From data quality to big data quality

Journal of Database Management

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 60-82

  Batini, Carlo ^a   Rula, Anisa ^c   Scannapieco, Monica ^b   Viscusi, Gianluigi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^b ITALIAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STATISTICS   (Italy)

^c EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Big Data; Big Data Quality; Data Quality; Linked Open Data; Maps; Semi Structured Texts

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; MAPS; SEMANTIC WEB; SENSOR NETWORKS;

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; DATA QUALITY; LINKED OPEN DATUM; LITERATURE REVIEWS; OFFICIAL STATISTICS; RELATIONAL DATABASE; SEMI-STRUCTURED TEXT; STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS;

BIG DATA;

EID: 84954422293     PISSN: 10638016     EISSN: 15338010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/JDM.2015010103     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. W3C (2000, November 6), HTML Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-HTML-TECHS/
2. W3C-WAI (2015, March 19). Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) -Guidelines and Techniques. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/WAI/guid-tech.html
3. Bailey, K. D. (1994). Typologies and taxonomies -An Introduction to Classification Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
4. Batini, C., Palmonari, M., &Viscusi, G. (2012) The many faces of information and their impact on information quality. In L.B. Equille, I. Comyn-Wattiau, &M. Scannapieco (Eds.), Proc. 17th International Conference on Information Quality -ICIQ 2012 (pp. 212-228).
5. Batini, C., &Scannapieco, M. (2006). Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
6. Bauer, F., &Kaltenbock, M. (2012). Linked Open Data: The Essentials -A Quick Start Guide for Decision Makers. Vienna, Austria.
7. Berners-Lee. Tim. (2006, July 27) Linked Data -Design Issues. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
8. Beyea, S. C., &Nicoll, L. H. (2015). Writing an integrative review. [PubMed]. AORN Journal, 67(4), 877-880. doi:10.1016/S0001-2092(06)62653-7 PMID:9616108
9. Boell, S. K., &Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2014). A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34(1), 257-286.
10. Buelens, B., Daas, P., Burger, J., Puts, M., &Van den Brakel, J. (2014, March 28). Selectivity of Big Data. Retrieved from http://www.pietdaas.nl/beta/pubs/pubs/Selectivity-Buelens.pdf
11. Carroll, J. J. (2003). Signing RDF Graphs. In D. Fensel (Ed.), ISWC 2003, LNCS 2870 (pp. 369-384). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
12. Chee, C.-H., William, Y., Shijia, G., &Richards, G. (2014). Improving Business Intelligence Traceability and Accountability. Journal of Database Management, 25(3), 28-47. doi:10.4018/jdm.2014070102
13. DGNIS. (2013, September 27). Scheveningen Memorandum -Big Data and Official Statistics. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/42577/43315/Scheveningen-memorandum-27-09-13
14. DuBay, W. H. (2004, August 25). The principles of readability. Retrieved from www.impact-information.com/impactinfo/readability02.pdf
15. Dumbill, E. (2013). Making Sense of Big Data [Editorial]. Big Data, 1(1), 1-2. doi:10.1089/big.2012.1503
16. Elmasri, R., &Navathe, B. S. (2001). Fundamentals of database systems. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
17. Elson, J., &Romer, K. (2003). Wireless sensor networks: A new regime for time synchronization. Computer Communication Review, 33(1), 149-154. doi:10.1145/774763.774787
18. Fonseca, F., Davis, C., &Camara, G. (2003). Bridging Ontologies and Conceptual Schemas in Geographic Information Integration. GeoInformatica, 7(4), 355-378. doi:10.1023/A:1025573406389
19. Gallegos, I., Gates, A., &Tweedie, C. (2010, November 1-4). DaProS: A data property specification tool to capture scientific sensor data properties. In J. Trujillo, G. Dobbie, H. Kangassalo, S. Hartmann, M. Kirchberg, M. Rossi, I. Reinhartz-Berger, E. Zimanyi, F. Frasincar, (Eds.), Advances in Conceptual Modeling -Applications and Challenges -Proceedings of ER 2010 Workshops ACM-L, CMLSA, CMS, DE@ER, FP-UML, SeCoGIS, WISM, Vancouver, BC, Canada, LNCS Volume 6413 (pp. 232-241). Berlin /Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16385-2-29
20. Guptill, S. C. (1995). Temporal information. In S. C. Guptill &J.L. Morrison (Eds.), Elements of Spatial Data Quality (pp. 153-165). International Cartographic Association. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-042432-3.50015-X
21. Heath, T., &Bizer, C. (2011). Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space (1st ed.). San Rafael, Ca: Morgan &Claypool.
22. Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; doi:10.1017/CBO9781139524841
23. Kozak, S., Novak, D., &Zezula, P. (2014). Privacy-Preserving Outsourced Similarity Search. Journal of Database Management, 25(3), 48-71. doi:10.4018/jdm.2014070103
24. Open Data Handbook. (2015, October 1). What is Open Data? Retrieved from http://opendatahandbook.org/en/what-is-open-data/
25. Redman, T. (1996). Data Quality for the Information Age. Norwood: Artech House.
26. Rose, E. (1991). Data Modeling for Non-Standard Data. Journal of Database Management, 2(3), 8-21. doi:10.4018/jdm.1991070102
27. Sha, K., &Shi, W. (2008). Consistency-driven data quality management of networked sensor systems. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 68(9), 1207-1221. doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2008.06.004
28. Shekhar, S. &Xiong. (Eds.), (2008). Encyclopedia of GIS. Berlin /Heidelberg: Springer.
29. Shi, W., Fisher, P., &Goodchild, M. F. (Eds.). (2003). Spatial data quality. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
30. Shick, P. L. (2007). Topology: Point set and geometric. New York: Wiley &Sons; doi:10.1002/9781118031582
31. Strong, D. M., Lee, Y. W., &Wang, R. Y. (1997). Data Quality in Context. Communications of the ACM, 40(5), 103-110. doi:10.1145/253769.253804
32. Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., &Sorensen, C. (2010). Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 748-759.
33. Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356-367. doi:10.1177/1534484305278283
34. UNECE. (2013, March 11). What does Big data mean for official statistics? Retrieved from http://www1.unece.org/stat/platform/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=77170622
35. United Nations Statistics Division. (1994, April 11-15). Fundamental Principles of National Official Statistics. Retrieved from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/dnss/gp/fp-english.pdf
36. Viscusi, G., Batini, C., &Mecella, M. (2010). Information Systems for eGovernment: A Quality-of-Service Perspective. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
37. Wallis, J. C., Borgman, C., Mayernik, M., Pepe, A., Ramanathan, N., &Hansen, M. (2007). Know Thy Sensor: Trust, Data Quality, and Data Integrity in Scientific Digital Libraries. In L. Kovacs, N. Fuhr, &C. Meghini (Eds.), 11th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries September 16-21, LNCS Volume 4675 (pp. 380-391). Berlin /Heidelberg: Springer.
38. Wand, Y., &Wang, R. Y. (1996). Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. Communications of the ACM, 39(11), 86-95.
39. Wang, R. Y., Storey, V. C., &Firth, C. P. (1995). A Framework for Analysis of Data Quality Research. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 7(4).
40. Webster, J., &Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 26(2), XIII-XXIII.
41. Whittemore, R., &Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546-553. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x PMID:16268861
42. Zaveri, A., Rula, A., Maurino, A., Pietrobon, R., Lehmann, J., &Soren, A. (forthcoming, 2016). Quality assessment for Linked Data: A survey. Semantic Web Journal, 7(1), 1-32. Retrieved from http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/quality-Assessment-linked-data-survey