Carbon implications of converting cropland to bioenergy crops or forest for climate mitigation: A global assessment

GCB Bioenergy

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 81-95

  Albanito, Fabrizio ^a   Beringer, Tim ^b   Corstanje, Ronald ^c   Poulter, Benjamin ^d   Stephenson, Anna ^e   Zawadzka, Joanna ^c   Smith, Pete ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

^c CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Department of Energy and Climate Change ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bioenergy crops; Climate change mitigation; Cropland; Dinamic global vegetation model; Forest; Land use change

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; CLIMATE MODELS; CROPS; CULTIVATION; FORESTRY; FOSSIL FUELS; LAND USE; OILS AND FATS; REFORESTATION; VEGETATION;

BIOENERGY CROPS; CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION; CROPLAND; FOREST; LAND-USE CHANGE; VEGETATION MODEL;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; BIOENERGY; CARBON; CARBON SINK; ENERGY CROP; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH; FORESTRY PRODUCTION; LAND USE CHANGE; MITIGATION; VEGETATION COVER;

EID: 84954287773     PISSN: 17571693     EISSN: 17571707     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12242     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Agostini A, Giuntoli J, Boulamanti A (2013) Carbon Accounting of Forest Bioenergy. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Luxembourg. Available at: http://iet.jrc.ec.europa.eu/bf-ca/sites/bf-ca/files/files/documents/eur25354en_online-final.pdf (accessed 06 March 2014).
2. Anderson W, You L, Stanley W, Wood-Sichra U, Wu W (2014) A comparative analysis of global cropping systems models and maps. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), 01327.
3. Batidzirai B, Smeets E, Faaij A (2012) Harmonising bioenergy resource potentials - methodological lessons from review of state of the art bioenergy potential assessments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 6598-6630.
4. Beringer T, Lucht W, Schaphoff S (2011) Bioenergy production potential of global biomass plantations under environmental and agricultural constraints. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 3, 299-312.
5. Bird DN, Pena N, Schwaiger H, Zanchi G (2010) Review of existing methods for carbon accounting. Occasional paper 54, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
6. Bockel L, Gentien A, Tinlot M, Bromhead M (2010) From Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) to Low-Carbon Development in Agriculture: NAMAs as Pathway at Country Level. Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome, Italy. Available at: http://www.nama-database.org/index.php/. From Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) to Low-Carbon Development in Agriculture.
7. Bondeau A, Smith PC, Zaehle S, Schaphoff S, Lucht W, Cramer W, Gerten D (2007) Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance. Global Change Biology, 13, 679-706.
8. Campbell JE, Lobell D, Genova R, Field CB (2008) The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agricultural lands. Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 5791-5795.
9. Cannell MGR (2003) Carbon sequestration and biomass energy offset: theoretical, potential and achievable capacities globally, in Europe and in UK. Biomass and Bioenergy, 24, 96-116.
10. 2 emissions from bioenergy. Ecological Modelling, 223, 59-66.
11. Clifton-Brown JC, Breuer J, Jones MB (2007) Carbon mitigation by the energy crop, Miscanthus. Global Change Biology, 13, 2296-2307.
12. Creutzig F, Ravindranath NH, Berndes G et al. (2014) Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12205.
13. Crossman ND, Bryan BA, Summers DM (2011) Carbon payments and low-cost conservation. Conservation Biology, 25, 835-845.
14. Dentener F et al. (2006) The 5 global atmospheric environments for the next generation. Environmental Science & Technology, 40, 3586-3594.
15. Directive (2009/28/EC) Of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Official Journal of the European Union. Brussels.
16. EU (2009) Directive 2009/28/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, L140/16-62.
17. Fales S, Moore K, Kilborn D (2008) Variation in Biomass Yield of Switchgrass Grown for Biofuel. Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
18. FAO-FRA (2010) Global forest resources assessments.
19. FAO/IIASA/ISRIC/ISS-CAS/JRC (2009) Harmonized World Soil Database (Version 1.1). FAO, Rome, Italy and IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.
20. Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science, 319, 1235-1238.
21. Field CB, Campbell JE, Lobell DB (2008) Biomass energy: the scale of the potential resource. Trends in ecology & evolution, 23, 65-72.
22. Fischer G, Nachtergaele F, Prieler S, van Velthuizen HT, Verelst L, Wiberg D (2008) Global Agro-ecological Zones Assessment for Agriculture (GAEZ 2008). IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria and FAO, Rome, Italy.
23. Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Zaks DP (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478, 337-342.
24. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAOSTAT) (2014) Database. Available at: http://data.fao.org/ref/262b79ca-279c-4517-93de-ee3b7c7cb553.html?version=1.0 (accessed 27 June 2014).
25. Gallagher E (2008) The Gallagher Review of the Indirect Effects of Biofuels Production. Renewable Fuels Agency, East Sussex, UK.
26. Gibbs HK, Ruesch AS, Achard F, Clayton MK, Holmgren P, Ramankutty N, Foley JA (2010) Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 16732-16737.
27. Gopalakrishnan GM, Negri C, Snyder SW (2011) Novel framework to classify marginal land for sustainable biomass feedstock production. Journal of Environmental Quality, 40, 1593-1600.
28. Guo LB, Gifford RM (2002) Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology., 8, 345-360.
29. Haddaway NR, Styles D, Pullin AS (2013) Environmental impacts of farm land abandonment in high altitude/mountain regions: a systematic map of the evidence. Environmental Evidence, 2, 18.
30. Haim D, White EM, Alig RJ (2014) Permanence of agricultural afforestation for carbon sequestration under stylized carbon markets in the U.S. Forest Policy and Economics, 41, 12-21.
31. Hansen EA (1991) Poplar woody biomass yields: a look to the future. Biomass and Bioenergy, 1, 1-7.
32. Hiederer R, Kochy M (2012) Global Soil Organic Carbon Estimates and the Harmonized World Soil Database. European Commission Joint Research Centre Scientific and Technical Research series. Luxembourg. ISSN 1831-9424 (online), ISSN 1018-5593 (print), ISBN 978-92-79-23108-7. DOI: 10.2788/13267.
33. Holtsmark B (2010) Use of Wood Fuels from Boreal Forests Will Create a Biofuel Carbon Debt with a Long Payback Time. Statistics Norway, Norway.
34. Hoogwijk M, Faaij A, Eickhout B, De Vries B, Turkenburg W (2005) Potential of biomass energy out to 2100, for four IPCC SRES land-use scenarios. Biomass and Bioenergy, 29, 225-257.
35. Hoogwijk M, Faaij A, De Vries B, Turkenburg W (2009) Exploration of regional and global cost-supply curves of biomass energy from short-rotation crops at abandoned cropland and rest land under four IPCC SRES land-use scenarios. Biomass and Bioenergy, 33, 26-43.
36. Houghton RA (2002) Terrestrial carbon sinks - uncertain explanations. Biologist, 49, 155-159.
37. Hynynen J, Ahtikoski A, Siitonen J et al. (2005) Applying the MOTTI simulator to analyse the effects of alternative management schedules on timber and non-timber production. Forest Ecology and Management, 207, 5-18.
38. IPCC (2000) Special report on emission scenarios. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, www.ipcc.ch (accessed 24 November 2013).
39. IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. In: IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme Technical Support Unit Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use, Vol 4 (eds Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Pipatti R, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K), IGES, Hayama, Japan.
40. Johnson E (2009) Goodbye to carbon neutral: getting biomass footprints right. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29, 165-168.
41. Jandl R., Alm J, Vesterdal L et al. (2011) Soil carbon in sensitive european ecosystems: from science to land management ? a summary In: Soil Carbon in Sensitive European Ecosystems (eds Jandl R, Rodeghiero M, Olsson M), pp. 267-281 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Prentice Hall, NJ.
42. Kang S, Nair SS, Kline KL et al. (2014) Global simulation of bioenergy crop productivity: analytical framework and case study for switchgrass. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 6, 14-25.
43. Keith H, Mackey DB, Lindenmayer DB (2009) Re-evaluation of forest biomass carbon stocks and lessons from the world's most carbon-dense forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 11635-11640.
44. Kim MK, McCarl BA, Murray BC (2008) Permanence discounting for land-based carbon sequestration. Ecological Economics, 64, 763-769.
45. Krausmann F, Erb K-H, Gingrich S, Lauk C, Haberl H (2008a) Global patterns of socioeconomic biomass flows in the year 2000: a comprehensive assessment of supply, consumption and constraints. Ecological Economics, 65, 471-487.
46. Luyssaert S, Schulze ED, Börner A et al. (2008) Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks. Nature, 455, 213-215.
47. MacDonald D, Crabtree J, Wiesinger G et al. (2000) Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: environmental consequences and policy response. Journal of Environmental Management, 59, 47-69.
48. Manomet (2010) Massachusetts biomass sustainability and carbon policy study: report to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources. Natural Capital Initiative Report NCI-2010-03. 182. Available at: http://www.manomet.org/sites/manomet.org/files/Manomet_Biomass_Report_Full_LoRez.pdf.
49. Marín-Spiotta E, Cusack DF, Ostertag R, Silver WL (2008) Trends in above and belowground carbon with forest regrowth after agricultural abandonment in the Neotropics. In: Post-Agricultural Succession in the Neotropics (ed Myster R), pp. 22-72. Springer, New York, NY.
50. Mitchell SR, Harmon ME, O'Connel KEB (2012) Carbon debt and carbon sequestration parity in forest bioenergy production. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 4, 818-827.
51. Monfreda C, Ramankutty N, Foley JA (2008) Farming the planet: 2. Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and net primary production in the year 2000. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 22, GB1022.
52. New MG, Hulme M, Jones PD (2000) Representing twentieth-century space-climate variability, Part II, Development of 1901-1996 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate. Journal of Climate, 13, 2217-2238.
53. Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Fang J et al. (2011) A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests. Science, 333, 988-993.
54. Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Phillips OL, Jackson RB (2013) The structure, distribution, and biomass of the world's forests. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 44, 593-622.
55. PAS 2050 (2008) Specification for the Assessment of the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Goods And Services. BSI, London.
56. Paterson SE, Bryan BA (2012) Food-carbon trade-offs between agriculture and eforestation and the efficiency of market-based policies. Ecology and Society, 17, 21.
57. Pavlick R, Drewry DT, Bohn K, Reu B, Kleidon A (2013) The Jena diversity-dynamic global vegetation model (JeDi-DVGM): a diverse approach to representing terrestrial biogeography and biogeochemistry based on plant functional trade-offs. Biogeosciences, 10, 4137-4177.
58. Petrescu AMR, Abad-Viñas R, Janssens-Maenhout G, Blujdea VNB, Grassi G (2012) Global estimates of carbon stock changes in living forest biomass: EDGARv4.3 - time series from 1990 to 2010. Biogeosciences, 9, 3437-3447.
59. Pingoud K, Pohjola J, Valsta L (2010) Assessing the integrated climatic impacts of forestry and wood products. Silva Fennica, 44, 155-175.
60. Pingoud K, Ekholm T, Savolainen I (2012) Global warming potential factors and warming payback time as climate indicators of forest biomass use. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 17, 369-386.
61. Pointereau P, Coulon F, Girard P et al. (2008) Analysis of Farmland Abandonment and The Extent and Location of Agricultural Areas That are Actually Abandoned or are in Risk to Be Abandoned. European Commission-JRC-Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra.
62. Portmann FT, Siebert S, Döll P (2010) MIRCA2000 - global monthly irrigated and rainfed crop areas around the year 2000: a new high-resolution data set for agricultural and hydrological modeling. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 24, GB1011, doi: 10.1029/2008GB003435.
63. Poulter B, Ciais P, Hodson E, Lischke H, Maignan F, Plummer S, Zimmermann NE (2011) Plant functional type mapping for earth system models. Geoscientific Model Development, 4, 993-1010.
64. Qin Z, Zhuang Q, Cai X (2014) Bioenergy crop productivity and potential climate change mitigation from marginal lands in the United States: an ecosystem modeling perspective. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12212.
65. Ravindranath NH, Manuvie R, Fargione J et al. (2009) Greenhouse gas implications of land use and land conversion to biofuel crops. In: Biofuels: Environmental Consequences and Interactions with Changing Land Use (eds Howarth RW, Bringezu S). Proceedings of the Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE) International Biofuels Project Rapid Assessment, 22-25 September 2008, Gummersbach Germany, pp. 111-125. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. Available at: http://cip.cornell.edu/biofuels/.
66. Ruesch A, Gibbs HK (2008) New IPCC Tier-1 Global Biomass Carbon Map for the Year 2000. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge, TN. Available at: http://cdiac.ornl.gov.
67. Saatchia SS, Harrisc NL, Brownc S et al. (2011) Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 9899-9904.
68. Schlamadinger B, Bird N, Johns T et al. (2007) A synopsis of land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) under the Kyoto Protocol and Marrakech Accords. Environmental Science & Policy, 10, 271-282.
69. Schulze E-D, Körner C, Law BE, Haberl H, Luyssaert S (2012) Large-scale bioenergy from additional harvest of forest biomass is neither sustainable nor greenhouse gas neutral. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 4, 611-616.
70. Schwarzbauer P, Stern T (2010) Energy vs. Material: economic impacts of a wood-for-energy scenario on the forest-based sector in Austria - A simulation approach. Forest Policy and Economics, 12, 31-38.
71. Searchinger TD, Hamburg SP, Melillo J et al. (2009) Fixing a critical climate accounting error. Science, 326, 527-528.
72. Searle SY, Malins CJ (2014) Will energy crop yields meet expectations? Biomass and Bioenergy, 65, 3-12.
73. Silver WL, Ostertag R, Lugo AE (2000) The potential for carbon sequestration through reforestation of abandoned tropical agricultural and pasture lands. Restoration Ecology, 8, 394-407.
74. Sims REH, Hastings A, Schlamadinger B, Taylor G, Smith P (2006) Energy crops: current status and future prospects. Global Change Biology, 12, 2054-2076.
75. Sitch S, Smith B, Prentice IC et al. (2003) Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Global Change Biology, 9, 161-185.
76. Sitch S et al. (2013) Trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide over the past two decades. Biogeosciences Discussions, 10, 20113-20177.
77. Slade R, Bauen A, Gross R (2014) Global bioenergy resources. Nature Climate Change, 4, 99-105.
78. Smeets EMW, Faaij APC, Lewandowski IM, Turkenburg WC (2007) A bottom-up assessment and review of global bio-energy potentials to 2050. Progress in Energy and combustion science, 33, 56-106.
79. Smith P (2013) Delivering food security without increasing pressure on land. Global Food Security, 2, 18-23.
80. Smith P, Martino D, Cai Z et al. (2008) Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, 789-813.
81. Smith P, Gregory PJ, van Vuuren D et al. (2010) Competition for land. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365, 2941-2957.
82. Smith P, Davies CA, Ogle S et al. (2012) Towards an integrated global framework to assess the impacts of land use and management change on soil carbon: current capability and future vision. Global Change Biology, 18, 2089-2101.
83. Smith P, Haberl H, Popp A et al. (2013a) How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals? Global Change Biology, 19, 2285-2302.
84. Smith P, Ashmore M, Black H et al. (2013b) The role of ecosystems and their management in regulating climate, and soil, water and air quality. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50, 812-829.
85. Smith P, Bustamante M, Ahammad H et al. (2014) Agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU). In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, van Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx J), chapter 11. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA.
86. Trail M, Tsimpidi AP, Liu P et al. (2013) Potential impact of land use change on future regional climate in the Southeastern U.S.: reforestation and crop land conversion. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118, 11577-11588.
87. Van Vuuren DP, van Vliet J, Stehfest E (2009) Future bio-energy potential under various natural constraints. Energy Policy, 37, 4220-4230.
88. Wang J, Liu Y, Liu Z (2013) Spatio-temporal patterns of cropland conversion in response to the "grain for green project" in China's Loess Hilly Region of Yanchuan County. Remote Sensing, 5, 5642-5661.
89. WBGU (German Advisory Councilon Global Change) (2009) World in Transition-Future bioenergy and Sustainable Land Use. Earthscan, London.
90. West PC, Gibbs HK, Monfreda C, Wagner J, Barford C, Carpenter SR, Foley JA (2010) Trading carbon for food: global comparison of carbon stocks vs. crop yields on agricultural land. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 19645-19648.
91. Wolf J, Bindraban P, Luijten J, Vleeshouwers L (2003) Exploratory study on the land area required for global food supply and the potential global production of bioenergy. Agricultural Systems, 76, 841-861.
92. You L, Wood S, Wood-Sichra U, Wu W (2014) Generating global crop distribution maps: from census to grid. Agricultural Systems, 127, 53-60.
93. Zanchi G, Pena N, Bird N (2011) Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 4, 761-772.