Assessment and learning technologies: An overview

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 106-120

  Farrell, Treasa ^a   Rushby, Nick ^b  

^a Examinations and Assessment in Northern Ireland   (United Kingdom)

^b British Journal of Educational Technology   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY;

CATALYSE; FORMATIVE AND SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENTS; INDIVIDUAL LEARNING; INTERNATIONAL SCALE; LEARNING PROCESS; LEARNING TECHNOLOGY;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 84954376103     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12348     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Ahlawat, V., Pareek, A., &, Singh, S. K., (2014). Online invigilation: a holistic approach: process for automated online invigilation. International Journal of Computer Applications, 90, 17, 31-35.
2. Barrett, H., &, Carney, J., (2005). Conflicting paradigms and competing purposes in electronic portfolio development. Retrieved December 18, 2009, from http://electronicportfolios.org/portfolios/LEAJournal-BarrettCarney.pdf.
3. Barrett, H. C., (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: the REFLECT initiative. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50, 436-449. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.50.6.2.
4. Brown, J. S., &, Burton, R. R., (1978). Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills. Cognitive Science, 2, 155-191.
5. Burton, R. R., (1982). Diagnosing bugs in a simple procedural skill. In, D. H. Sleeman, &, J. S. Brown, (Eds), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 157-182). London: Academic Press.
6. Clark, A., Fox, C., &, Lappin, S., (Eds) (2012). The handbook of computational linguistics and natural language processing. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN-10: 1118347188.
7. Clarke, N. L., Dowland, P., &, Furnell, S. M., (2013). e-invigilator: a biometric-based supervision system for e-assessments. International Conference on Information Society (i-Society). IEEE. pp. 238-242.
8. Collobert, R., Weston, J., Bottou, L., Karlen, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., &, Kuksa, P., (2011). Natural language processing (almost) from scratch. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2493-2537.
9. Copeland, M., (2005). Socratic circles: fostering critical and creative thinking in middle and high school. Portland, Maine: Stenhouse Publishers. ISBN-10: 1571103945.
10. Ferguson, R., (2012). Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4, 5/6, 304-317.
11. Ferrell, G., &, Gray, L., (2014). Guide to the Electronic Management of Assessment. Bristol, UK: JISC. Retrieved November 3, 2014, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/electronic-assessment-management
12. Garcia, E., Elbeltagi, I., Brown, M., &, Dungay, K., (2014). The implications of a connectivist learning blog model and the changing role of teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 4, 877-894.
13. Horowitz, M. J., (1962). Trends in education (report on the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association held on February 19-21, 1962). Journal of Medical Education, 37, 790-793.
14. Hubbard, D. W., (2010). How to measure anything: finding the value of "intangibles" in business. Malden, MA: Wiley.
15. Jackson, P., &, Moulinier, I., (2007). Natural language processing for online applications: Text retrieval, extraction and categorization Vol. 5. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing.
16. Jordan, S., &, Mitchell, T., (2009). e-Assessment for learning? The potential of short-answer free-text questions with tailored feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 371-385. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00928.x.
17. Lai, Y.-H., (2010). Which do students prefer to evaluate their essays: peers or computer program. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 432-454. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00959.x.
18. Lefevre, D., &, Cox, B., (2014). Feedback in technology based instruction: learner preferences. British Journal of Educational Technology. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12227.
19. National Endowment for Science Technology and the Arts (NESTA) (2009). The wider conditions for innovation in the UK: How the UK compares to leading innovation nations. Retrieved October 27, 2014, from http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/wider-conditions-innovation-uk
20. OECD, PISA (2009). Assessment framework: key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved July 29, 2015, from www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/44455820.pdf.
21. Puentedura, R., (2009). SAMR: a contextualised introduction. Retrieved October 5, 2014, from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/01/15/SAMRABriefContextualizedIntroduction.pdf
22. Rushby, N. J., (1996). Assistants for assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 33, 3, 154-161.
23. Skurnik, L. S., &, Nuttall, D. L., (1987). Examination and item analysis manual. Nottingham, UK: University of Nottingham. ISBN-10: 0853591334.
24. Stefani, L., Mason, R., &, Pegler, C., (2007). The educational potential of e-portfolios. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-41214-8.
25. Tisi, J., Whitehouse, G., Maughan, S., &, Burdett, N., (2013). A review of literature on marking reliability research (Report for Ofqual). Slough: NFER.
26. Tucker, B., (2009). Beyond the bubble: Technology and the Future of Student Assessment, Education Sector at American Institutes for Research. Retrieved October 31, 2014, from http://www.educationsector.org/publications/beyond-bubble-technology-and-future-student-assessment
27. Tzeng, J.-Y., &, Chen, S.-H., (2012). College students' intentions to use e-portfolios: From the perspectives of career-commitment status and weblog-publication behaviours. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 163-176. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01165.x.
28. UK Commission for Employment and Skills (2014). National Occupational Standards. Retrieved October 24, 2014, from http://nos.ukces.org.uk/Pages/index.aspx
29. Weisschuh, J., (2012). Proposal-Guiding principles for investors to transform education for the 21st century, Global Economic Symposium. Retrieved July 15, 2015, from http://www.global-economic-symposium.org/knowledgebase/the-global-economy/effective-investments-in-education/proposals/guiding-principles-for-investors-to-transform-education-for-the-21st-century
30. Whitelock, D. M., Mackenzie, D., Whitehouse, C., Ruedel, C., &, Rae, S., (2006). Identifying innovative and effective practice in e-assessment: findings from seventeen UK case studies. In, M. Danson, (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th CAA international computer assisted assessment conference (pp. 505-511). Loughborough, UK: Professional Development, Loughborough University.