOTT NULL, W. J. AND VICKERY J. R. (1950). Studies in the preservation of shell eggs. III. The storage of machine washed eggs.Aust. J. appl. Sci., 1: 531–538.
30. HAINES R. B. AND MORAN T. (1941). Porosity of, and bacterial invasion through the shell of the hen's egg.J. Hyg., Camb., 37: 453–461.
31. HARRISON G. F. (1969). Production of germ-free chicks: a comparison of the hatchability of eggs sterilized externally by different methods.Lab. Anims, 3: 51–59.
32. HARRY E. G. AND MCLLYTOCK, M. (1972). The production of disease free embryos and chicks. In:Safety in Microbiology, pp. 121–132. Edit. shapton D. A. and board R. G. London, Academic Press.
33. HARTUNG T. E. AND STADELMAN W. J. (1963). Pseudomonas fluorescens penetration of egg shell membranes as influenced by shell porosity, age of egg and degree of bacterial challenge. Poult. Sci., 42 : 147–150.
34. HAYS F. A. AND SUMBARDO A. M. (1926–1927). Physical characters of eggs in relation to hatchability.Poult. Sci., 6: 196–200.
35. HINTON H. E. (1969). Respiratory system of distinct insects.A. Rev. Ent., 14: 343–368.
36. KRARR A. A., McNALLY E. H. AND BRANT A. W. (1958). Shell quality and bacterial infection of shell eggs.Poult. Sci., 37: 638–644.
37. LACK D. (1968). Ecological Adaptations for Breeding in Birds. London, Methuen.
38. LIFSHITZ A., BAKER R. G. AND NAYLOR N. B. (1964). The relative importance of chicken egg exterior structure in resisting bacterial penetration. J. Fd Sci., 29: 94–99.
39. LORAH M. E., FUNK E. M. AND FORWARD J. (1954). Reducing spoilage in shell eggs by the use of fungicides.Missouri agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Bull., 573.
40. LORENZ F. W., STARR P. B., STARR M. P. AND OGASAWARA F. X. (1952). The development of Pseudomonas spoilage in shell eggs. I. Penetration through the shell.Fd Res., 17: 351–360.
41. MARSHALL W. AND CRUICKSHANK D. B. (1938). The function of the cuticle in relation to the porosity of eggs.J. agric. Sci., Camb., 28: 24–42.
42. McFARLAND L. Z., GARRETT R. L. AND NOWELL J. A. (1971). Normal egg shells and the egg shells caused by organochlorine insecticides viewed by the scanning electron microscope.Proc. 4th A. Scanning Electron Microsc. Symp., Chicago, 377–384.
43. MUELLER W. J. (1958). Shell porosity of chicken eggs. 1. CO2loss and CO2content of infertile eggs during storage. Poult. Sci., 37: 437–444.
44. NEWALL V. (1971). An Egg at Easter, a Folklore Story. Routledge and Kegan Paul: London.
45. PARRY R. T. (1970). Dipping hatching eggs in antibiotic solutions to reduce the spread of mycoplasma infections.Poult. Rev., 80: 90–95.
46. PATON A. M. AND AYRES J. C. (1964). Use of a fluorescent brightners for tracing passage of Salmonella in eggs. Nature, Lond., 204: 803–804.
47. PRINGLE E. M. AND BAROTT H. G. (1937). Loss of weight of hens' eggs during incubation under different conditions of humidity and temperature.Poult. Sci., 16: 49–52.
48. RATCLIFFE D. A. (1970). Changes attributable to pesticides in egg breakage frequency and egg shell thickness in some British birds.J. appl. Ecol., 7: 67–115.
49. RAUCH W. (1952). The influence of egg shell porosity on the number of chickens hatched from incubating eggs.Poult. Sci., 31: 589–594.
50. RAUCH W. (1954). Biophysikalische Messungen an Bruteiern.Arch. Gefliigelk., 18: 297–304.
51. RIZZO, A. (1899). Sul numero e sulla distributione jei pori nel guscio dell'ovo di gallina.Richerchie del Anat. Las. Roma., 7: 171–199.
52. ROMANKEWITSCH N. A. (1934). Das Kutikulum des Huhnereies. Z. Zellforsch. mikrosk. Anat., 21 : 110–118
53. ROMANOFF A. L. (1931). Why some eggs do not hatch.Cornell Univ. Bull, No. 205.
54. ROMANOFF A. L. (1943). Study of various factors effecting permeability of birds' eggshells.Fd Res., 8: 212–223.
55. ROMANOFF A. L. (1967). Biochemistry of the Avian Embryo. New York, Wiley.
56. ROMANOFF A. L. AND ROMANOFF A. J. (1949). The Avian Egg. New York, Wiley.
57. ROMJIN, C. (1950). Foetal respiration in the hen. Gas diffusion through the egg shell.Poult. Sci., 29 : 42–51.
58. ROMIJN C. AND ROOS, J. (1938). The air-space of the hen's egg and its changes during the period of incubation.J. Physiol. Lond., 94: 365–379
59. ROSSER F. T. (1942). Preservation of eggs. II. Surface contamination on egg shell in relation to spoilage.Can. J. Res., 20D: 291–296.
60. ROSSER F. T., WHITE W. H., WOODCOCK A. H. AND FLETCHER D. A. (1942). Preservation of eggs. I. Treatment for maintaining quality in shell eggs at ordinary temperatures.Can. J. Res., 20D: 57–70.
61. SEVIOUR E. M. AND BOARD R. G. (1972). The behaviour of mixed bacterial infections in the shell membranes of the hen's egg.Br. Poult. Sci., 13: 33–43.
62. SEVIOUR E. M. FSYKES, R. AND BOARD R. G. (1972). A microbiological survey of the incubated eggs of chickens and waterfowl.Br. Poult. Sci., 13: 549–556.
63. SHARP P. F. (1932). Detection of washed, abrased and oiled eggs.Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 24 : 941–950.
64. SHARP P. F. AND STEWART G. F. (1936). Effect of relative humidity on the growth of mold on eggs in storage.Cornell Univ. Agric. Exp. Sta. Memoir 191.
65. SIMONS P. C. M. AND WIERTZ G. (1966). The ultra-structure of the surface of the cuticle of the hen's egg in relation to egg cleaning.Poult. Sci., 45: 1153–1162.
66. SMITH A. J. M. (1934). The relations between yolk and white in the hen's egg. VI, The equilibrium between ice and egg-yolk, and the freezing-point difference between yolk and white.J. exp. Biol., 11: 228–242.
67. STOKES J. L. WOSBORNE, W. AND BAYNE, H. G. (1956). Penetration and growth of Salmonella in shell eggs. Fd Res., 21: 510–518.
68. STUART E. E. AND KEENUM R. D. (1970). Preincubation treatment of chicks hatching eggs infected withSalmonella pullorum. Avian Dis., 14 : 87–95.
69. TRUSSELL P. C. CFUVRON, O. AND CAMERON C. J. (1955). Bacterial spoilage of shell eggs. II. Incidence of spoilage ineggs from 94 farms. Fd Technol., Champaign, 19: 130–134.
70. TYLER C. (1945). The porosity of egg shells, and the influence of different levels of dietary calcium upon porosity.J. agric. Sci., 35: 168–176
71. TYLER C. (1953). Studies on egg shells, II. A method of marking and counting pores.J. Sc. Fd Agric., 4,: 266 - 273.
72. TYLER C. (1955). Studies on egg shells. VI. The distribution of pores in egg shells.J. Sci. Fd Agric., 3: 170–176.
73. TYLER C. (1956). Studies on egg shells. VII. Some aspects of structure as shown by plastic models.J. Sci. Fd Agric., 7: 483–493.
74. TYLER C. (1964). A translated and edited version of the work of Wilhelm von Nathusius on Avian Eggshells. The University, Reading.
75. TYLER C. (1969a). The distribution of pores in the egg shells of the domestic fowl: a further study.Br. Poult. Sci., 10: 375–380.
76. TYLER C. (1969). Avian eggs: their structure and characteristics.Int. Rev. gen. exp. £ool., 4: 82–127.
77. VADEHRA D. V. RBAKER, G. AND NAYLOR N. B. (1970). Role of cuticle in spoilage of chicken eggs.J. Fd Sci., 35: 5–6.
78. VADEHRA D. V. RBAKER, G. AND NAYLOR N. B. (1970). Infection routes of bacteria in chicken eggs.J. FdSci., 35: 61–62.
79. VISSCHEDIJK A. H. J. (1968). The air space and embryonic respiration. 3. The balance between oxygen and carbon dioxide in the air space of the incubating chicken egg and its role in stimulating pipping.Br. Poult. Sci., 9: 197–210.
80. VOETEN A. C. (1965). Control of chronic respiratory disease in chickens by egg dipping in a solution of tylosin tartrate. Ph.D. thesis, University of Utrecht
81. WALDEN C. C., ALLEN I. V. F. AND TRUSSELL P. C. (1956). The role of the egg shell and shell membranes in restraining the entry of microorganisms.Poult. Sci., 35: 1170–1196.
82. WESTON W. A. R. D. AND HALNAN E. T. (1927). “Black spot” of eggs. Poult. Sci., 6: 251–258.
83. WILLIAMS J. E. LDILLARD, H. AND HALL G. O. (1968). The penetration patterns of Salmonella typhimurium through the outer structure of chicken eggs. Avian Dis., 12: 445–466.
84. WILLIAMS J. E. AND WHITTEMORE A. D. (1967). A method for studying microbial penetration through the outer structure of avian eggs.Avian Dis., 11: 467–490.
85. WINTER A. R. BBURKART, CLEMENTS P. AND MACDONALD L. (1955). Cleaning eggs with detergent and detergent sanitizers.Ohio Agric. Exp. Stn Res. Bull., 762.
86. WOLKEN J. J. (1951). Structure of the hen's egg membranes.Anat. Rev., 111: 79–89.
87. ZAGAEVSKY J. S. AND LUTIKOVA P. O. (1944). Sanitary measures in the egg breaking plant.U.S. Egg Poult. Mag., 50: 17–20, 43–46, 75–77, 89–90, 121–124.