Impaired facilitatory mechanisms of auditory attention after damage of the lateral prefrontal cortex

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 25, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 4126-4134

  Bidet Caulet, Aurélie ^a,b   Buchanan, Kelly G ^a   Viswanath, Humsini ^a   Black, Jessica ^a   Scabini, Donatella ^a   Bonnet Brilhault, Frédérique ^a,c   Knight, Robert T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS   (France)

Author keywords

Attention; Brain event related potentials; EEG; Frontal; Lesion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY SELECTIVE ATTENTION; BRAIN DAMAGE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EYE MOVEMENT; FACILITATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SOUND TRANSMISSION; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER WITH HYPERACTIVITY; AUDITORY EVOKED POTENTIAL; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPLICATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HEARING; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MENTAL HEALTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREFRONTAL CORTEX;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER WITH HYPERACTIVITY; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN INJURIES; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MENTAL STATUS SCHEDULE; MIDDLE AGED; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; REACTION TIME; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 84954305332     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu131     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aguera PE, Jerbi K, Caclin A, Bertrand O. 2011. ELAN: A software package for analysis and visualization of MEG, EEG, and LFP signals. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011:158970.
2. Alain C, Achim A, Richer F. 1993. Perceptual context and the selective attention effect on auditory event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology. 30:572-580.
3. Alain C, Woods DL. 1994. Signal clustering modulates auditory cortical activity in humans. Percept Psychophys. 56:501-516.
4. Alho K, Donauer N, Paavilainen P, Reinikainen K, Sams M, Naatanen R. 1987. Stimulus selection during auditory spatial attention as expressed by event-related potentials. Biol Psychol. 24:153-162.
5. Alho K, Woods DL, Algazi A. 1994. Processing of auditory stimuli during auditory and visual attention as revealed by event-related potentials. Psychophysiology. 31:469-479.
6. Anderson MC, Ochsner KN, Kuhl B, Cooper J, Robertson E, Gabrieli SW, Glover GH, Gabrieli JD. 2004. Neural systems underlying the suppression of unwanted memories. Science. 303:232-235.
7. Aron AR, Fletcher PC, Bullmore ET, Sahakian BJ, Robbins TW. 2003. Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans. Nat Neurosci. 6:115-116.
8. Barcelo F, Suwazono S, Knight RT. 2000. Prefrontal modulation of visual processing in humans. Nat Neurosci. 3:399-403.
9. Bartus RT, Levere TE. 1977. Frontal decortication in rhesus monkeys: A test of the interference hypothesis. Brain Res. 119:233-248.
10. Berman SM, Heilweil R, Ritter W, Rosen J. 1989. Channel probability and Nd: an event-related potential sign of attention strategies. Biol Psychol. 29:107-124.
11. Bidet-Caulet A, Fischer C, Besle J, Aguera PE, Giard MH, Bertrand O. 2007. Effects of selective attention on the electrophysiological representation of concurrent sounds in the human auditory cortex. J Neurosci. 27:9252-9261.
12. Bidet-Caulet A, Mikyska C, Knight RT. 2010. Load effects in auditory selective attention: evidence for distinct facilitation and inhibition mechanisms. Neuroimage. 50:277-284.
13. Chadick JZ, Gazzaley A. 2011. Differential coupling of visual cortex with default or frontal-parietal network based on goals. Nat Neurosci. 14:830-832.
14. Chait M, de Cheveigne A, Poeppel D, Simon JZ. 2010. Neural dynamics of attending and ignoring in human auditory cortex. Neuropsychologia. 48:3262-3271.
15. Chao LL, Knight RT. 1998. Contribution of human prefrontal cortex to delay performance. J Cogn Neurosci. 10:167-177.
16. Chao LL, Knight RT. 1995. Human prefrontal lesions increase distractibility to irrelevant sensory inputs. Neuroreport. 6:1605-1610.
17. Degerman A, Rinne T, Sarkka AK, Salmi J, Alho K. 2008. Selective attention to sound location or pitch studied with event-related brain potentials and magnetic fields. Eur J Neurosci. 27: 3329-3341.
18. Donald MW. 1987. The timing and polarity of different attentionrelated ERP changes inside and outside of the attentional focus. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 40:81-86.
19. Edgington ES. 1995. Randomization tests: third edition: revised and expanded. New York: Marcel Dekker.
20. Gazzaley A, Clapp W, Kelley J, McEvoy K, Knight RT, D'Esposito M. 2008. Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:13122-13126.
21. Gazzaley A, Cooney JW, Rissman J, D'Esposito M. 2005. Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nat Neurosci. 8:1298-1300.
22. Gehring WJ, Knight RT. 2002. Lateral prefrontal damage affects processing selection but not attention switching. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 13:267-279.
23. Giard MH, Fort A, Mouchetant-Rostaing Y, Pernier J. 2000. Neurophysiological mechanisms of auditory selective attention in humans. Front Biosci. 5:D84-D94.
24. Gil-Gomez de Liano B, Umilta C, Stablum F, Tebaldi F, Cantagallo A. 2010. Attentional distractor interference may be diminished by concurrent working memory load in normal participants and traumatic brain injury patients. Brain Cogn. 74:298-305.
25. Jonides J, Smith EE, Marshuetz C, Koeppe RA, Reuter-Lorenz PA. 1998. Inhibition in verbal working memory revealed by brain activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 95:8410-8413.
26. Kastner S, Ungerleider LG. 2000. Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 23:315-341.
27. Knight RT, Hillyard SA, Woods DL, Neville HJ. 1981. The effects of frontal cortex lesions on event-related potentials during auditory selective attention. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 52: 571-582.
28. Knight RT, Hillyard SA, Woods DL, Neville HJ. 1980. The effects of frontal and temporal-parietal lesions on the auditory evoked potential in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 50: 112-124.
29. Konishi S, Nakajima K, Uchida I, Kikyo H, Kameyama M, Miyashita Y. 1999. Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI. Brain. 122(Pt 5):981-991.
30. Malmo RB. 1942. Interference factors in delayed response in monkey after removal of the frontal lobes. J Neurophysiol. 5:295-308.
31. Melara RD, Rao A, Tong Y. 2002. The duality of selection: excitatory and inhibitory processes in auditory selective attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 28:279-306.
32. Michie PT, Bearpark HM, Crawford JM, Glue LC. 1990. The nature of selective attention effects on auditory event-related potentials. Biol Psychol. 30:219-250.
33. Michie PT, Solowij N, Crawford JM, Glue LC. 1993. The effects of between-source discriminability on attended and unattended auditory ERPs. Psychophysiology. 30:205-220.
34. Miller BT, Vytlacil J, Fegen D, Pradhan S, D'Esposito M. 2011. The prefrontal cortex modulates category selectivity in human extrastriate cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 23:1-10.
35. Muller-Preuss P, Newman JD, Jurgens U. 1980. Anatomical and physiological evidence for a relationship between the 'cingular' vocalization area and the auditory cortex in the squirrel monkey. Brain Res. 202:307-315.
36. Muller-Preuss P, Ploog D. 1981. Inhibition of auditory cortical neurons during phonation. Brain Res. 215:61-76.
37. Näätänen R. 1992. Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Näätänen R. 1982. Processing negativity: an evoked-potential reflection of selective attention. Psychol Bull. 92:605-640.
39. Naghavi HR, Nyberg L. 2005. Common fronto-parietal activity in attention, memory, and consciousness: shared demands on integration? Conscious Cogn. 14:390-425.
40. Nielson KA, Langenecker SA, Garavan H. 2002. Differences in the functional neuroanatomy of inhibitory control across the adult life span. Psychol Aging. 17:56-71.
41. Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Echallier JF. 1989. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr Clin Neuro. 72:184-187.
42. Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Giard M-H. 1987. Mapping of scalp potentials by surface spline interpolation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neuro. 66:75-81.
43. Rissman J, Gazzaley A, D'Esposito M. 2009. The effect of non-visual working memory load on top-down modulation of visual processing. Neuropsychologia. 47:1637-1646.
44. Schröger E, Eimer M. 1997. Endogenous covert spatial orienting in audition: "cost-benefit" analyses of reaction times and event-related potentials. Q J Exp Psychol. 50A:457-474.
45. Sinnett S, Snyder JJ, Kingstone A. 2009. Role of the lateral prefrontal cortex in visual object-based selective attention. Exp Brain Res. 194:191-196.
46. Woods DL, Knight RT. 1986. Electrophysiologic evidence of increased distractibility after dorsolateral prefrontal lesions. Neurology. 36:212-216.
47. Yago E, Duarte A, Wong T, Barcelo F, Knight RT. 2004. Temporal kinetics of prefrontal modulation of the extrastriate cortex during visual attention. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 4:609-617.
48. Zanto TP, Rubens MT, Thangavel A, Gazzaley A. 2011. Causal role of the prefrontal cortex in top-down modulation of visual processing and working memory. Nat Neurosci. 14:656-661.