-
1
-
-
84860291865
-
Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature
-
De Oliveira, G. S, Jr, Chang, R., Kendall, M. C., Fitzgerald, P. C., & McCarthy, R. J. (2012). Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature. Anesthesia and Analgesia,114(5), 1042–1048. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182468fc6.
-
(2012)
Anesthesia and Analgesia
, vol.114
, Issue.5
, pp. 1042-1048
-
-
De Oliveira, G.S.1
Chang, R.2
Kendall, M.C.3
Fitzgerald, P.C.4
McCarthy, R.J.5
-
2
-
-
69349099139
-
Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results
-
Hopewell, S., Loudon, K., Clarke, M. J., Oxman, A. D., & Dickersin, K. (2009). Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. Cochrane Database Systematic Review,1, MR000006. doi:10.1002/14651858.MR000006.pub3.
-
(2009)
Cochrane Database Systematic Review
, vol.1
, pp. MR000006
-
-
Hopewell, S.1
Loudon, K.2
Clarke, M.J.3
Oxman, A.D.4
Dickersin, K.5
-
3
-
-
56749181456
-
Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science
-
Jones, B. F., Wuchty, S., & Uzzi, B. (2008). Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science,322(5905), 1259–1262. doi:10.1126/science.1158357.
-
(2008)
Science
, vol.322
, Issue.5905
, pp. 1259-1262
-
-
Jones, B.F.1
Wuchty, S.2
Uzzi, B.3
-
4
-
-
33745462768
-
Predictors of publication: Characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals
-
Lee, K. P., Boyd, E. A., Holroyd-Leduc, J. M., Bacchetti, P., & Bero, L. A. (2006). Predictors of publication: Characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals. Medical Journal of Australia,184(12), 621–626.
-
(2006)
Medical Journal of Australia
, vol.184
, Issue.12
, pp. 621-626
-
-
Lee, K.P.1
Boyd, E.A.2
Holroyd-Leduc, J.M.3
Bacchetti, P.4
Bero, L.A.5
-
5
-
-
84928291583
-
Corresponding authors: Is there fame bias in editorial choice?
-
Mahian, O. (2015). Corresponding authors: Is there fame bias in editorial choice? Nature,519(7544), 414. doi:10.1038/519414d.
-
(2015)
Nature
, vol.519
, Issue.7544
, pp. 414
-
-
Mahian, O.1
-
6
-
-
69849092717
-
Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials
-
Mathieu, S., Boutron, I., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., & Ravaud, P. (2009). Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA,302(9), 977–984. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1242.
-
(2009)
JAMA
, vol.302
, Issue.9
, pp. 977-984
-
-
Mathieu, S.1
Boutron, I.2
Moher, D.3
Altman, D.G.4
Ravaud, P.5
-
7
-
-
84947128138
-
Is there bias in editorial choice? Yes
-
Moustafa, K. (2015). Is there bias in editorial choice? Yes. Scientometrics,. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1617-3.
-
(2015)
Scientometrics
-
-
Moustafa, K.1
-
8
-
-
0037024222
-
Publication bias in editorial decision making
-
Olson, C. M., Rennie, D., Cook, D., Dickersin, K., Flanagin, A., Hogan, J. W., et al. (2002). Publication bias in editorial decision making. JAMA,287(21), 2825–2828.
-
(2002)
JAMA
, vol.287
, Issue.21
, pp. 2825-2828
-
-
Olson, C.M.1
Rennie, D.2
Cook, D.3
Dickersin, K.4
Flanagin, A.5
Hogan, J.W.6
-
9
-
-
84905836758
-
Role of editorial and peer review processes in publication bias: Analysis of drug trials submitted to eight medical journals
-
van Lent, M., Overbeke, J., & Out, H. J. (2014). Role of editorial and peer review processes in publication bias: Analysis of drug trials submitted to eight medical journals. PLoS One,9(8), e104846. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104846.
-
(2014)
PLoS One
, vol.9
, Issue.8
, pp. e104846
-
-
van Lent, M.1
Overbeke, J.2
Out, H.J.3
|