Fabrication and assessment of 3D printed anatomical models of the lower limb for anatomical teaching and femoral vessel access training in medicine

Anatomical Sciences Education

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 71-79

  O'Reilly, Michael K ^a   Reese, Sven ^b   Herlihy, Therese ^a   Geoghegan, Tony ^c   Cantwell, Colin P ^d   Feeney, Robin N M ^a   Jones, James F X ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c MATER MISERICORDIAE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

^d ST VINCENT S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

Author keywords

3D imaging techniques; 3D printing; Anatomical sciences; Digital anatomy; Gross anatomy education; Low fidelity simulation models; Radiology education; Rapid prototyping; Residency training; Ultrasound simulation

Indexed keywords

ANATOMIC MODEL; ANATOMY; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; EDUCATION; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMAN; LOWER LIMB; SURGERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING;

ANATOMY; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMANS; LOWER EXTREMITY; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PRINTING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 84954362273     PISSN: 19359772     EISSN: 19359780     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ase.1538     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Agache PG, Monneur C, Leveque JL, De Rigal J 1980. Mechanical properties and Young's modulus of human skin in vivo. Arch Dermatol Res 269:221-232.
2. Akkus O, Oguz A, Uzunlulu M, Kizilgul M 2012. Evaluation of skin and subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness for optimal insulin injection. J Diabetes Metabol 3:216.
3. American Chemical Society. 2006. Reagent Chemicals: Specifications and Procedures. 10th Ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc. p 816.
4. ©/Anatomography. The Database Center for Life Science. Tokyo, Japan: Life Science DB. URL: http://lifesciencedb.jp/bp3d/ [accessed February 28, 2015].
5. Cheung CL, Looi T, Lendvay TS, Drake JM, Farhat WA. 2014. Use of 3-dimensional printing technology and silicone modeling in surgical simulation: Development and face validation in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Surg Educ 71:762-767.
6. Costello JP, Olivieri LJ, Krieger A, Thabit O, Marshall MB, Yoo SJ, Kim PC, Jonas RA, Nath DS. 2014. Utilizing three-dimensional printing technology to assess the feasibility of high-fidelity synthetic ventricular septal defect models for simulation in medical education. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 5:421-426.
7. Costello JP, Olivieri LJ, Su L, Krieger A, Alfares F, Thabit O, Marshall MB, Yoo SJ, Kim PC, Jonas RA, Nath DS. 2015. Incorporating three-dimensional printing into a simulation-based congenital heart disease and critical care training curriculum for resident physicians. Congenit Heart Dis 10:185-190.
8. Dong Y, Suri HS, Cook DA, Kashani KB, Mullon JJ, Enders FT, Rubin O, Ziv A, Dunn WF 2010. Simulation-based objective assessment discerns clinical proficiency in central line placement: A construct validation. Chest 137:1050-1056.
9. Dugo M, Brisotto E, Pasi A, Mangino M, Puggia R, Gatti P, Brunello A, Virgilio B, Caberlotto A, Zagatti R, Toffolo K, Palminteri G, Rizzolo M, Mastrosimone S, Maresca MC. 2014. Ultrasound-guided renal biopsy: Evaluation of different models of biological simulator. G Ital Nefrol 31:4.
10. Gerstenmaier JF, McCarthy CJ, Brophy DP, Cantwell CP. 2013. Evaluation of the particulate concentration in a gelatin-based phantom for sonographically guided lesion biopsy. J Ultrasound Med 32:1471-1475.
11. Gerstle TL, Ibrahim AM, Kim PS, Lee BT, Lin SJ. 2014. A plastic surgery application in evolution: Three-dimensional printing. Plast Reconstr Surg 133:446-451.
12. Groarke PJ, Kelly JC, Flanagan E, Stephens MM. 2015. The forgotten foot - An assessment of foot and ankle radiograph pathology in final year medical students. Surgeon (in press; doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2014.03.011).
13. Groth C, Kravitz ND, Jones PE, Graham JW, Redmond WR. 2014. Three-dimensional printing technology. J Clin Orthod 48:475-485.
14. Hall MK, Mirjalili SA, Moore CL, Rizzolo LJ. 2015. The student's dilemma, liver edition: Incorporating the sonographer's language into clinical anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ 8:283-288.
15. Johnson SJ, Hunt CM, Woolnough HM, Crawshaw M, Kilkenny C, Gould DA, England A, Sinha A, Villard PF 2012. Virtual reality, ultrasound-guided liver biopsy simulator: Development and performance discrimination. Br J Radiol 85:555-561.
16. Khan IS, Kelly PD, Singer RJ 2014. Prototyping of cerebral vasculature physical models. Surg Neurol Int 5:11.
17. Li J, Nie L, Li Z, Lin L, Tang L, Ouyang J. 2012. Maximizing modern distribution of complex anatomical spatial information: 3D reconstruction and rapid prototype production of anatomical corrosion casts of human specimens. Anat Sci Educ 5:330-339.
18. McGaghie WC, Draycott TJ, Dunn WF, Lopez CM, Stefanidis D 2011. Evaluating the impact of simulation on translational patient outcomes. Simul Healthc 6:S42-S47.
19. McMenamin PG, Quayle MR, McHenry CR, Adams JW. 2014. The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anat Sci Educ 7:479-486.
20. Miller SF, Sanz-Guerrero J, Dodde RE, Johnson DD, Bhawuk A, Gurm HS, Shih AJ. 2013. A pulsatile blood vessel system for a femoral arterial access clinical simulation model. Med Eng Phys 35:1518-1524.
21. Mitsuhashi N, Fujieda K, Tamura T, Kawamoto S, Takagi T, Okubo K. 2009. BodyParts3D: 3D structure database for anatomical concepts. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D782-D785.
22. Mix AW, Giacomin AJ 2011. Standardized polymer durometry. J Test Eval 39:696-705.
23. Moscova M, Bryce DA, Sindhusake D, Young N. 2015. Integration of medical imaging including ultrasound into a new clinical anatomy curriculum. Anat Sci Educ (in press; doi: 10.1002/ase.1481).
24. Motoike HK, O'Kane RL, Lenchner E, Haspel C. 2009. Clay modeling as a method to learn human muscles: A community college study. Anat Sci Educ 2:19-23.
25. Petrinec K, Savitsky E, Hein C. 2011. Patient-specific cases for an ultrasound training simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform 163:447-453.
26. Preece D, Williams SB, Lam R, Weller R. 2013. "Let's get physical": Advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 6:216-224.
27. Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Zechmann CM, Unterhinninghofen R, Kauczor HU, Giesel FL. 2010. 3D printing based on imaging data: Review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5:335-341.
28. Roche ET, Wohlfarth R, Overvelde JT, Vasilyev NV, Pigula FA, Mooney DJ, Bertoldi K, Walsh CJ. 2014. A bioinspired soft actuated material. Adv Mater 26:1200-1206.
29. Rose AS, Kimbell JS, Webster CE, Harrysson OL, Formeister EJ, Buchman CA. 2015. Multi-material 3D models for temporal bone surgical simulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (in press; doi: 10.1177/0003489415570937).
30. Seto AH, Abu-Fadel MS, Sparling JM, Zacharias SJ, Daly TS, Harrison AT, Suh WM, Vera JA, Aston CE, Winters RJ, Patel PM, Hennebry TA, Kern MJ. 2010. Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates femoral arterial access and reduces vascular complications: FAUST (femoral arterial access with ultrasound trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3:751-758.
31. Torres K, Staśkiewicz G, Śniez˙yński M, Drop A, Maciejewski R. 2011. Application of rapid prototyping techniques for modelling of anatomical structures in medical training and education. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 70:1-4.
32. Turney BW. 2014. A new model with an anatomically accurate human renal collecting system for training in fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy access. J Endourol 28:360-363.
33. Vaccarezza M, Papa V. 2015. 3D printing: A valuable resource in human anatomy education. Anat Sci Int 90:64-65.
34. Vieira SL, Pavan TZ. Junior JE. Carneiro AA 2013. Paraffin-gel tissue-mimicking material for ultrasound-guided needle biopsy phantom. Ultrasound Med Biol 39:2477-2484.
35. Vidal FP, Villard PF, Holbrey R, John NW, Bello F, Bulpitt A, Gould DA. 2009. Developing an immersive ultrasound guided needle puncture simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform 142:398-400.
36. Villard PF, Vidal FP, ap Cenydd L, Holbrey R, Pisharody S, Johnson S, Bulpitt A, John NW, Bello F, Gould D. 2014. Interventional radiology virtual simulator for liver biopsy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 9:255-267.
37. Watson RA. 2014. A low-cost surgical application of additive fabrication. J Surg Educ 71:14-17.