Active learning for interactive visualization

Journal of Machine Learning Research

Volumn 31, Issue , 2013, Pages 342-350

  Iwata, Tomoharu ^a   Houlsby, Neil ^a   Ghahramani, Zoubin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; INFORMATION THEORY;

AUTOMATIC VISUALIZATION; AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED; CONCRETE APPLICATIONS; INFORMATION THEORETIC CRITERION; INTERACTIVE VISUALIZATIONS; LAPLACIAN EIGENMAP; USER INTERACTION; VISUALIZATION METHOD;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84954240397     PISSN: 15324435     EISSN: 15337928     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. M. Belkin and P. Niyogi. Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation. Neural computation, 15(6): 1373-1396, 2003.
2. C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin. Libsvm: A library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol., 2(3): 27: 1-27: 27, 2011.
3. D. Cohn, Z. Ghahramani, and M. Jordan. Active learning with statistical models. Journal of Arti- ficial Intelligence Research, 4: 129-145, 1996.
4. T. Cover, J. Thomas, J. Proakis, M. Salehi, and R. Morelos-Zaragoza. Elements of Information The- ory. edition: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1991.
5. S. Dasgupta. Analysis of a greedy active learning strat egy. Advances in neural information processing sys- tems, 17: 337-344, 2005.
6. A. Endert, C. Han, D. Maiti, L. House, S. Leman, and C. North. Observation-level interaction with statistical models for visual analytics. In Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), 2011 IEEE Con- ference on, pages 121-130. IEEE, 2011.
7. D. Golovin and A. Krause. Adaptive submodularity: A new approach to active learning and stochastic optimization. In Proceedings of International Con- ference on Learning Theory (COLT), 2010.
8. C. Guestrin, A. Krause, and A. Singh. Near-optimal sensor placements in gaussian processes. In Proceed- ings of the 22nd international conference on Ma- chine learning, pages 265-272, 2005.
9. G. Hinton and S. Roweis. Stochastic neighbor embedding. Advances in neural information processing systems, 15: 833-840, 2002.
10. N. Houlsby, F. Huszár, Z. Ghahramani, and M. Lengyel. Bayesian active learning for classification and preference learning. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1112.5745, 2011.
11. S. Johansson and J. Johansson. Interactive dimensionality reduction through user-defined combinations of quality metrics. Visualization and Computer Graph- ics, IEEE Transactions on, 15(6): 993-1000, 2009.
12. D. Keim et al. Information visualization and visual data mining. IEEE transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 8(1): 1-8, 2002.
13. N. Lawrence. Gaussian process latent variable models for visualisation of high dimensional data. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 16: 329-336, 2004.
14. D. Lewis and W. Gale. A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers. In Proceedings of the 17th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Re- search and development in information retrieval, pages 3-12. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 1994.
15. D. Lindley. On a measure of the information provided by an experiment. The Annals of Mathemat- ical Statistics, pages 986-1005, 1956.
16. D. MacKay. Information-based objective functions for active data selection. Neural computation, 4(4): 590-604, 1992.
17. A. McCallum and K. Nigam. Employing em in poolbased active learning for text classification. In Pro- ceedings of ICML-98, 15th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 350-358, 1998.
18. F. V. Paulovich, D. Eler, J. Poco, C. P. Botha, R. Minghim, and L. Nonato. Piece wise laplacianbased projection for interactive data exploration and organization. Computer Graphics Forum, 30: 1091-1100, 2011.
19. N. Ramakrishnan, C. Bailey-Kellogg, S. Tadepalli, and V. Pandey. Gaussian processes for active data mining of spatial aggregates. In Proceedings of the Fifth SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, volume 119, page 427. Society for Industrial Mathematics, 2005.
20. S. Roweis and L. Saul. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science, 290 (5500): 2323-2326, 2000.
21. N. Roy and A. McCallum. Toward optimal active learning through monte carlo estimation of error reduction. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 441-448, 2001.
22. P. Sebastiani and H. Wynn. Maximum entropy sampling and optimal Bayesian experimental design. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 62(1): 145-157, 2000.
23. B. Settles. Active learning literature survey. Technical report, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 2009.
24. J. Tenenbaum, V. De Silva, and J. Langford. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science, 290(5500): 2319-2323, 2000.
25. S. Tong and D. Koller. Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2: 45-66, 2002.
26. W. Torgerson. Theory and methods of scaling. Wiley, 1958.
27. J. Venna, J. Peltonen, K. Nybo, H. Aidos, and S. Kaski. Information retrieval perspective to nonlinear dimensionality reduction for data visualization. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11: 451-490, 2010.
28. J. Verbeek and N. Vlassis. Gaussian fields for semisupervised regression and correspondence learning. Pattern Recognition, 39(10): 1864-1875, 2006.
29. G. Wills. Nicheworksinteractive visualization of very large graphs. Journal of Computational and Graph- ical Statistics, 8(2): 190-212, 1999.
30. X. Zhu, J. Lafferty, and Z. Ghahramani. Combining active learning and semi-supervised learning using gaussian fields and harmonic functions. In ICML 2003 workshop on The Continuum from Labeled to Unlabeled Data in Machine Learning and Data Min- ing, pages 58-65, 2003a.
31. X. Zhu, J. Lafferty, and Z. Ghahramani. Semisupervised learning: From Gaussian fields to Gaussian processes. Technical report, Carnegie Mellon University, 2003b.