Comparison and verification of wake models in an onshore wind farm considering single wake condition of the 2 MW wind turbine

Energy

Volumn 93, Issue , 2015, Pages 1769-1777

  Jeon, Sanghyeon ^a   Kim, Bumsuk ^a   Huh, Jongchul ^a  

^a Jeju National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Engineering wake models; Single wake; Velocity deficit; Wake distance; Wind turbines

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC UTILITIES; FORECASTING; VISCOSITY; WAKES; WIND; WIND TURBINES;

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; DOWNSTREAM DISTANCES; MECHANICAL FATIGUE; MW WIND TURBINE; POWER PRODUCTION; PREDICTION ACCURACY; VELOCITY DEFICITS; WAKE MODEL;

ONSHORE WIND FARMS;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DESIGN; ENGINEERING; NUMERICAL MODEL; VISCOSITY; WAKE; WIND POWER; WIND TURBINE;

EID: 84954246176     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.09.086     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Jensen NO. A note on wind generator interaction. Tech. Report. Riso-M-2411(EN). Riso National Laboratory; 1983. Q2
2. Katic I, Hojstrup J, Jensen NO. A simple model for cluster efficient. In: EWEA conference; 1986. p. 407-10.
3. Larsen GC. A simple stationary semi-analytical wake model. Tech. Report. Riso-R-1713(EN). Riso National Laboratory; 2009.
4. Ainslie JF. Calculating the flow field in the wake of wind turbines. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 1988;27:213-24.
5. Frandsen Sten, Barthelmie Rebecca, Pryor Sara, Rathmann Ole, Larsen Soren, Hojstrup Jorgen, et al. Analytical modeling of wind speed deficit in large offshore wind farms. Wind Energy 2006;9:39-53.
6. Rados K, Larsen G, Barthelmie R, Schlez W, Lange B, Schepers G, et al. Comparison of wake models with data for offshore windfarms. Wind Eng 2001;25(5):271-80.
7. Schlez W, Umana A, Barthelmie R, Larsen G, Lange B, Schepers G, et al. ENDOW: improvement of wake models within offshore wind farms. Wind Eng 2001;25(5):281-7.
8. Barthelmie Rebecca, Larsen Gunner, Pryor Sara, Jorgensen Hans, et al. ENDOW (efficient development of offshore wind farms): modeling wake and boundary layer interactions. Wind Energy 2004;7:225-45. Q3
9. Barthlmie RJ, Schepers JG, van der Pijl SP, Rathmann O, Frandsen ST, Cabezon D, et al. Flow and wakes in complex terrain and offshore: model development and verification in UpWind. In: Wind Energy Conference, Milan; 2007. p. 10.
10. Barthelmie Rebecca, Schlez W, Phillips J, Neubert A, Hansen K, Rados K, et al. Comparing existing wake models with CFD offshore. Project UpWind, Deliverable D8.2. 2008.
11. Barthlmie RJ, Frandsen ST, Rathmann O, Hansen K, Politis ES, Prospathopoulos J, et al. Flow and wakes in large wind farms: final report for UpWind WP8. Riso DTU, Report number: Riso-R-1765(EN). 2011.
12. Hansen Kurt S, Barthelmie R. WP8Flow. Project UpWind, Deliverable D8.1. 2008.
13. Frandsen S. Turbulence and turbulence-generated fatigue loading in wind turbine clusters. Riso-R-1188(EN). 2005. p. 128.
14. Sorensen Thomas, Nielsen Per, Thogersen Morten Lybech. Adapting and calibration of existing wake models to meet the conditions inside offshore wind farms. EMD International A/S. 2008.
15. Ott S, Berg J, Nielsen M. Linearised CFD models for wakes. Tech. Report. Riso-R-1772(EN). Riso National Laboratory; 2011.
16. Gaumond M, Rethore P-E, Bechmann A, Ott S, Larsen GC, Pena A, et al. Benchmarking of wind turbine wake models in large offshore wind farms, DTU Wind Energy.
17. Larsen GC, Carlen I, Schepers GJ, European wind turbine standards II, Part 1, Sub A.
18. Cleijne JW. Results of sexbierum wind farm: single wake measurements. TNOreport. 112324-22420. TNO Institute of Environmental and Energy Technology; 1993.
19. Moriarty Patrick, Sanz Rodrigo Javier, Gancarski Pawel, Chuchfield Matthew, Naughton Jonathan W, Hansen Kurt S, et al. IEA-Task 31 WAKEBENCH: towards a protocol for wind farm flow model evaluation. Part 2: wind farm wake models. J Phys 2014. Conference Series 524/1/012185.
20. Sanderse B. Aerodynamics of wind turbine wakes. Tech. Report. ECN-E-09-016. Energy Research Centre of Netherlands; 2009.
21. International standard IEC 61400-1. 3rd ed. 2005. Annex D, International Electrotechnical Commission.
22. Anderson Mike, Stuart Peter. Simplified solution to the eddy-viscosity wake model. Tech. Report. 01327-000202. Renewable Energy Systems Ltd; 2009.