Infants' preference for native audiovisual speech dissociated from congruency preference

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2015, Pages

  Shaw, Kathleen ^a   Baart, Martijn ^b   Depowski, Nicole ^a   Bortfeld, Heather ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b BASQUE CENTER ON COGNITION   (Spain)

^c HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLED STUDY; DISSOCIATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFANT; LANGUAGE; SPEECH; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FACE; FEMALE; MALE; PHONETICS; PHOTOSTIMULATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; LANGUAGE; MALE; PHONETICS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84954296645     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126059     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Eimas PD, Siqueland ER, Jusczyk P, Vigorito J. Speech perception in infants. Science 1971; 171: 303-6. PMID: 5538846
2. Weikum WM, Vouloumanos A, Navarra J, Soto-Faraco S, Sebastian-Gallés N, et al. Visual language discrimination in infancy. Science 2007; 316: 1159. PMID: 17525331
3. Kuhl PK, Williams KA, Lacerda F, Stevens KN, Lindblom B. Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 1992; 255(5044): 606-8. PMID: 1736364
4. Werker JF, Tees RC. Cross-language speech-perception-evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behav Dev 1984; 7: 49-63.
5. Best CT, McRoberts GW, Goodell E. Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001; 109(2): 775-94. PMID: 11248981
6. Vouloumanos A, Hauser MD, Werker JF, Martin A. The tuning of human neonates' preference for speech. Child Dev. 2010; 81(2): 517-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01412.x PMID: 20438457
7. Palmer SB, Fais L, Golinkoff RM, Werker JF. Perceptual narrowing of linguistic sign occurs in the 1st year of life. Child Dev. 2012; 83(2): 543-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01715.x PMID: 22277043
8. Lewkowicz DJ, Pons F. Recognition of amodal language identity emerges in infancy. Int J Behav Dev. 2013; 37(2): 90-4. PMID: 24648601
9. Kubicek C, Hillairet de Boisefron A, Dupierrix E, Pascalis O, Lœvenbruck H et al. Cross-modal matching of audio-visual German and French fluent speech in infancy. PLOS ONE. 2014; 9(2): e89275. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089275 PMID: 24586651
10. Baart M, Vroomen J, Shaw K, Bortfeld H. Degrading phonetic information affects matching of audiovisual speech in adults, but not in infants. Cognition. 2014; 130(1): 31-43. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.09.006 PMID: 24141035
11. Kubicek C, De Boisferon AH, Dupierrix E, Lœvenbruck H, Gervain J, Schwarzer G. Face-scanning behavior to silently-talking faces in 12-month-old infants: The impact of pre-exposed auditory speech. Int J Behav Dev. 2013; 37(2): 106-10.
12. Lewkowicz DJ, Hansen-Tift AM. Infants deploy selective attention to the mouth of a talking face when learning speech. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109: 1431-6. doi:10.1073/pnas.1114783109 PMID: 22307596
13. Pons F, Lewkowicz DJ, Soto-Faraco S, Sebastian-Galles N. Narrowing of intersensory speech perception in infancy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106: 10598-602. doi:10.1073/pnas.0904134106 PMID: 19541648
14. Kuhl PK, Meltzoff AN. The bimodal perception of speech in infancy. Science. 1982; 218: 1138-41. PMID: 7146899
15. Patterson ML, Werker JF. Matching phonetic information in lips and voice is robust in 4.5-month-old infants. Infant Behav Dev. 1999; 22(2): 237-47.
16. Patterson ML, Werker JF. Two-month-old infants match phonetic information in lips and voice. Dev Sci. 2003; 6: 191-6.
17. Patterson ML, Werker JF. Infants' ability to match dynamic phonetic and gender information in the face and voice. J Exp Child Psychol. 2002; 81(1): 93-115. PMID: 11741376
18. Lewkowicz DJ, Ghazanfar AA. The decline of cross-species intersensory perception in human infants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(17): 6771-4. PMID: 16618919
19. Kubicek C, Gervain J, Hillairet de Boisferon A, Pascalis O, Lœvenbruck H et al. The influence of infant-directed speech on 12-month-olds' intersensory perception of fluent speech. Infant Behav Dev. 2014; 37(4): 644-51. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.08.010 PMID: 25238663
20. Stein BE, Meredith MA. The merging of the senses. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1993.
21. Parise CV, Spence C, Ernst MO. When correlation implies causation in multisensory integration. Curr Biol. 2012; 22(1): 46-9. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.039 PMID: 22177899
22. Lewkowicz DJ. Infant perception of audio-visual speech synchrony. Dev Psychol. 2010; 46(1): 66-77. doi:10.1037/a0015579 PMID: 20053007
23. Bahrick LE. Infants' intermodal perception of two levels of temporal structure in natural events. Infant Behav Dev. 1987; 10: 387-416.
24. Gogate LJ, Bahrick LE. Intersensory redundancy facilitates learning of arbitrary relations between vowel sounds and objects in seven-month-old infants. J Exp Child Psychol. 1998; 69: 133-49. PMID: 9637756
25. Dodd B. Lip reading in infants: attention to speech presented in- and out-of-synchrony. Cogn Psychol. 1979; 11(4): 478-84. PMID: 487747
26. Lawson KR. Spatial and temporal congruity and auditory-visual integration in infants. Dev Psychol. 1980; 16(3): 185-92.
27. Lewkowicz DJ. Perception of auditory-visual temporal synchrony in human infants. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996; 22(5): 1094-106. PMID: 8865617
28. Morein-Zamir S, Soto-Faraco S, Kingstone A. Auditory capture of vision: examining temporal ventriloquism. Brain Res Cog Brain Res. 2003; 17(1): 154-63. PMID: 12763201
29. van Wassenhove V, Grant KW, Poeppel D. Temporal window of integration in auditory-visual speech perception. Neuropsychologia. 2007; 45(3): 598-607. PMID: 16530232
30. Vroomen J, Keetels M, de Gelder B, Bertelson P. Recalibration of temporal order perception by exposure to audio-visual asynchrony. Brain Res Cog Brain Res. 2004; 22(1): 32-5.
31. Desjardins RN, Werker JF. Is the integration of heard and seen speech mandatory for infants? Dev Psychobiol. 2004; 45: 187-203. PMID: 15549681
32. Baart M, Bortfeld H, Vroomen J. Phonetic matching of auditory and visual speech develops during childhood: Evidence from sine-wave speech. J Exp Child Psychol. 2015; 129: 157-64. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.08.002 PMID: 25258018
33. Maidment DW, Kang HJ, Stewart HJ, Amitay S. Audiovisual integration in children listening to spectrally degraded speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2014; Accessed 2 April 2015.
34. Desjardins RN, Rogers J, Werker JF. An exploration of why preschoolers perform differently than do adults in audiovisual speech perception tasks. J Exp Child Psychol. 1997; 66: 85-110. PMID: 9226935
35. Best CT, Kroos C, Irwin J. Do infants detect a-v articulator congruency for non-native click consonants? International Conference on Audio-Visual Speech Processing (AVSP) 2011: Volterra, Italy.
36. Tomalski P, Ribeiro H, Ballieux H, Axelsson EL, Murphy E, Kushnerenko E. Exploring early developmental changes in face scanning patterns during the perception of audiovisual mismatch of speech cues. Eur J Dev Psychol. 2013; 10(5): 611-24.
37. Kushnerenko E, Tomalski P, Ballieux H, Ribeiro H, Potton A, Axelsson EL, et al. Brain responses to audiovisual speech mismatch in infants are associated with individual differences in looking behaviour. Eur J Neurosci. 2013; 8(9): 3363-9. doi:10.1111/ejn.12317 PMID: 23889202
38. Kushnerenko E, Teinonen T, Volein A, Csibra G. Electrophysiological evidence of illusory audiovisual speech percept in human infants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(32): 11442-5. doi:10.1073/pnas.0804275105 PMID: 18682564
39. Bristow D, Dehaene-Lamberts G, Mattout J, Soares C, Gliga T, Baillet S. et al. Hearing Faces: How the infant brain matches the face it sees with the speech it hears. J Cogn Neurosci 2009; 21(5): 905-921. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21076 PMID: 18702595
40. Teinonen T, Aslin RN, Alku P, Csibra G. Visual speech contributes to phonetic learning in 6-month-old infants. Cognition. 2008; 108(3): 850-5. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.009 PMID: 18590910