Attitudes towards new assisted reproductive technologies in Sweden: A survey in women 30-39 years of age

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 95, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 38-44

  Wennberg, Anna Lena ^a,b   Rodriguez Wallberg, Kenny A ^c,d   Milsom, Ian ^a   Brännström, Mats ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b Nordic IVF Center   (Sweden)

^c KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^d KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^e Karolinska Institute and Stockholm IVF   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cancer; fertility preservation; infertility; oocyte; social egg freezing; uterus transplantation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AWARENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; FEMALE; FEMALE FERTILITY; GAMETE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; MALE; OOCYTE; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE; SWEDEN; TRANSPLANTATION; URBAN POPULATION; UTERUS; MOTHER; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADULT; CRYOPRESERVATION; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; OOCYTES; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; SURROGATE MOTHERS; URBAN POPULATION; UTERUS;

EID: 84954197172     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12781     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet. 1978;2:366.
2. Brannstrom M, Johannesson L, Bokstrom H, Kvarnstrom N, Molne J, Dahm-Kahler P, et al. Livebirth after uterus transplantation. Lancet. 2015;385:607-16.
3. Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, Leibo SP. Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:300-8.
4. Cobo A, Meseguer M, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Use of cryo-banked oocytes in an ovum donation programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2239-46.
5. Rienzi L, Romano S, Albricci L, Maggiulli R, Capalbo A, Baroni E, et al. Embryo development of fresh 'versus' vitrified metaphase II oocytes after ICSI: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:66-73.
6. Wennberg AL, Lundborg E, Zachrisson U, Nielsen S, Saldeen P, Brannstrom M. Egen äggbank för att skydda fertiliteten mot åldrande [Private egg bank to protect fertility against aging]. Läkartidningen. 2014;111:793-5.
7. Statens medicinsk-etiska råd (SMER). Assisterad befruktning - etiska aspekter [Assisted reproduction - ethical aspects]. In Swedish Stockholm: SMER. 2013;1:138-53.
8. The National Board of Health and Welfare. 2011. Open comparisons of socioeconomic status areas. Available online at: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/oppnajamforelser/ekonomisktbistand.
9. Stoop D, Nekkebroeck J, Devroey P. A survey on the intentions and attitudes towards oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons among women of reproductive age. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:655-61.
10. Tan SQ, Tan AW, Lau MS, Tan HH, Nadarajah S. Social oocyte freezing: a survey among Singaporean female medical students. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40:1345-52.
11. Mertes H. The portrayal of healthy women requesting oocyte cryo-preservation. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2013;5:141-6.
12. Statens medicinsk-etiska råd (SMER). Assisterad befruktning - etiska aspekter [Assisted reproduction - ethical aspects]. In SwedishStockholm: SMER. 2013;1:201-11.
13. Statens medicinsk-etiska rad (SMER). Assisterad befruktning - etiska aspekter [Assisted reproduction - ethical aspects]. In SwedishStockholm: SMER. 2013;1:176-81.
14. Jadva V, Blake L, Casey P, Golombok S. Surrogacy families 10 years on: relationship with the surrogate, decisions over disclosure and children's understanding of their surrogacy origins. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:3008-14.
15. Imrie S, Jadva V. The long-term experiences of surrogates: relationships and contact with surrogacy families in genetic and gestational surrogacy arrangements. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29:424-35.
16. Tieu MM. Altruistic surrogacy: the necessary objectification of surrogate mothers. J Med Ethics. 2009;35:171-5.
17. Armuand GM, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Wettergren L, Ahlgren J, Enblad G, Hoglund M, et al. Sex differences in fertility-related information received by young adult cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2147-53.
18. Edvinsson A, Forssman L, Milsom I, Nordfors G. Factors in the infertile couple influencing the success of artificial insemination with donor semen. Fertil Steril. 1990;53:81-7.
19. Schwartz D, Mayaux MJ. Female fecundity as a function of age: results of artificial insemination in 2193 nulliparous women with azoospermic husbands. Federation CECOS. N Engl J Med. 1982;306:404-6.
20. Lampic C, Svanberg AS, Karlstrom P, Tyden T. Fertility awareness, intentions concerning childbearing, and attitudes towards parenthood among female and male academics. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:558-64.
21. Peterson BD, Pirritano M, Tucker L, Lampic C. Fertility awareness and parenting attitudes among American male and female undergraduate university students. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1375-82.