The center for expanded data annotation and retrieval

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1148-1152

  Musen, Mark A ^a   Bean, Carol A ^a   Cheung, Kei Hoi ^b   Dumontier, Michel ^a   Durante, Kim A ^c   Gevaert, Olivier ^a   Gonzalez Beltran, Alejandra ^d   Khatri, Purvesh ^a,c   Kleinstein, Steven H ^b   O'Connor, Martin J ^a   Pouliot, Yannick ^a   Rocca Serra, Philippe ^d   Sansone, Susanna Assunta ^d   Wiser, Jeffrey A ^e  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^e NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological ontologies; Data collection; Data curation; Datasets as topic; Standards

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; IMMUNOLOGY; SECONDARY ANALYSIS; BIOLOGICAL ONTOLOGY; DATA MINING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

BIOLOGICAL ONTOLOGIES; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DATA MINING; DATASETS AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84954555114     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv048     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Borgman CL. The conundrum of sharing research data. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol. 2012;63(6):1059-1078.
2. Global Alliance for Genomics & Health. http://genomicsandhealth.org. Accessed March 23, 2015.
3. FORCE11. The future of research communications and e-scholarship. https://www.force11.org. Accessed March 23, 2015.
4. Research Data Alliance: research data sharing without barriers. https://rdalliance.org. Accessed March 23, 2015.
5. Yarmey L, Baker KS. Towards standardization: a participatory framework for scientific standard-making. Int J Digit Curation. 2013;8(1):157-172.
6. Biosharing. http://www.biosharing.org. Accessed March 23, 2015.
7. Sansone S-A, Rocca-Serra P, Field D, et al. Toward interoperable bioscience data. Nat Genet. 2012;44(2):121-126.
8. Tenopir C, Allard S, Douglass K, et al. Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(6):e21101.
9. The Center for Expanded Data Annotation and Retrival. http://metadatacenter.org. Accessed March 22, 2015.
10. Fischer EA. Public access to data from federally funded research: provisions in OMB Circular A-110. Report for Congress R42983. Congressional Research Service. March 1, 2013.
11. Vasilevsky NA, Brush MH, Paddock H, et al. On the reproducibility of science: unique identification of research resources in the biomedical literature. Peer J. 2013;1:e148.
12. How science goes wrong. The Economist, October 19, 2013. http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21588069scientific-research-has-changedworld-now-it-needs-change-itself-how-science-goes-wrong.
13. Tenenbaum JD, Sansone S-A, and Haendel MA. A sea of standards for omics data: sink or swim? JAMIA. 2014;21(2):200-203.
14. Service RF. Biology's dry future. Science. 2013;342(6155):186-189.
15. Margolis R, Derr L, Dunn M, et al. The National Institutes of Health's Big Data to Knowledge (BD2K) initiative: capitalizing on biomedical big data. JAMIA. 2014;21(6):957-958.
16. Musen MA, Noy NF, Shah NH, et al. The National Center for Biomedical Ontology. JAMIA. 2012;19(2):190-195.
17. Greenberg J. Understanding metadata and metadata schemes. Catalog Classification Quart. 2005;40(3/4):17-36.
18. Gene Expression Omnibus. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/. Accessed March 23, 2015.
19. Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J, et al. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data. Nat Genet. 2001;29(4):365-371.
20. Human Immunology Project Consortium. http://www.immuneprofiling.org/hipc/page/show. Accessed March 23, 2015.
21. Rocca-Serra P, Brandizi M, Maquire E, et al. ISA software suite: supporting standards-compliant experimental annotation and enabling curation at the community level. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(18):2354-2356.
22. Brusic V, Gottardo R, Kleinstein SH, et al. Computational resources for highdimensional immune analysis from the Human Immunology Project Consortium. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(2):146-148.
23. Bhattacharya S, Andorf S, Dunn P, et al. ImmPort: disseminating data to the public for the future of immunology. Immunol Res. 2014;58(2-3):234-239.
24. Cramer T, Kott K. Designing and implementing second generation digital preservation services: a scalable model for the Stanford Digital Repository. D-Lib Magazine. 2010;16(9-10). doi:10.1045/september2010-cramer.
25. Greenberg J. Metadata extraction and harvesting: a comparison of two automatic metadata generation applications. J Internet Comput. 2004;6(4):59-82.
26. Chao TC. Mapping methods metadata for research data. Int J Digit Curation. 2015;10(1):82-94.
27. Whetzel T, Noy NF, Shah NH, et al. BioPortal: enhanced functionality via new Web services from the National Center for Biomedical Ontology to access and use ontologies in software applications. Nucleic Acid Res., 2011;39( Web server issue):W541-W545.
28. Edwards PN, Mayernik MS, Batcheller AL, et al. Science friction: data, metadata, and collaboration. Soc Stud Sci. 2011;41(5):667-690.