Judging quality in qualitative dermatology research: The science and the 'art'

British Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 173, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1351-1352

  Nelson, P A ^a   Thompson, A R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DERMATOLOGY; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL BEING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL INTERACTION; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; STANDARDS; UNITED KINGDOM;

DERMATOLOGY; EDITORIAL POLICIES; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84954552892     PISSN: 00070963     EISSN: 13652133     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14256     Document Type: Editorial

References (13)

1. Nelson PA,. Getting under the skin: qualitative methods in dermatology research. Br J Dermatol 2015; 172: 841-3.
2. Harper D, Thompson AR,. Emerging issues and future directions. In: Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy: A Guide for Students and Practitioners (, Harper D, Thompson AR, eds). London: Wiley, 2012; 243-50.
3. Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W,. Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ 2008; 337: a1035.
4. Spencer L, Ritchie J,. In pursuit of quality. In: Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy: A Guide for Students and Practitioners (, Harper D, Thompson AR, eds). London: Wiley, 2012; 225-42.
5. Pope C, Mays N,. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach-an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ 1995; 311: 42-5.
6. Tracy SJ,. Qualitative quality: eight 'big-tent' criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq 2010; 16: 837-51.
7. Dixon-Woods M, Shaw RL, Agarwal S, et al,. The problem of appraising qualitative research. Qual Saf Health Care 2004; 13: 223-5.
8. Elliott R, Fischer CT, Rennie DL,. Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. Br J Clin Psychol 1999; 38: 215-29.
9. Anstey A, Reynolds NJ,. What does the BJD now stand for? A position statement. Br J Dermatol 2015; 172: 1463-5.
10. O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, et al,. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med 2014; 89: 1245-51.
11. Spencer L, Ritchie J, Lewis J, et al,. Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A Framework for Assessing Research Evidence. A Quality Framework. London: Cabinet Office, 2003.
12. Mori H, Nakayama T,. Academic impact of qualitative studies in healthcare: bibliometric analysis. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e57371.
13. Barbour RS,. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ 2001; 322: 1115-17.