Fit-for-work or fit-for-unemployment? Does the reassessment of disability benefit claimants using a tougher work capability assessment help people into work?

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Volumn 70, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 452-458

  Barr, B ^a   Taylor Robinson, D ^a   Stuckler, D ^b   Loopstra, R ^b   Reeves, A ^c   Wickham, S ^a   Whitehead, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; FITNESS; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH IMPACT; HEALTH MONITORING; HEALTH SURVEY; LABOR POLICY; MENTAL HEALTH; POLICY MAKING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; UNEMPLOYMENT; UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT;

ENGLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

DISABLED PERSON; EMPLOYMENT; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSURANCE; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; WORK CAPACITY;

DISABLED PERSONS; EMPLOYMENT; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HUMANS; INSURANCE CLAIM REVIEW; INSURANCE, DISABILITY; MALE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; WORK CAPACITY EVALUATION;

EID: 84954290214     PISSN: 0143005X     EISSN: 14702738     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2015-206333     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. OECD. Transforming disability into ability policies to promote work and income security for disabled people. Paris: OECD, 2003
2. Baumberg B, Warren J, Garthwaite K, et al. Rethinking the work capability assessment. London: Demos, 2015
3. Holland P, Burström B, Whitehead M, et al. How do macro-level contexts and policies affect the employment chances of chronically ill and disabled people? Part I: the impact of recession and deindustrialization. Int J Health Serv 2011;41:395-413
4. OECD. Fit mind, fit job. OECD Publishing, 2015. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/employment/fit-mind-fit-job_9789264228283-en (accessed 9 Mar 2015)
5. Department for Work and Pensions. Employment and support allowance: outcomes of work capability assessments. London: Department for Work and Pensions, 2014
6. Harrington M. Work capability assessment independent review-year 1. London: Stationery Office, 2010. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/work-capability-assessment-independent-review-year-1 (accessed 9 Jun 2014)
7. Litchfield P. An independent review of the work capability assessment-year four. London: The Stationery Office, 2013
8. Department for Work and Pensions. Government's response to the independent review of the work capability assessment-year five. The Stationery Office, 2015
9. Litchfield P, Great Britain, Department for Work and Pensions, et al. An independent review of the work capability assessment-year five. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 2014
10. Barnes H, Sissons P, Stevens H. Employment and support allowance: findings from a follow-up survey with customers. London: Department for Work and Pensions, 2011. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/214556/rrep774.pdf (accessed 18 Aug 2015)
11. Staubli S. The impact of stricter criteria for disability insurance on labor force participation. J Public Econ 2011;95:1223-35
12. Beatty C, Fothergill S. Incapacity benefits in the UK: an issue of health or jobs. 2011. http://www.social-policy.org.uk/lincoln/Beatty.pdf (accessed 18 Jan 2015)
13. Beatty C, Fothergill S. Hidden unemployment among men: a case study. Reg Stud 2002;36:811-23. http://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v36y2002i8p811-823.html (accessed 20 Dec 2011)
14. Bound J. Health and earnings of rejected disability insurance applicants. Am Econ Rev 1989;79:482-503
15. Chen S, van der Klaauw W. The work disincentive effects of the disability insurance program in the 1990s. J Econ 2008;142:757-84. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/econom/v142y2008i2p757-784.html (accessed 27 Aug 2015)
16. Wachter T, von Song J, Manchester J. Trends in employment and earnings of allowed and rejected applicants to the social security disability insurance program. Am Econ Rev 2011;101:3308-29
17. Barr B, Clayton S, Whitehead M, et al. To what extent have relaxed eligibility requirements and increased generosity of disability benefits acted as disincentives for employment? A systematic review of evidence from countries with well-developed welfare systems. J Epidemiol Community Health 2010;64: 1106-14
18. Barr B, Taylor-Robinson D, Stuckler D, et al. 'First, do no harm': Are disability assessments associated with adverse trends in mental health? A longitudinal ecological study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2016;70:339-45
19. ONS. Labour Force Survey user guide, volume 1-LFS background and methodology 2011. London: ONS, 2011
20. International Labour Organisation. Key Indicators of the Labour Market (KILM). Key Indic. Labour Mark. 2011. http://www.ilo.org/empelm/what/WCMS_114240/lang-en/index.htm (accessed 29 May 2013)
21. Department for Communities and Local Government. The English Indices of Deprivation 2010. 2011. http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/corporate/statistics/indices2010 (accessed 17 Jan 2012)
22. Office for National Statistics. NOMIS-official labour market statistics. 2014. http://www.nomisweb.co.uk/(accessed 10 Sep 2014)
23. Office for National Statistics. Regional accounts methodology guide. London: ONS, 2010
24. Jenkins SP. Easy estimation methods for discrete-time duration models. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 1995;57:129-36
25. Cappellari L, Dorsett R, Haile G. Labour market transitions among the over-50s. London: Department of Work and Pensions, 2005./PDF/capellari_2005_labouor marrket transitions among over 50s-0342419712/capellari_2005_labouor marrket transitions among over 50s.pdf
26. Jones AM, Koolman X, Rice N. Health-related non-response in the BHPS and ECHP: using inverse probability weighted estimators in nonlinear models. Health Econ Data Group 2005;5. http://www.york.ac.uk/media/economics/documents/herc/wp/05_05.pdf (accessed 26 Aug 2015)
27. Davies B. In safe hands? Rethinking employment pathways for ESA claimants with mental health problems. Newcastle: IPPR North, 2014
28. Department for Work and Pensions. Employment and support allowance: work capability assessment outcomes by physical and mental health condition. London: The Stationery Office, 2012
29. New data: More than 100 people per day with mental health problems are having their benefits sanctioned./news-and-events/news-releases/new-data-more-than-100-people-per-day-with-mental-health-problems-are-having-their-benefits-sanctioned (accessed 25 Feb 2015)
30. Loopstra R, Reeves A, McKee M, et al. Do punitive approaches to unemployment benefit recipients increase welfare exit and employment? A crossarea analysis of UK sanctioning reforms. Sociol Work Pap 2015;2015-01. http://www.sociology.ox.ac.uk/materials/papers/sanction120115-2.pdf (accessed 26 Jun 2015)
31. Loopstra R, Reeves A, Taylor-Robinson D, et al. Austerity, sanctions, and the rise of food banks in the UK. BMJ 2015;350:h1775