Evaluation of Dimensionality in the Assessment of Internal Consistency Reliability: Coefficient Alpha and Omega Coefficients

Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 14-20

  Green, Samuel B ^a   Yang, Yanyun ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Coefficient ; Internal consistency; Reliability; Unidimensionality; Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954455259     PISSN: 07311745     EISSN: 17453992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/emip.12100     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bados, A., Gómez-Benito, J., & Balaguer, G. (2010). The state-trait anxiety inventory, trait version: Does it really measure anxiety? Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 560-567.
2. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98-104.
3. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
4. Davenport, E. C., Davison, M. L., Liou, P.-Y., & Love, Q. U. (2015). Reliability, dimensionality, and internal consistency as defined by Cronbach: Distinct albeit related concepts. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34, 1-6.
5. Farias, S. T., Mungas, D., Reed, B. R., Cahn-Weiner, D., Jagust, W., Baynes, K., & DeCarli, C. (2008). The measurement of everyday cognition (ECog): Scale development and psychometric properties. Neuropsychology, 22, 531-544.
6. Feldt, L. S., & Qualls, A. L. (1996). Bias in coefficient alpha arising from heterogeneity. Applied Measurement in Education, 9, 277-286.
7. Forero, C. G., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Gallardo-Pujol, D. (2009). Factor analysis with ordinal indicators: A Monte Carlo study comparing DWLS and ULS estimation. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 625-641.
8. Gessaroli, M. E., & Folske, J. C. (2002). Generalizing the reliability of tests comprised of testlets. International Journal of Testing, 2(3-4), 277-295.
9. Gignac, G. E., Palmer, B. R., & Stough, C. (2007). A confirmatory factor analytic investigation of the TAS-20: Corroboration of a five-factor model and suggestions for improvement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 247-257.
10. Gignac, G. E., & Watkins, M. W. (2013). Bifactor modeling and the estimation of model-based reliability in the WAIS-IV. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48, 639-662.
11. Green, S. B., & Hershberger, S. L. (2000). Correlated errors in true score models and their effect on coefficient alpha. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 251-270.
12. Green, S. B., Lissitz, R. W., & Mulaik, S. (1977). Limitations of coefficient alpha as an index of text unidimensionality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 827-839.
13. Green, S. B., & Yang, Y. (2005, April). K-Split coefficient alpha. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
14. Green, S. B., & Yang, Y. (2009a). Commentary on coefficient alpha: A cautionary tale. Psychometrika, 74, 121-135.
15. Green, S. B., & Yang, Y. (2009b). Reliability of summed item scores using structural equation modeling: An alternative to coefficient alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 155-167.
16. Green, S. B., Yang, Y., Alt, M., Brinkley, S., Gray, S, Hogan, T., & Cowan, N., (in press). Use of internal consistency coefficients for estimating reliability of experimental task scores. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
17. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Miller, M. B. (1995). Coefficient alpha: A basic introduction from the perspectives of classical test theory and structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 255-273.
19. Patrick, C. J., Hicks, B. M., Nichol, P. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2007). A bifactor approach to modeling the structure of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 118-141.
20. Raykov, T. (1997). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 173-184.
21. Reise, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667-696.
22. Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. E., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354-373.
23. Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, 350-353.
24. Sijtsma, K. (2009). The use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach's alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107-120.
25. Thomas, M. L. (2012). Rewards of bridging the divide between measurement and clinical theory: Demonstration of a bifactor model for the Brief Symptom Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 24, 101-113.
26. Zhang, J., & Stout, W. (1999). The theoretical DETECT index of dimensionality and its application to approximate simple structure. Psychometrika, 64, 213-249.
27. Zimmerman, D. W., Zumbo, B. D., & Lalonde, C. (1993). Coefficient alpha as an estimate of test reliability under violation of two assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 33-49.
28. H: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70, 123-133.