The impact of school nonresponse on substance use prevalence estimates - Germany as a case study

International Journal of Drug Policy

Volumn 27, Issue , 2016, Pages 164-172

  Thrul, Johannes ^a   Pabst, Alexander ^b,c   Kraus, Ludwig ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b IFT INSTITUT FÜR THERAPIEFORSCHUNG   (Germany)

^c INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^d STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Nonresponse; Prevalence estimation; School; Simulation; Substance use; Survey research

Indexed keywords

STREET DRUG;

ADOLESCENT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMAN; MALE; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; PREVALENCE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCHOOL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; STUDENT; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

ADOLESCENT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; PREVALENCE; SCHOOLS; STREET DRUGS; STUDENTS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84954391564     PISSN: 09553959     EISSN: 18734758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bellis M.A., Hughes K., Morleo M., Tocque K., Hughes S., Allen T., et al. Predictors of risky alcohol consumption in schoolchildren and their implications for preventing alcohol-related harm. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2007, 2(1):15. 10.1186/1747-597X-2-15.
2. Cochran W.G. Sampling techniques 1977, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 3rd ed.
3. Evans-Whipp T.J., Plenty S.M., Catalano R.F., Herrenkohl T.I., Toumbourou J.W. The impact of school alcohol policy on student drinking. Health Education Research 2013, 28(4):651-662. 10.1093/her/cyt068.
4. Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A.-G., Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 2007, 39(2):175-191. 10.3758/BF03193146.
5. Fite P.J., Wynn P., Lochman J.E., Wells K.C. The influence of neighborhood disadvantage and perceived disapproval on early substance use initiation. Addictive Behaviors 2009, 34(9):769-771. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.05.002.
6. Galea S., Nandi A., Vlahov D. The social epidemiology of substance use. Epidemiologic Reviews 2004, 26(1):36-52. 10.1093/epirev/mxh007.
7. Galea S., Tracy M. Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Annals of Epidemiology 2007, 17(9):643-653. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.03.013.
8. Gerrits M.H., Van Den Oord E.J.C.G., Voogt R. An evaluation of nonresponse bias in peer, self, and teacher ratings of children's psychosocial adjustment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2001, 42(5):593-602. 10.1111/1469-7610.00755.
9. Gmel G., Rehm J. Measuring alcohol consumption. Contemporary Drug Problems 2004, 31(3):467-540.
10. Groves R.M., Peytcheva E. The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias a meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly 2008, 72(2):167-189. 10.1093/poq/nfn011.
11. Hawkins J., Catalano R., Miller J.Y. Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin 1992, 112(1):64-105. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.64.
12. Hibell B., Andersson B., Bjarnason T., Ahlström S., Balakireva O., Kokkevi A., et al. The ESPAD report 2003. Alcohol and other drug use among students in 35 European countries 2004, The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and other Drugs (CAN), Stockholm, Retrieved from http://www.espad.org/en/Reports--Documents/ESPAD-Reports/.
13. Hibell B., Guttormsson U., Ahlström S., Balakireva O., Bjarnason T., Kokkevi A., et al. The 2007 ESPAD report. Substance use among students in 35 European countries 2009, The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and other Drugs (CAN), Stockholm, Retrieved from http://www.espad.org/en/Reports--Documents/ESPAD-Reports/.
14. Hibell B., Guttormsson U., Ahlström S., Balakireva O., Bjarnason T., Kokkevi A., et al. The 2011 ESPAD report. Substance use among students in 36 European countries 2012, The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and other Drugs (CAN), Stockholm, Retrieved from http://www.espad.org/en/Reports--Documents/ESPAD-Reports/.
15. Kano M., Franke T., Afifi A.A., Bourque L.B. Adequacy of reporting results of school surveys and nonresponse effects: A review of the literature and a case study. Educational Researcher 2008, 37(8):480-490. 10.3102/0013189X08326859.
16. Keeter S., Miller C., Kohut A., Groves R.M., Presser S. Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly 2000, 64(2):125-148. 10.1086/317759.
17. Kraus L., Pabst A., Steiner S. Europäische Schülerstudie zu Alkohol und anderen Drogen 2007 (ESPAD): Befragung von Schülerinnen und Schülern der 9. und 10. Klasse in Bayern, Berlin, Brandenburg, Hessen, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Saarland und Thüringen 2008, IFT Institut für Therapieforschung, München, Retrieved from http://www.ift.de/index.php?id=344.
18. Kypri K., Stephenson S., Langley J. Assessment of nonresponse bias in an internet survey of alcohol use. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 2004, 28(4):630-634. 10.1097/01.ALC.0000121654.99277.26.
19. Lahaut V.M.H.C.J., Jansen H.A.M., Mheen D., van de Garretsen H.F.L. Non-response bias in a sample survey on alcohol consumption. Alcohol and Alcoholism 2002, 37(3):256-260. 10.1093/alcalc/37.3.256.
20. Lahaut V.M.H.C.J., Jansen H.A.M., Mheen D., van de Garretsen H.F.L., Verdurmen J.E.E., van Dijk A. Estimating non-response bias in a survey on alcohol consumption: Comparison of response waves. Alcohol and Alcoholism 2003, 38(2):128-134. 10.1093/alcalc/agg044.
21. Lampert T., Thamm M. Tabak-, Alkohol- und Drogenkonsum von Jugendlichen in Deutschland. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 2007, 50(5):600-608. 10.1007/s00103-007-0221-y.
22. Ousey G.C., Maume M.O. The grass is always greener: Explaining rural and urban differences in marijuana use. Sociological Focus 1997, 30(3):295-305. 10.1080/00380237.1997.10571080.
23. Piontek D., Bühler A., Kröger C. Schulische Tabakprävention. Zur Wirksamkeit verhältnispräventiver Maßnahmen gegen das Rauchen von Jugendlichen. Prävention Und Gesundheitsförderung 2007, 2(2):129-135. 10.1007/s11553-007-0054-4.
24. Shahar E., Folsom A.R., Jackson R., The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators The effect of nonresponse on prevalence estimates for a referent population: Insights from a population-based cohort study. Annals of Epidemiology 1996, 6(6):498-506. 10.1016/S1047-2797(96)00104-4.
25. Simons-Morton B. Social influences adolescent substance use. American Journal of Health Behavior 2007, 31(6):672-684. 10.5555/ajhb.2007.31.6.672.
26. Statistisches Bundesamt Bevölkerung und Erwerbstätigkeit: Ausländische Bevölkerung - Ergebnisse des Ausländerzentralregisters 2013 2014, Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden, Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/Bevoelkerung/MigrationIntegration/AuslaendBevoelkerung.html.
27. Tretter F., Kraus L. Stadtspezifische Prävalenz des Drogenkonsums und ihre UrsachenStadtspezifische Prävalenz des Drogenkonsums und ihre Ursachen. Sucht 2004, 50(1):5-7.
28. Winstanley E.L., Steinwachs D.M., Ensminger M.E., Latkin C.A., Stitzer M.L., Olsen Y. The association of self-reported neighborhood disorganization and social capital with adolescent alcohol and drug use, dependence, and access to treatment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2008, 92(1-3):173-182. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.07.012.
29. Zhao J., Stockwell T., Macdonald S. Non-response bias in alcohol and drug population surveys. Drug and Alcohol Review 2009, 28(6):648-657. 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00077.x.