-
2
-
-
79959608935
-
Comparison of student performance in paper-based versus computer-based testing
-
Anakwe, B. (2008). Comparison of student performance in paper-based versus computer-based testing. Journal of Education for Business, 84(1), 13-17.
-
(2008)
Journal of Education for Business
, vol.84
, Issue.1
, pp. 13-17
-
-
Anakwe, B.1
-
3
-
-
85006664693
-
Computer-based testing: A comparison of computer-based and paper-And-pencil assessment
-
Brallier, S. A., Maguire, K. A., Palm, L. J., & Smith, D. A. (2010). Computer-based testing: A comparison of computer-based and paper-And-pencil assessment. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 14(4), 117-225.
-
(2011)
Academy of Educational Leadership Journal
, vol.14
, Issue.4
, pp. 117-225
-
-
Brallier, S.A.1
Maguire, K.A.2
Palm, L.J.3
Smith, D.A.4
-
4
-
-
85007880212
-
The equivalence of paper-And-pencil and computer-based testing
-
Bugbee, A. C., Jr. (1996). The equivalence of paper-And-pencil and computer-based testing. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(3), 282-299.
-
(1996)
Journal of Research on Computing in Education
, vol.28
, Issue.3
, pp. 282-299
-
-
Bugbee, A.C.1
-
5
-
-
84874785090
-
Thwarting online exam cheating without proctor supervision
-
July
-
Cluskey, G. R., Jr., Ehlen, C. R., & Raiborn, M. H. (2011). Thwarting online exam cheating without proctor supervision. Journal of Academic and Business Ethics, 4(July), 1.
-
(2011)
Journal of Academic and Business Ethics
, vol.4
, pp. 1
-
-
Cluskey, G.R.1
Ehlen, C.R.2
Raiborn, M.H.3
-
6
-
-
67649367544
-
Are online exams an invitation to cheat?
-
Harmon, O. R., & Lambrinos, J. (2008). Are online exams an invitation to cheat? Journal of Economic Education, 39(2), 116-125.
-
(2008)
Journal of Economic Education
, vol.39
, Issue.2
, pp. 116-125
-
-
Harmon, O.R.1
Lambrinos, J.2
-
7
-
-
84954562420
-
-
Higher Ed Growth, February. Retrieved from
-
Healy, F. (2014). Online degree courses lose momentum. Higher Ed Growth, February. Retrieved from http://www.higheredgrowth.com/online-degree-courses-losemomentum/
-
(2014)
Online Degree Courses Lose Momentum
-
-
Healy, F.1
-
8
-
-
57049162962
-
Academic integrity and distance learning
-
October
-
Lanier, M. M. (2006). Academic integrity and distance learning. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 17(October), 244-261.
-
(2006)
Journal of Criminal Justice Education
, vol.17
, pp. 244-261
-
-
Lanier, M.M.1
-
11
-
-
84922813817
-
Comparisons of proctored versus non-proctored testing strategies in graduate distance education curriculum
-
November
-
Prince, D. J., Fulton, R. A., & Garsombke, T. W. (2009). Comparisons of proctored versus non-proctored testing strategies in graduate distance education curriculum. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 6(November), 51-62.
-
(2009)
Journal of College Teaching and Learning
, vol.6
, pp. 51-62
-
-
Prince, D.J.1
Fulton, R.A.2
Garsombke, T.W.3
-
12
-
-
84954474185
-
-
PRNewswire. January. Retrieved from
-
PRNewswire. (2014). Technology-based online proctoring sharply reduces cheating on college finals. January. Retrieved from http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/technologybased-online-proctoring-sharply-reduces-cheating-on-college-finals-239058501.html
-
(2014)
Technology-based Online Proctoring Sharply Reduces Cheating on College Finals
-
-
-
13
-
-
0242432294
-
Assessing the effectiveness of interactive television instruction in an upper division accounting course
-
Rudolph, H. R., Seay, R. A., & Milkman, M. I. (2000). Assessing the effectiveness of interactive television instruction in an upper division accounting course. Advances in Accounting Education, 3, 151-168.
-
(2000)
Advances in Accounting Education
, vol.3
, pp. 151-168
-
-
Rudolph, H.R.1
Seay, R.A.2
Milkman, M.I.3
-
14
-
-
84954521078
-
An evaluation of examination results between students in management courses being video monitored verses those in a traditionally monitored environment
-
Schultz, M. C., Shultz, J. T., & Schultz, J. J. (2012). An evaluation of examination results between students in management courses being video monitored verses those in a traditionally monitored environment. The Business Review, Cambridge, 20, 76-82.
-
(2012)
The Business Review, Cambridge
, vol.20
, pp. 76-82
-
-
Schultz, M.C.1
Shultz, J.T.2
Schultz, J.J.3
-
15
-
-
0003033158
-
Interactive television instruction: An assessment of student performance and attitudes in an upper division accounting course
-
Seay, R. A., & Milkman, M. I. (1994). Interactive television instruction: An assessment of student performance and attitudes in an upper division accounting course. Issues in Accounting Education, 9(1), 80-95.
-
(1994)
Issues in Accounting Education
, vol.9
, Issue.1
, pp. 80-95
-
-
Seay, R.A.1
Milkman, M.I.2
-
16
-
-
84954558146
-
Students perception of academic integrity in online business education courses
-
Swartz, L. B., & Cole, M. T. (2013). Students perception of academic integrity in online business education courses. Journal of Business and Educational Leadership, 4(1), 102-112.
-
(2013)
Journal of Business and Educational Leadership
, vol.4
, Issue.1
, pp. 102-112
-
-
Swartz, L.B.1
Cole, M.T.2
-
18
-
-
84860538477
-
Cheating in the digital age Do student cheat more in online courses?
-
Retrieved from
-
Watson, G., & Sottile, J. (2010). Cheating in the digital age: Do student cheat more in online courses? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(1). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring131/watson131.html
-
(2011)
Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration
, vol.13
, pp. 1
-
-
Watson, G.1
Sottile, J.2
-
19
-
-
84954518023
-
Student perceptions of cheating in online business courses
-
Watters, M. P., Robertson, P. J., & Clark, R. K. (2011). Student perceptions of cheating in online business courses. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 6, 1-14.
-
(2011)
Journal of Instructional Pedagogies
, vol.6
, pp. 1-14
-
-
Watters, M.P.1
Robertson, P.J.2
Clark, R.K.3
|